NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home / News / Microsoft / Windows

Windows


x64 Vista Driver Signing Does Not Equal Kernel Patch Protection

Says Microsoft

By Marius Oiaga, Technology News Editor

16th of August 2007, 13:27 GMT

Adjust text size:


Windows Vista
Enlarge picture
Driver signing in 64-bit Windows Vista editions does by no means equal Kernel Patch Protection, explained Russ Humphries, a Microsoft senior program manager with the security team focused on the operating system. Humphries stressed the differences between the two technologies in an effort to underscore the fact that the two security mitigations are
complementary but not conjoined. The mandatory driver signing and PatchGuard are features introduced in the 64-bit editions of Vista in order to bulletproof the platform's kernel against the loading of unsigned code and the installation of malware with rootkit behavior in the kernel.

"Driver signing provides a method to better identify the author/creator of a piece of software or code so that the author/creator can be approached in the event a reliability issue, vulnerability, or malware is discovered. Signing is not designed to confirm the "intent" of signed code (i.e. good or bad), or whether exploitable bugs or malicious code is present. Malicious or exploitable kernel drivers can lead to system compromise beyond disabling of code signing controls, since kernel driver code has access to hardware as well as all programs running as the user," Humphries stated, adding that "Kernel Patch Protection (KPP) helps protect code and critical structures in the Windows kernel from modification by unknown code or data."

The differentiation between driver signing and kernel patch protection comes on the heels of Microsoft updating PatchGuard in conjunction with AMS releasing new ATI drivers to replace vulnerable code. The Redmond company emphasized that the kernel patch protection update was not meant to fix any security flaws. "While this updates adds additional checks to Kernel patch protection system, it does not involve a security vulnerability. Known methods that allow the kernel to be patched on systems where Kernel patch protection is enabled require a system to already be compromised by an attacker," commented Joseph Lumia, Account Technology Specialist, Microsoft Enterprise.

TAGS:

Windows Vista | 64-bit | Microsoft
Read by 1,215 user(s) | Add comment | Link to this article TWEET THIS


Article rating:
Good (3.6/5) 9 vote(s)    

Subscribe to news | Print article | Send to friend

© Copyright 2001-2009 Softpedia
Contact:

 

 

SEARCH THE NEWS ARCHIVE :




Today's News
| Yesterday's News | News Archive


MORE RELATED ARTICLES:


Why Won't Microsoft Kill 32-bit Windows after Vista?

Nvidia Offers 10 Pages List of Why You Shouldn't Use Their Video Cards with Vista

x64 Vista Not For You? Then Download a Free 120-Day Trial of Windows XP Professional x64

Kaspersky Anti-Virus 7.0 + 64-bit Windows Vista

Windows 2000 PC with 512 MB of RAM Running Windows Vista

What If You Skipped Vista Altogether and Went Directly to Windows Seven?

Faulty ATI and Nvidia Drivers Can Lead to a Complete Takeover of 64-bit Vista

Why Vista's Successor Windows Seven Is... Windows Seven

User opinions:

No user comments yet.
Be the first to express your opinion using the form below!

Share your opinion:

Your Name:
Your Email Address:
(will not be used for commercial purposes)
Solve this to prove you're not a bot: =
Your review/opinion:

 




Windows tabGames tabDrivers tabMac tabLinux tabScripts tabMobile tabHandheld tabGadgets tabNews tab

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   ENTER NEWS SITE   |   ENGLISH BOARD   |   ROMANIAN FORUM