14 DAY TRIAL // Back when word first got out that Kristen Stewart had cheated on Robert Pattinson with Rupert Sanders, a married man and father of two, fans thought it was just a shameless lie meant to discredit them. Then, photos of one of their romantic encounters came out in the press.
Though the theory that something is fishy about the whole “affair” has been circulating even before the photos came out, below is a video that might just convince you that, in Hollywood, nothing is as it seems.
One fan set out to prove that the photos Us Weekly ran, i.e. the photographic evidence that Stewart and Sanders had an affair, were doctored with the only purpose of creating a stir.
And boy, did they do that!
With Kristen still refusing to talk about the scandal that’s nearly cost her her career and saw her estranged from boyfriend Robert Pattinson, and Sanders still to get back into the good graces of wife Liberty Ross, the video below attempts to prove that the entire scandal might have been just a PR stunt.
Jenni Maier of Crushable seems inclined to believe what it’s proposing: the sizes of the two don’t match the locations the photos were taken at, which can only mean that the photos published in the weekly were doctored.
In fact, it could very well be that Kristen wasn’t even with Sanders at the time they were taken, as the video implies, which, in turn, could mean that she’s been set up by Sanders and his wife.
“According to this video, Rupert Sanders helped stage these photos with the help of an anonymous woman. Clever editing shows that the notorious photos featured in Us Weekly don’t match up to photos of the real location,” Maier writes.
“There are all kinds of scale issues with Rupert Sanders and Kristen Stewart’s height — and it’s easy to get caught up in what this video’s trying to imply. But what doesn’t make sense to me is why would they fake the photos?” she goes on to argue.
“That seems like an incredibly immense undertaking that would bring this conspiracy to a whole new level. Not only does it mean Rupert Sanders (and his anonymous henchmen) framed Kristen Stewart, but also that they had a reason to do so,” Maier adds.
All this would make sense if Kristen Stewart hadn’t issued a public apology to Robert Pattinson within 24 hours from the publication of these photos, owning up to her mistake / “indiscretion” and saying it was just a one-time thing.
That makes Maier believe that she too might have been involved in the PR stunt and, as such, that she’s not an innocent victim but one of the players.
Check out the video and let us know what you think: was Kristen Stewart set up, was she involved as well or is this clip reading too much into something that definitely happened?
