Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
TRENDING TODAY
Home > News > Technology and Gadgets > Systems

May 31st, 2012, 09:22 GMT · By

Google’s ChromeBox Challenged by AMD and Linux

SHARE:

Adjust text size:

Compulab's FitPC3
Enlarge picture
Embedded computing specialist, Israeli company Compulab, together with the Linux experts from Linux Mint, is preparing to launch the FitPC3 minicomputer to take on the newly-announced Google ChromeBox.

Unlike Google’s new SFF, the FitPC3 is built around AMD’s Brazos platform, with the embedded T40N and T56N APUs providing the computing power.

Software-wise, Compulab’s FitPC3 is coming with a Debian-derivative operating system. It is called Linux Mint, and it will be a highly-optimized version 13 called “Maya,” featuring MATE 1.2 desktop environment and the popular XBMC media center.

Compulab's FitPC3
Enlarge picture
The Compulab’s FitPC3 connectivity is well-endowed with six USB 2.0 ports, two USB 3.0 connectors and two eSATA ports.

There’s also a pair of HDMI and DisplayPort display outputs along with stereo audio, Gigabit Ethernet, Wirless N and Bluetooth 3.0 connectivity.

The two eSATA ports offer much more functionality than any of ChromeBox’ six USB 2.0 ports.

Inside the unit we find a 2.5” hard drive, AMD’s A55 FCH and up to 8 GB of DDR3-1066 memory.

HD audio in 7.1 implementation is also in there.

AMD’s T40N and T56N APUs both come with an integrated graphics processing unit (iGPU) with 80 shader cores.

The difference is that the T40N runs its iGPU at a low 280 Mhz frequency, calling it Radeon HD 6290, while the T56N APU runs its iGPU at a low 500 Mhz frequency, calling it Radeon HD 6310.

Compulab's FitPC3
Enlarge picture
T40N’s main frequency is a modest 1000 MHz that will allow the dual-core processor to stay below the maximum TDP of just 9 watts.

The T56N APU works at a much higher 1600 MHz, but it comes with a maximum TDP of 18 watts.

Both APUs feature a single DDR3 memory channel with a width of 64 bits, and that will be enough to face any Atom-powered nettop.

The FitPC3 will most likely be better priced than Samsung’s ChromeBox and the additional USB 3.0 and double eSATA connectivity will provide much better productivity.

On the performance side, we must make it clear that this is mainly an Atom competitor, as it can’t compete with Intel’s Sandy Bridge inside the latest ChromeBox.

On the iGPU side, maybe, but on the CPU side, a 1900 MHz dual-core Sandy Bridge Celeron will likely trounce the 1600 MHz Brazos.

If power consumption is the main issue, then AMD’s T40N and T56N APUs have the upper hand, as they consume a maximum of just 9W and 18W, respectively.

Compulab's FitPC3
Enlarge picture
Compulab's FitPC3
Enlarge picture


Also, it is important to mention that FitPC3 will be completely fanless.
FILED UNDER:
FitPC3
linux
brazos
apu
amd


3,195 hits · 2 comments
Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


NZXT Reveals Aperture M Advanced Media Reader

Fake HDD Crisis Confirmed: WD Spends Another $1.9 Billion USD

High-Performance microSDHC Cards Introduced by ADATA

Lian Li Announces the MiniQ PC-Q02 and PC-Q03 Cases

NEC Launches 10-Bit Professional P-IPS 24” Monitor

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: Linux Man on 31 May 2012, 15:24 UTC reply to this comment

Now if the 2.5" hard drive inside is SSD then this would be stellar.


Comment #2 by: madooo12 on 04 Jun 2012, 21:36 UTC reply to this comment

"The difference is that the T40N runs its iGPU at a low 280 Mhz frequency, calling it Radeon HD 6290, while the T56N APU runs its iGPU at a low 500 Mhz frequency, calling it Radeon HD 6310."

what, both are low?

Copyright © 2001-2013 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM