Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Microsoft > Windows

May 25th, 2011, 12:29 GMT · By

Windows 8 Swapped Back for Windows vNext in Ballmer’s China Speech

SHARE:

Adjust text size:


Windows 8
Enlarge picture
For a minute there, it appeared like Microsoft had finally settled the whole Windows 8 vs. Windows vNext problem, and opted to use the first as the official moniker for the forthcoming major iteration of the Windows client. Alas, it wasn’t meant to be.

Despite using it internally since early 2009, the Redmond company has so far failed to confirm Windows 8 as THE label of Windows 7’s successor.

Instead, on the few occasions when it did talk about Windows 8, the software giant went with the generic “the next version of Windows” reference.

While in Tokyo, Japan earlier this week, and talking at the Microsoft Developer Forum, Chief Executive Officer Steve Ballmer dropped the Windows 8 bomb, and not just once.

“As we progress through the year, you ought to expect to hear a lot about Windows 8. Windows 8 slates, tablets, PCs, a variety of different form factors,” he said.

I could not help but wonder if it was the end for Windows Next and Windows vNext, and whether the time had come for Microsoft not only to start talking more about Windows 8, but also to actually call it as such.

After leaving Japan, Microsoft’ CEO attended China Be What’s Next & Awards Ceremony, in Beijing on May 24th.

Ballmer also mentioned Windows 7’s successor, but he made sure not to utter “Windows 8” at all.

“Last January we announced that the next version of Windows will support the next generation of chip technologies, so-called systems on a chip. From Intel and AMD, of course, but also ARM processors from Invidia, from Qualcom, from Texas Instruments, and potentially others over time,” he stated.

So it looks like Ballmer mentioning Windows 8 was a slip of the tongue at best, and that it’s back to Windows vNext for Microsoft.

I do have to mention that Microsoft is reportedly searching for a new brand to slap on top of the next iteration of Windows, one other than Windows 8, obviously.

This is all speculation at this point in time, and should be treated with a healthy dose of skepticism, as nothing has been confirmed by the Redmond company.

The first public Beta development milestone is expected sometime by the end of 2011, and my best guess is that the official moniker for the next version of Windows will be unveiled by then.

I’m also curious to hear your thoughts on the matter. Should Microsoft stick with Windows 8 as the final brand of the operating system, or should it come up with a new moniker, per the Vista or XP model?

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

1,566 hits · 5 comments · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


Ballmer Drops the Windows 8 Bomb, Mentions Win8 Slates / Tablets, Next Gen Windows Systems

Just Like Windows 8, Office 15 Also Sports Hidden Goodies

Feast Your Eyes on Office 15 Moorea Demos

Windows 7 Is Ready for World IPv6 Day

Windows 8 Should Embrace New Computing Paradigms

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: A WIN XP USER on 25 May 2011, 13:34 UTC reply to this comment

As the windows OS develop they become bloated. MS products slowly and slowly becoming bloatware. If Windows 8 wants to be popular it then it should run on 1.8 GHz processor with 512 MB RAM and 64 MB VGA RAM. It should be like WINDOWS XP.

Comment #1.1 by: Afrikan MintGuy on 26 May 2011, 07:43 GMT

I totally agree, as much as processing power, RAM and HD space are all increasing at an exponential rate, there's no reason why I have to upgrade my hardware every 2 - 3 years just to run the newest version of Windows at a decent speed. There should be some backwards compatibility in terms of both software and hardware and system requirements don't have to be astronomically high. I think Linux has set a good example on that, most distros run at an average of 512 RAM, sum run at 256MB and sum even go as low as 64 MB with most of the functionality still in tact.

On the naming convention I like Windows 8. But they cud alwayz follow a similar convention to Mac OS X and Ubuntu, give the OS a version number and code name, e.g. Windows 8 vNext. Just a thought.


Comment #2 by: User on 26 May 2011, 14:14 UTC reply to this comment

Invidia? Shouldn't this be Nvidia?

Comment #2.1 by: Marius Oiaga on 26 May 2011, 14:25 GMT

It is actually, but that’s the actual quote from Ballmer, original spelling.


Comment #3 by: Siva7891 on 04 Jul 2011, 06:02 UTC reply to this comment

I don't think Win OS are bloated, they are keeping up with present improvements in technology. Prices of computer hardware is reduced when compared to few year back. In my country (India) I can have a PC which can run Win7 Home Premium at Rs.18000($400) or lesser.
I looking forward for the Win vNext...

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM