Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Apple > Iworld > iPhone

July 30th, 2009, 10:58 GMT · By

iPhone Jailbreaking Is Dangerous, Apple Says

SHARE:

Adjust text size:


Legalizing iPhone jailbreaking is quite dangerous, Apple says
Enlarge picture
Jailbreaking the iPhone is a common practice these days, so common that the Electronic Freedom Foundation (EFF) even came to the U.S. Copyright Office with the proposal to legalize the practice. The process, as many of you might already know, is based on modifying the iPhone so that it would run applications that haven't been approved by Apple.

In response to the jailbreaking legalizing proposal, the Cupertino, California-based Apple stated that it would enable hackers to launch denial of service attacks on cellular networks. In addition, it seems that the company also showed a few other scenarios that might turn into reality in case the EFF's proposal was approved.

The first thing that should be known about jailbreaking is that it offers access to the iPhone's baseband processor (BBP) software, which provides network connectivity and service usage. According to Apple, BBP is quite sensitive, and its modification might drive the device into being unable to connect to the network, while also influencing its GPS capabilities.

In addition, the company also stated that hackers would be thus enabled to do whatever they would like on AT&T's network. “In short, taking control of the BBP software would be much the equivalent of getting inside the firewall of a corporate computer – to potentially catastrophic result,” was what Apple said in the filing.

iPhone's Exclusive Chip Identification (ECID) might also be modified through access to the BBP software, offering hackers the possibility to avoid call charges and even enable people to make anonymous phone calls. In addition, the company also shared that hackers would be able to send oversized packets on the network, exceeding the carrier's configuration and blocking its airwaves. “The technological protection measures were designed into the iPhone precisely to prevent these kinds of pernicious activities, and if granted, the jailbreaking exemption would open the door to them,” Apple concluded.

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

2,696 hits · 2 comments · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


Apple Is Already Making App Store Improvements

Apple-China Unicom Deal for iPhone Exclusivity

Component Suppliers for Apple's Tablet Unveiled

iPhone OS 3.1 Beta 3 Released

iPhone OS 3.1 Might Come with Augmented Reality

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: jeff on 30 Jul 2009, 13:05 UTC reply to this comment

seems to me that if i want apple to continue to make this wonderful gizmo better and better AND to pass the improvements to me gratis, the least i can do i support apple and not circumvent apple's opportunity to make some profit.
we all need to make a profit to stay alive.
seems to me that jailbreaking is simply stealing.
if you would not consider shoplifting, then why jailbreak?


Comment #2 by: Alba on 31 Jul 2009, 13:11 UTC reply to this comment

Since ages people are striving to get the maximum achievement, for me personally I always felt at lost when I know something can go further or being better rationally without risking any live. The question is, why not go that far when in fact we can? The idea is very rational, I have bought the item and wanted to pushed it to the highest capability and jailbreaking opens up that possibility, and the risk is on me. What Apple said in above news is a theoretical statement without any factual proof, sound to me as another irrational (if not another limitation) to confined any Apple owners into their own jail (read: commerce tactic). We have many news on such irrational limitation (the recent one is about Google talk apps for iPhone), and what about mms capability (already exists long before iPhone) that was said can not be done for 2G version while the jaibreaking one of 2G can (not to mention video recording and video editing, and voice command, and ... the list goes on)? What would you call that? They create the device but why it seemed that someone else's know better? Irrational.

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM