NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home / News / Microsoft / Security

Security


Windows Live OneCare Bests Kaspersky, Symantec, McAfee, Nod32, BitDefender

But not Avira

By Marius Oiaga, Technology News Editor

1st of June 2009, 13:47 GMT

Adjust text size:


Windows Live OneCare
Enlarge picture
If you're going to go out, at least go out with a bang. This seems to be Microsoft's motto for Windows Live OneCare, a security solution that, in the latest comparative tests performed by AV-Comparatives, managed to best almost all rival products, including offerings from Eset, BitDefender, Kaspersky, AVG, Avast, Sophos, Symantec, McAfee, Norman, Kingsoft, G Data and F-Secure. OneCare, which has but a few more months to live, had a proactive detection rate of new malware of 60%. Only Avira AntiVir Premium 8.2.0.374 managed to score higher, with a detection rate of 69%.

The tests performed by AV-Comparatives were focused on the generic and heuristic techniques security products use in order to detect and stop malicious code for which no virus signatures exist. AV-Comparatives only updated the security solutions tested until February 9, 2009, and used malware samples from February 9 until February 16.

“AV-Comparatives published the May edition of its proactive/retrospective testing to measure 16 anti-virus vendors’ capability in detecting new threats. Microsoft anti-virus received one of only 3 Advanced+ ratings. Our detection rate was 60%, the second best among the participants, and we had the fewest false positive samples,” revealed a member of the Forefront team.

Eset's Nod32 delivered a proactive malware detection rate of 56%, BitDefender 12.0.11.4 managed just 50%, AVG Anti-Virus 8.0.234 - 45%, Avast professional Edition 4.8 – 42%. For Sophos Anti-Virus 7.6.4 the detection rate was 37%, 35% for Symantec Norton 16.2.0.7, 25% for McAfee VirusScan Plus 13.3.117 and 14% for F-Secure Anti-Virus 9.00.149.

Still, what recommends Windows Live OneCare's proactive protection over that of its rivals is the extremely low number of false positives. OneCare did not have more than a couple of false positives, which means that the security solution is highly unlikely to detect genuine files as malware.

Come June 30, 2009, Microsoft will stop selling Windows Live OneCare licenses, and instead start offering a free security solution currently codenamed Morro. The Redmond company explained that it would continue to support existing OneCare customers until their subscriptions expire.

UPDATE: "It’s true that Microsoft will discontinue retail sales of OneCare on 30 June, 2009 so you won’t find it in stores after that date, but consumers will still be able to purchase the product after 30 June directly from Microsoft at Live OneCare. No specific date has been given yet for when all sales of the product will cease, but I can follow up with that information once I have it if you are interested," a Microsoft spokesperson told Softpedia.

TAGS:

Windows Live OneCare | Kaspersky | Symantec | Avira | Sophos
Read by 5,522 user(s) | Add comment | Link to this article TWEET THIS


Article rating:
Excellent (4.8/5) 9 vote(s)    

Subscribe to news | Print article | Send to friend

© Copyright 2001-2009 Softpedia
Contact:

 

 

SEARCH THE NEWS ARCHIVE :




Today's News
| Yesterday's News | News Archive


MORE RELATED ARTICLES:


MED-V File Types for Antivirus Exclusions

Download Forefront Security for Exchange Server SP1 Capacity Planning Tool

Installing Windows 7 Build 7137 - 35 Screenshot Gallery

The Security Development Lifecycle Is Not Just for Microsoft

BitDefender Total Security 2010 Beta 2 Is Half Out

Comodo Software Removed from Softpedia [UPDATE 3]

Microsoft Zentity 1.0 RTM

ADMT 3.1 Doesn't Install on Windows Server 2008 R2

User opinions:


Comment #1 by: Daniel Schrader on 02 Jun 2009, 19:30 GMT reply to this comment

I'm with Symantec, but my biases aside, this is a test of one part of one feature of a security solution.

AV-Comparatives looks only at the ability to identify malware within a static file. This particular test looks at static file scanning with old signature files. This is useful, but it is akin to comparing car safety by looking only bumper tests - and ignoring airbags, seat belts, stopping distance . . . .

The best security suites include network intrusion protection to look at attempts to exploit vulnerabilities, browser protection to look for malicious code hidden in web sites, search security, firewall, real time process heuristics (how programs behave as they execute), phishing protection . . . . None of these technologies were touched by av-comparatives.

So hats off to av-comparatives for what they did - but don't draw conclusions from this very limited test.

Comment #1.1 by: David S on 23 Jun 2009, 23:20 GMT

Did you read the article?

It was a proactive test.

"The tests performed by AV-Comparatives were focused on the generic and heuristic techniques security products use in order to detect and stop malicious code for which no virus signatures exist. AV-Comparatives only updated the security solutions tested until February 9, 2009, and used malware samples from February 9 until February 16."


Comment #2 by: min on 15 Sep 2009, 06:55 GMT reply to this comment

I love it

Share your opinion:

Your Name:
Your Email Address:
(will not be used for commercial purposes)
Solve this to prove you're not a bot: =
Your review/opinion:

 




Windows tabGames tabDrivers tabMac tabLinux tabScripts tabMobile tabHandheld tabGadgets tabNews tab

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   ENTER NEWS SITE   |   ENGLISH BOARD   |   ROMANIAN FORUM