Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Microsoft > Windows

July 11th, 2008, 13:16 GMT · By

Windows Vista Is Superior to Leopard, XP, Linux, and All of Open Source

SHARE:

Adjust text size:


Windows Vista
Enlarge picture
There's Windows Vista, and there's the rest. Microsoft's perspective was eloquently made public at the company's Worldwide Partner Conference 2008 in Houston, Texas, on July 10, 2008. The Redmond company claims nothing less than that Windows Vista is superior to Apple's Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard, to all distributions of Linux, and to the entire environment of open source solutions, in terms of
security. Microsoft has never been shy at hinting of the superiority of its latest Windows client compared to rival operating systems. The OS vulnerability measuring games performed by Jeff Jones, a Security Strategy Director in Microsoft's Trustworthy Computing group is by now an integral part of the company's culture, and marketing arsenal. But this time, none other than Kevin Turner, Microsoft Chief Operating Officer has come out and said it loud and clear.

"Vista is the most secure product in the history of operating systems on a desktop. It is more secure today than Apple Leopard, or XP, or Linux, or open source," Turner stated (emphasis added). In addition to Jones' many Vista vs. XP vs. Linux vs. OS X vulnerability comparisons, Microsoft has the data collected from the Malicious Software Removal Tool and centralized in the April 2008 version of the Security Intelligence Report.

In his latest comparison, Jones indicated that Vista was impacted by less vulnerabilities than Windows XP SP2, Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop (v. 5 client), Red Hat Enterprise Linux WS (V. 4), Ubuntu 6.06 LTS Desktop, Apple Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard) and Apple Mac OS X 10.4 (Tiger). At the same time, in the January - June 2007 Security Intelligence Report, Microsoft revealed that the MSRT had cleaned 60.5% fewer Vista-based machines compared to XP SP2 computers, 44% fewer than Windows 2000 SP4 and 77% fewer than Windows Server 2003.

"We built this product to engineer in security on the front end, not as a service pack. As a result of that, we tightened down things like user account controls. Yes, it required a lot of compatibility upgrades and fixes, but you know what, it's important that you understand the progress, and you're able to articulate that, and fewer patching is what all customers want, and there's a cost savings there. Windows Vista with Service Pack 1 delivers that," Turner added.

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

5,403 hits · 2 comments · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


The Road to Windows 7 Is Paved with Good Vistas

Windows XP SP3 Is Live via Automatic Updates

Forget XP SP3, Vista SP1 and Windows 7, Microsoft Kills Windows 3.11

Saying "Yes" to Vista SP1

Beyond XP SP3 and Vista SP1, Windows 7 Getting Better and Better

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: John on 12 Jul 2008, 10:53 UTC reply to this comment

That quote looks a bit odd to me. Comparing Vista 'on the desktop' with server OS's, and older versions at that!


Comment #2 by: Janie on 29 Jun 2009, 23:12 UTC reply to this comment

ROFL -- it's so funny to read this after the fact now that we *know* they were lying, as usual.

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM