Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Webmaster > Internet Life

January 16th, 2012, 14:01 GMT · By

With the White House Condemning It, SOPA Is Dead, for Now

SHARE:

Adjust text size:


SOPA has been put on life support, for now
Enlarge picture
It seems that the 'danger' has passed, after losing much of its momentum in the past few weeks, the White House has dealt a final blow to the much-maligned SOPA bill, by saying that it, which means President Barack Obama, will not support a bill that "reduces freedom of expression, increases cybersecurity risk or undermines the dynamic, innovative global Internet."

The long-awaited response comes after SOPA was already losing support and after it became clear that people won't shut up about it, fortunately.

But it was enough to kill SOPA, or at least put in on life support, indefinitely. The Stop Online Piracy Act and its sister-bill/predecessor the Protect IP Act, PIPA, were designed to curb online piracy, but their vague wording and broad effects were deemed extreme by most people in the tech industry and beyond.

The White House stresses that "online piracy is a real problem that harms the American economy, threatens jobs for significant numbers of middle class workers and hurts some of our nation's most creative and innovative companies and entrepreneurs."

That's something that most people agree on, though, unfortunately, it's taken on face value. Pro-file sharing leader Rick Falkvinge argues that saying things like this just to appease those trying to increase copyright protection does not really add to the discussion.

In any case, representatives of the White House argue that any legislation designed to protect rights owners must not interfere with the infrastructure of the web, i.e. no messing with the DNS system, and must be clearly targeted at sites that can't be affected by current US laws.

What's more, the White House believes there should be strong due process on a case-by-case basis and that involving third-parties, such as ad networks or payments processors, must be done very carefully.

However, the White House does want some sort of legislation to pass this year as long as it is supported by all sides. That seems rather unlikely.

"The Administration calls on all sides to work together to pass sound legislation this year that provides prosecutors and rights holders new legal tools to combat online piracy originating beyond U.S. borders while staying true to the principles outlined above in this response," the White House said.

"We expect and encourage all private parties, including both content creators and Internet platform providers working together, to adopt voluntary measures and best practices to reduce online piracy," it added.

All in all, while not taking sides too much, the White House made it clear that legislation like SOPA or PIPA would be vetoed. Unsurprisingly, almost immediately, SOPA was 'shelved,' most likely indefinitely.

"While I remain concerned about Senate action on the Protect IP Act, I am confident that flawed legislation will not be taken up by this House," House Oversight Chairman Darrell Issa said in a statement, claiming that there will be no vote on the bill any time soon.

"Majority Leader Cantor has assured me that we will continue to work to address outstanding concerns and work to build consensus prior to any anti-piracy legislation coming before the House for a vote," he added.

That said, there's no guarantee that a bill similar to SOPA won't resurface with another name and a few changes. But it is much less likely that it will pass given the amount of opposition SOPA has managed to attract.
FILED UNDER:
SOPA
White House
piracy

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

1,108 hits · 2 comments · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


Facebook, Google, Mozilla, Twitter Band Together Against US Government Censorship

Wikipedia Considering Total Blackout to Oppose SOPA

Google Search Starts Censoring The Pirate Bay, IsoHunt, Just as Ineffective as Ever

Google Gets Involved in IsoHunt BitTorrent Lawsuit

Google Removes 'Piracy' Suggestions, Under Media Industry's Orders

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: Eric on 16 Jan 2012, 20:23 UTC reply to this comment

I have mixed feelings on if a bill like this could ever pass. Laws are bought and sold by lobbies, but lucky for us, there are a lot of powerful lobbies with a vested interest in keeping the internet the same, probably just as many as those for the media companies that want to control everything.

So the forces of greed exist on both sides of this concept...


Comment #2 by: Harley on 20 Jan 2012, 19:01 UTC reply to this comment

Well, if this HAD gone ahead, the internet would crash and burn. Every website out there has ATLEAST one copyrighted thing on it.

"I remember in Social Studies class how Settlers didn't want a king or dictators to rule their land. They wanted people to have religious freedom because people were fleeing England because of their harsh laws, no freedom, and to escape death because people spoke out against England. They wanted freedom and they knew that the "New World" was just right. But it looks as if the U.S. is turning into the same type of place as England was then. Congress is taking our freedom away. Our artistic freedom. Everything is shared. This is saying that none of us can re-draw Sephiroth and put our own little twist to him. We can't draw Rikku or Yuna. We can't make bases. It's like they're putting a leash on us and controlling us so that we can't express ourselves. If we couldn't draw our favorite characters and show them, or do random art using a person, movie, story, or poem as inspiration, then what would show or express? Some people write poems expressing a book, movie, or another poem. Some of us don't mind that. But Congress sees that as a major problem. Sometimes we can rant and rant and never be heard, but today we will be. Everyone has personal rights. We the artist have personal rights. Passing this bill and making it into a law takes away part of our Right To Speak. Culture grows by people sharing and expressing, not protecting. The Internet should be as open as it should be. I stand against SOPA and PIPA because we should all be free to do what ever we want to."

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM