NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home / News / Microsoft / Security

Security


Windows Live OneCare Speeds Past Kaspersky, but Is Slower than Symantec and McAfee

And quite sluggish overall

By Marius Oiaga, Technology News Editor

28th of December 2007, 15:37 GMT

Adjust text size:


OneCare
Enlarge picture
There are various factors that come into play when security solutions are concerned. Antivirus products come with a variety of facets, from the frequency of virus signatures update to a low rate of false positives, and from performance to keeping a low profile as a background process. Well, one of the aspects involved in determining performance is the speed at which a particular security product would perform an on-demand scan. By all means, you don't want to grow old in front of your machine, waiting for the antivirus to check your system. In this context,
AV-Comparatives reveals that Microsoft's Windows Live OneCare speeds past products from Kaspersky and F-Secure, but is slower than what Symantec, BitDefender and McAfee have to offer.

"Some scanners may be slower than others due to various reasons. It has to be taken in account how reliable the detection rate of an anti-virus is; if the anti-virus product uses code emulation, if it is able to detect difficult polymorphic viruses, if it does a deep heuristic scan analysis, how depth and thorough the unpacking and unarchiving is, etc.", revealed Andreas Clementy, the head of the AV-Comparatives lab.

AV speed test
Enlarge picture
As you are able to see from the image integrated toward the bottom of this article, Windows Live OneCare 1.6.2111.30 bested the likes of Kaspersky AV 7.0.0.125; AntiVirusKit (AVK) 17.0.6353 from G DATA Security, and F-Secure Anti-Virus 7.01.128. At the same time, OneCare underperformed in comparison to McAfee VirusScan 11.2.121, Norton Anti-Virus 14.0.3.3, NOD32 Anti-Virus 2.70.39, BitDefender Prof.+ 10.247 and FortiClient 3.0.459.

"The average scanning throughput rate (scan speed) is calculated by the size of the clean-set in MB's dicided by the time needed to finish the scan in seconds. The scanning throughput rate of this test can not be compared with future tests or with other tests, as it varies from the set of files used. The scanning spees tests were done under Windows XP SP2, on a PC with Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6800EE 2.66 GHz, ASUS P5W WS Pro, 4096 MB DDR2-1150 Ram, SATA II disk and without a network connection", Clementy added.

TAGS:

Windows Live OneCare | Kaspersky | Symantec | McAfee
Read by 4,853 user(s) | Add comment | Link to this article TWEET THIS


Article rating:
Fair (2.7/5) 4 vote(s)    

Subscribe to news | Print article | Send to friend

© Copyright 2001-2009 Softpedia
Contact:

 

 

SEARCH THE NEWS ARCHIVE :




Today's News
| Yesterday's News | News Archive


MORE RELATED ARTICLES:


New Beta Version of Windows Live OneCare 2.0 Available

Windows Live OneCare 2.0 Comes with a New Online Flow

Windows Live OneCare Joggles Around with Its Expiration Date

Windows Live OneCare No Longer the Laughingstock of the Security Industry

Microsoft Antivirus: Less than Sophos and Kaspersky, but More than Symantec and BitDefender

Windows Live Critical Updates Coming Up

User opinions:

No user comments yet.
Be the first to express your opinion using the form below!

Share your opinion:

Your Name:
Your Email Address:
(will not be used for commercial purposes)
Solve this to prove you're not a bot: =
Your review/opinion:

 




Windows tabGames tabDrivers tabMac tabLinux tabScripts tabMobile tabHandheld tabGadgets tabNews tab

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   ENTER NEWS SITE   |   ENGLISH BOARD   |   ROMANIAN FORUM