Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Microsoft > Security

October 13th, 2010, 14:50 GMT · By

Windows 7 vs. XP SP3 vs. Vista SP2– Botnet Infections

SHARE:

Adjust text size:


Windows logos
Enlarge picture
Microsoft has been constantly boosting the security capabilities of its Windows clients, and the company has the numbers to prove it.

In the Microsoft Security Intelligence Report Volume 9 (for the first half of 2010) released at RSA Europe, the Redmond company points out that users running Windows 7 are less susceptible to infections with malware designed to transform their PCs into zombie machines than customers that continue to use Windows Vista or Windows XP.

There are less Windows 7 computers compromised and made part of botnets than Vista and XP, even if the two platforms have the latest service pack installed, as users can see in the graphic included in this article, courtesy of Microsoft.

“The botnet infection rate for Windows 7 and Windows Vista is significantly lower than that of their desktop predecessor Windows XP with any service pack installed, which reflects the security improvements that have been made to the more recent versions of Windows,” the company explained.

“Considering only computers that have had the most recent service pack for their operating systems installed, the infection rate for Windows XP SP3 is twice as high as that of Windows Vista SP2 and more than four times as high as that of the release-to manufacturing (RTM) version of Windows 7.”

Number of computers cleaned of bot-related malware for every 1,000 executions of the MSRT, 2Q10
Enlarge picture
The fact of the matter is that Windows XP SP3 and XP SP2 have the highest infection rate out of all Windows operating systems, even higher than XP SP1 and XP RTM.

Microsoft has dropped support for older versions of Windows XP, and this how the company explains the drop in infection rates, as MSRT is not installed and executed on non-supported platforms.

“As IT departments and computer users move to more recent service packs or Windows versions, computers running older operating system versions are often relegated to non-production roles or other specialized environments, which may explain the lower infection rates,” the company stated.

SIRv9 comes to prove, if there was any need, that customers are better off running the latest version of Windows, at least when it comes down to taking advantage of the security enhancements delivered by the Redmond company.

“The features and updates available with different versions of the Windows operating system, along with the differences in the way people and organizations use each version, affect the infection rates seen with different versions and service packs,” the software giant said.

Windows 7 RTM Enterprise 90-Day Evaluation is available for download here.

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

10,079 hits · 8 comments · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


Free Microsoft Security Tool “Armed” to Kill the Zbot/ZeuS Botnet

IE9 Beta Safe from 10 IE Vulnerabilities Patched this Month

Microsoft Cleaned 6.5 Million Zombie PCs Between April and June 2010

Patches Released for 49 Vulnerabilities in Windows, IE, Office and .NET

New Microsoft Security Essentials Release with Updated Antimalware Engine Next Week

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: jonathan on 17 Oct 2010, 14:24 UTC reply to this comment

couldn't this be called an infomercial since it's actually produced by Microsoft?


Comment #2 by: Mark in MI on 17 Oct 2010, 16:40 UTC reply to this comment

This doesn't mean anything because older computers will always have higher infection rate than newer ones. We need to see the W7 infection rate versus XP computers after the same time in service.


Comment #3 by: Ndci on 17 Oct 2010, 17:20 UTC reply to this comment

Wow, looks like Windows Server 2008 R2 RTM is the most secure!

P.S.Looks like I'm first to comment!


Comment #4 by: AlaskaTechpros on 17 Oct 2010, 19:00 UTC reply to this comment

The report doesn't seem to account for the numbers of total licences of each OS. So does this report tell us anything? For one thing, XP has been out for 9 years. And the numbers of Server 2003 licenses vs XP licenses has to be radically different.

Anchorage Alaska


Comment #5 by: Vargo on 18 Oct 2010, 00:52 UTC reply to this comment

What's the bet that Microsoft may have employed hackers to work on their older OS's (XP


Comment #6 by: Paranoid Peter on 15 Nov 2010, 21:11 UTC reply to this comment

This needs to be compared to the number of users (a percentage) or it just means there are more XP users than VISTA and more VISTA users than Win 7.

Security is a matter of being aware of the programs that are installed, and what they are doing.

Bring on a version Windows that can actually tell me what program is running that svhost.exe (network connection). VISTA is so much better than XP in that respect with the additional features in the Performance and Reliability centre. The networking section shows what IP addresses are connecting but it still doesn't make it easy to identify the IP addresses that are connected to your PC.


Comment #7 by: Ray on 25 Nov 2010, 16:00 UTC reply to this comment

Windows 7 is EXTREMELY unstable compared to XP. I doubt businesses will swap to it without a few service packs.

I entered XP before SP1 and was told to go with 98SE but I wanted a new OS with a new computer. Whatever service pack you went to in XP wait for the equivalent in W7. (I'm looking forward to W7 SP3 - but not holding my breath)

Things that go wrong with W7: lots of programmes with (not responding) including Office, which requires using the task manager regularly to fix. eg. Excel opens very slowly or loses information even after saving. That is pretty scary to get used to losing hours of work with no control over it. An odd one was having to run a CMD scan when you loose the PASTE function. There are problems with connecting to company servers.

There are a lot of nice things with W7 that stops me going back to XP, but if you are using XP wait for some service packs for W7 to come out to fix a very unstable OS.

The best way to define W7 is to say it is very nice looking crap


Comment #8 by: SHAHEER on 05 May 2011, 16:43 UTC reply to this comment

WINDOWS XP ALWAYS BETTER FROM 7 AND VISTA

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM