Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Microsoft > Windows

March 11th, 2010, 12:01 GMT · By

Windows XP’s Death Won’t Come from Windows 7

SHARE:

Adjust text size:


Windows XP
Enlarge picture
Evolve or die is a mantra that can be easily applied to the world of technology. Products that fail to keep up with the overall evolution of the market will soon be discarded and replaced, as they will begin to feel like a fish out of water. The tone for the vast majority of offerings is of course given by Moore's law and the way that the number of transistors in every integrated circuit has a natural tendency to double every two years, still. But in the world in which a five-year-old computer can be considered obsolete by today’s standards, a decade-old operating system continues to be the norm. However, this is about to change, simply because Windows XP has stopped evolving.

Service Pack 3 was the last glimmer of hope for the operating system released in 2001, and there will be no other service pack for the aging operating system, not for the 32-bit and not for the 64-bit flavors. Microsoft will not breathe additional life into Windows Vista’s predecessor, although it is committed to supporting the OS until 2014. It’s safe to say that, although little hesitant to paint Windows XP obsolete, Microsoft won’t pull the plug on the platform, especially not anytime soon, as, today, over 65% of the world’s users are still relying on the OS.

But ignoring Microsoft’s commitment to supporting XP customers, it is a company product that has the biggest chance of killing the operating system. The exploding market share, illustrative of its strong sales, recommends Windows 7 as the candidate for a job that represented yet another failure for Vista from the point of view of many. Microsoft’s latest and fastest selling operating system in history can only grow by converting users away from older Windows platforms, and XP customers are most easily becoming converts. But, in the end, it won’t be Windows 7 to kill off XP, just as it won’t be Microsoft either.

XP’s death sentence can only be executed by the hardware and software ecosystem, by the lack of support and interoperability. And, as the ecosystem evolves, more and more products will overlook XP in order to focus on newer releases of Windows. As XP no longer grows to embrace new technologies and is already incapable of keeping up the pace with new solutions, users will have no choice but to recycle the platform.

Sometimes, the ecosystem works against its natural tendency to evolve

In such cases, backwards compatibility contributes to keeping old technologies alive. Case in point: the 4K Byte-Sector HDD-Data Format Standard. Come 2011, hard drives will suffer the biggest format evolution in the past 30 years. Hardware manufacturers have already committed to making an advanced 4,096-byte sector format the standard in new products versus the old 512-byte sector format that dates back to floppy disks. (via BBC)

Martin Hassner, Hitachi Global Storage Technologies, and Ed Grochowski, storage consultant, explain in the 4K Byte-Sector HDD-Data Format Standard whitepaper why the new standard is necessary:

“Areal densities (data densities) in HDD’s are increasing on a yearly basis, and this involves a continuous loss of SNR. Data integrity, or sector failure rate, must be maintained to meet user requirements, and this cannot be accomplished by adding more ECC (error correction bytes) at the current 512 byte format. This bottleneck has been recognized by all major HDD producers. Furthermore, areal density increases involve an increased sensitivity to defects which cannot be corrected at the current sector format.

“Current HDD products use approximately 9% of ECC overhead to correct a raw bit error rate from 10-5 to 10-11. Future HDD product specifications assume a linear density at which the raw bit error rate is 10-3. Such a raw bit error rate cannot be corrected at the current 512 byte sector format, independently of the number of ECC bytes. Anticipated defect sizes of approximately 100 bytes cannot be corrected at this sector format.

“Using the same amount of ECC overhead, 9%, at 4K sector format, a raw bit error rate of 10-2.4 can be corrected to the required 10-11 target, solving the bottleneck problem. In addition, a 4k sector format ECC allows the correction of defect sizes of up to 400 bytes.

“Disk defects and processing damage comprise a majority of HDD field failures, and as areal density increases the smaller bit sizes effectively increase defects density. Lower flying height within the drive also increases defect sensitivity.

“It is important to note that HDD industry trends include an increase in areal density as user requirements require. This results in the obvious capacity increase per drive as well as faster performance and reduced price per Gigabyte, all important to HDD users. It is expected that this trend will continue throughout this decade.”

The new 4K Byte-Sector HDDs deliver enhanced performance and efficiency, lower power consumption and boosted reliability, and more storage space (2 TB). Microsoft has already embraced the new format with the Windows 7 and Vista operating systems, however, it did not do the same with Windows XP. In this regard, it will be the manufacturers that will tailor the new hard drives to XP, by mimicking the usage of 512-byte sectors.

This means that users still relying on Windows XP could come across a variety of problems with new hard disks, from performance depreciation to downright incompatibility. But, then again, maybe it’s high time that an operating system released in 2001 no longer just worked with the latest technology.

Microsoft Windows 7 90-Day Eval VHD is available for download here.
Another Windows 7 RTM Enterprise 90-Day Evaluation is available for download here.

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

4,509 hits · 13 comments · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


$250 Off, Visual Studio 2010 Pre-Orders Now Live

Office 2010, 32-bit vs. 64-bit

Gates Asked for IP Royalties for OpenOffice from Sun Microsystems

Windows Azure platform AppFabric Billing Preview Now Live

Ignore Windows 7, Stick with XP and It Will Cost You

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: Jason on 11 Mar 2010, 13:18 UTC reply to this comment

This is totaly wrong!

It should be up to the consumer to decide what he wants to use or not. The consumer should not be forced to give up his or hers system just because the industry demands it.

I will stick to my Windows XP until they make a decent operating system to match my old hardware and software.

There should always be backward compatibility!!!

Comment #1.1 by: Windows20 on 12 Mar 2010, 07:00 GMT

hahahaha, If you guys have either Windows 95, 98, or 2000. Why did you guys give up them and use Windows XP? Now, you want to continue to use the outdated OS and refuse to use future versions of Windows? Windows 7 is backwards compatbile! My Windows XP software works on it. Also Windows 7 Professional and Ultimate can use XP Mode.

Upgrading Windows gives you more benfits. Windows XP is been attacking by many malware. I'm tired of using Windows XP, I know is an excellent OS. Windows 7 is excellent too! For Windows 8 will surprise you.

Using Linux and Mac will cause you to learn new curve. Apple Mac is not backwards compatbility. So you will be disapponted with Mac. Many Windows software is not compatbile with Linux. For Google Chrome OS, it doesn't let you install your favorite software. You will be forced to use Google's software.

Microsoft Windows is the only backwards compatbile OS. That is why it has over 90% market share.

New technology can't handle a nearly 10 year OS. Windows XP is obsolete. Without upgrading Windows, you will be in the dark era. You will have to handle malware by yourself. Also if you still don't change your mind. I would you to suggest to buy 50-100 hard drives right now! Then you can use as long as you want and as long that you don't buy new hardware or software.

Linux and Mac won't solve your problem. Your current Windows software won't even work. You must use Mac sofware. But samething. There will be always future versions of Mac and Linux. You can't prevent that.

For example, you have a 1950 car and we have a 2010 car. Who's better? A 2010 car. Why it has new tech and more safety. You can't put the new tech in a 1950 car!

Both of you guys are using outdated tech. In order to adapt new tech you need new versions of Windows. It's fun to use. It's more pretty and more secure. Microsoft's goal from now on starting at Windows 7. Is to develop an easier to use and more safer Windows.

If you refuse it, then too bad. You can't have new tech. The world has to move on. Microsoft's makes new OS even for Mac and Linux.

The only way to reduce the security attacks is to move away from Windows XP and start using more secure versions of Windows! Also you might have forgotten to update your security software. You also have to update Windows XP! Don't ignore it. It's your computer and you must care for it. For those who don't do it, they are the ones help spread the attacks.

I'm going to tell Microsoft to have Windows 8 to have high security then ever before. Capable of blocking rogue software and block dangerous websites.

Come on and be part of the modern world! If I were to be the boss at a company and I hired you guys. If I tell you to use this software and that software doesn't work with Windows XP but you still have Windows XP. This software is required for this business. If you said no, I will refuse to use future versions of Windows. You know what! I will fire you. What's is so hard about it!!! Just get the new version of Windows and you are good to go.

By the way, I expect that you two guys will continue to use Windows XP all the way to 2050! hahaha, oh my god! It's ancient! Then in 2050, either a new Windows OS or a non-Windows OS from Microsoft will be there.

Using Linux and Mac will cause you to be more angry because it doesn't work with your favorite Windows software.

Good luck!

Comment #1.2 by: Windows20 on 12 Mar 2010, 07:20 GMT

Here is a note to remember. Windows 7 is backward compatibile!!!! It works with all of my hardware and software.

But of course, the hardware and software company is the one to make things works fine.

A decade old OS won't be able to handle the future aspects of technology. When a new technology is forced to worked with older OS. The technology won't work properly. The new tech is designed to work with new OS for a better support.

If you use Linux or Mac. The compatibility will be even far worse! Mac is not designed to work with your Windows devices and software and Linux can even barely support it.

Microsoft's goal is to have future of Windows to have backward compatibility. All you have to do is to test out your hardware and software on a beta version of Windows. If it doesn't work then send a feedback to Microsoft and they will address the issue so that your stuff would work with Windows.


Comment #2 by: Skynet on 11 Mar 2010, 16:16 UTC reply to this comment

Agree. And there's no need to upgrade windows. You can use XP as long as there are compatible hardwares. And the new versions of HDDs have to support XP as long as there are people who want to use it. And if there will be no support? So what? As I said earlier: there's linux and mac. But I hope hardware suppliers will support XP very long yet. :)

Comment #2.1 by: Windows20 on 12 Mar 2010, 07:10 GMT

You have a major misunderstanding! Using Linux and Mac means you will still be using the new hard drive standards. All Linux and Mac Snow Leopard operating system supports this new standard. Windows XP doesn't support it. Already Windows Vista and 7 supports this standard. Then of course Windows 8. I'm using Windows 7 and I don't have to worry if my current hard drive fails in Jan 2011. You are wasting your time. You have a job to do!

You will must be prepare for future security attacks and new technology. But you can always buy a second computer. If you refuse to buy future Windows versions. You will miss out a lot of exciting things!


Comment #3 by: vjott on 12 Mar 2010, 01:04 UTC reply to this comment

It is up to the consumer to decide...whether to use an ancient, decaying Operating System or to upgrade. Have fun in 2014!


Comment #4 by: Skynet on 12 Mar 2010, 15:46 UTC reply to this comment

Who told that a user always needs the newest hardware? An older HDD or memory can be just as good as the newest. It depends on what are you using your pc for.

Comment #4.1 by: Windows20 on 13 Mar 2010, 11:12 GMT

Like I said Using Linux and Mac means you will still be using the new hard drive standards. All Linux and Mac Snow Leopard operating system supports this new standard. While Windows Vista and Windows 7 already support it.

How would you think that a DDR2 memory would be better then a DDR3 memory? DDR3 memory is better then DDR2 memory. The new hard drive standards that will be released in Jan 2011 will be a lot better then the current hard drive that you are using. I do expect that it will use less power and last much more longer.

However, the new hard drive standard is not the only one that would hit the market. But the solid-state-drive are there too. Some expert said that this kind of drive will last about a 100 years. That will be enough to have fun for your soon to be a 80 year old Windows XP in 2081.
If you do want to continue to use Windows XP for the rest of your life. Fine! But even as close to 2050, your Windows XP computer will no longer be able to support such future software and hardware. It will still can't handle the future tech. However, you can have your own museum.

The only choice to buy new storage hardware is the solid-state-drive. Currently it cost so expensive unless you are rich. The price of the drive won't go lower. It might take the next 10 years to be much more cheaper. Hard drives are the most inexpensive and more storage. So I would like for you to get ready to buy more hard drives or you end up buying soild-state drives. Hard drives can last either 5 to 8 years.

Did you know that solid-state-drives really make your computer boot super fast? It's true. Also they don't release a lot of heat compared to hard drives and they are smaller.

One thing that you can't complain is about CPU. Newer CPU are much more faster then older ones. But, I don't want to reach to the point where robots control us. Nope, I don't like that. That's the only scared i'm having.

There is always that you can buy a second computer. You will soon really notice the difference between this and that.

The thing is that, it's time to move on! I still kept my Windows 98 system recovery disk. I kept it for my own museum.

Everytime if your computer has a virus, don't always perform a system recovery. Just grab a security software and you are good to go. System recovery wastes your time.


Comment #5 by: dan on 14 Mar 2010, 20:46 UTC reply to this comment

well windows 7 pro and ultimate doeshave a windows xp mode for all of you who love it for some reason. just get over it things get better and software will outgrow xp.

Comment #5.1 by: justin on 15 Mar 2010, 17:02 GMT

actually you are incorrect if they are running XP chances are the system will be older then 3 years. you need a motherboard that supports hardware virtualization, therfore without it XP mode is useless, and the reason XP mode is even on Windows 7 is to patch the ease from transitioning from XP to 7. It is not meant to keep XP software alive another 10 years, programmers need to get off their asses and rewrite the code

Comment #5.2 by: Windows20 on 16 Mar 2010, 05:24 GMT

You are correct! Windows 7 Pro and Ultimate have Windows XP Mode. Those would be for users who want to continue to use their software. But, once again, it's time to move on! If you don't upgrade to Windows 7 then wait for Windows 8. Like I said Windows XP will soon can't support new tech. Why would companies would continue to sell hardware and software that works with a nearly a 80 OS in 2070? The new tech in 2050 would be 1000 times better then the tech in 2001. Why would some people refuse to use Windows 7? Windows 7 is already a popular OS in the world. Better then a Mac too.


Comment #6 by: Lyeal on 16 Mar 2010, 01:27 UTC reply to this comment

As a matter of fact I still use computers that run Windows 3.1, Windows 95, Windows 98, and Windows 2000 and DOS 5. That hardware all works just fine, along with the associated OS and applications. The Windows 98 system is much faster than the Windows XP system, with a CPU running at 1/3 the speed of the XP machine. The computer that runs Windows XP will not run Windows Vista because the manufacturer would not supply drivers. It is unlikely that Windows 7 will run on the XP machine, either. So I have to buy a new computer to run Windows 7. I will wait awhile before doing that. After all if I can do anything I want with one of the above machines, why upgrade anything. The internet is a jungle, with the anti-virus/firewall software always behind the bad guys with the help of Active-X and JavaScript.

Comment #6.1 by: Windows20 on 17 Mar 2010, 06:38 GMT

When you upgrade something from one version of Windows to the next gives your more possibilities. For example, Windows 95 or 98 has the new plug and play while Windows 3.1 doesn't. So it's easier to install hardware.

I'm planning to tell Microsoft ot see if it's possible to install hardware without installing software in the future Windows called Windows 8. What I meant is that you just plug in the device in there and it automatically installs it for you and then finish. That will save a lot of time. Microsoft will work hard on Windows 8 to make it more fun, faster, and more new possibilities.

I think that the only way to throw the bad guys out is to introduce a new version of Actiive-X and JavaScript and including Flash. Someone must introduce a safer add-on.

But for Internet Explorer 9, I will plan to tell Microsoft to introduce a number of security features desgined to kick the bad guys butt. One is ad blocker and a feature that will prevent spyware/adware from changing my home page! My security software is powerless to prevent such a thing. Oh yes, a feature to block dangerous javascript and ActiveX. One last feature a feature to block fake software from downloading into the computer.

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM