Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Science > Nature

September 4th, 2010, 11:09 GMT · By

Wolves Make Little Difference in Yellowstone

SHARE:

Adjust text size:


A gray wolf, of the type reintroduced in Yellowstone to fight the elks
Enlarge picture
Experts say that plans of eliminating the negative effects that the elk population is having on aspen trees by reintroducing wolves are failing in the Yellowstone National Park.

The gray wolves have again be allowed to repopulated the landscape, as experts expected this would ensure the elk population is kept under control. However, this doesn't appear to be happening.

Experts say that, despite being hunted down mercilessly, elks are not renouncing their destructive habits, and add that the animals continue to destroy the sensitive trees.

The aspen cannot regenerate in time, and are therefore in grave danger. The number of wolves is already high, and so ecosystem specialists are at a loss about what to do next.

“This study not only confirms that elk are responsible for the decline of aspen in Yellowstone beginning in the 1890s, but also that none of the aspen groves studied after wolf restoration appear to be regenerating, even in areas risky to elk,” explains expert Matthew Kauffman.

He is a research scientist at the US Geological Survey (USGS), and also a member of the team that conducted the recent investigation, OurAmazingPlanet reports.

“A landscape-level aspen recovery is likely only to occur if wolves, in combination with other predators and climate factors, further reduce the elk population,” Kauffman reveals further.

Previous studies had demonstrated that the wolves are effective in keeping elk numbers down, but the new data show the exact opposite of that.

Since the wolves were reintroduced in the habitat, elk populations have declined by 40 percent, but that level is apparently not enough to guarantee the survival and recovery of aspen trees.

Full details of the discovery are published in Kauffman and his team in the latest issue of the esteemed scientific journal Ecology,

“This work is consistent with much of what researchers have learned from studying wolves and elk in Yellowstone,” the expert says.

“Elk certainly respond behaviorally to the predation risk posed by wolves, but those small alterations to feeding and moving across the landscape don't seem to add up to long-term benefits for aspen growing in areas risky to elk,” he concludes.
FILED UNDER:
wolves
elks
aspen
trees
USGS

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

1,479 hits · 4 comments · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


14,000 Year-Old Dog in Switzerland

Middle East Is the Home of Small Dogs

Counting Large Carnivores May Become Easier

Orcas May Be Divided in Four or More Species

Aspen Tree Clones Are Not Immortal

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: bullgod on 05 Sep 2010, 14:07 UTC reply to this comment

This guy has apparently not set foot in or around Yellowstone, aspens and willows are growing like crazy there.


Comment #2 by: FreeCoyote on 05 Sep 2010, 14:22 UTC reply to this comment

The idea that Elk are impacting Aspen negatively and have done so since 1890 is preposterous . Beaver literally mow down groves of aspen and have done so since 1890. Beaver have killed more Aspen than Yellowstone owns and not one "Scientist " has said one word about how Beaver effect Aspens negatively.
The Wolf /Aspen connection is a myth dreamed up by desperate Wolf Advocates to justify the destruction of the Greatest Elk Herd in the World .
The science isn't there , the Yellowstone fires are not mentioned, Beaver are non - existant , and 37 wolves total taken in the purge of Yellowstone could not have done anything to effect the health of Aspens any where . Wake up you're being lied to about everything !!!!


Comment #3 by: LadyElk on 05 Sep 2010, 18:09 UTC reply to this comment

quakies have been surviving in beautiful splendor all over the NW. for eons they are a delicate, water loving tree, are bitter to the taste of herbivores, quakies are very slow growing, as it takes years for a 'stand' of quakies to become stately members of the countryside . To me and everyone else, this quaky issue is just another inept attempt to try and validate wolves, and am glad that at least some one has common sense enough, to report that even with the massive decline of elk, the quakies still are having a hard time, could it be this horrid drought we have? and not the elk? but still the wolves need to "gone", that's a given from those of us who live with they're destruction.


Comment #4 by: Disgusted on 16 Sep 2010, 18:04 UTC reply to this comment

The wolves have actually taken out about 70% of the elk, not 40% and some herds are more. I suspect they are expecting even more dismal numbers in the elk herd this year and are already gearing up to CYA. Tehy may not even count, they tried to avoid it this last spring, they finally had to when Montana counted and published the numbers for their part of the herd which is 2235. Montana sold 2500 licenses for the Montana part of the herd prior to the wolf introduction, now they can no longer sell a single one.

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM