NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Microsoft > Windows

Windows


Windows 7 RTM vs. Windows 7 Service Pack 1 (SP1)

Breaking the mold

By Marius Oiaga, Technology News Editor

March 25th, 2009, 08:13 GMT

Adjust text size:


Windows 7
Enlarge picture
Microsoft’s upcoming Windows client and server operating systems have the potential to break the mold of the RTM vs. Service Pack 1 milestones in the context of customers giving themselves green light to embrace the platforms. Windows 7 will make reality what the Redmond company has gone head over heels promoting for its precursor, Windows Vista: waiting for Service Pack 1 will not be necessary, the RTM build will do just fine. Market analysis firm Gartner predicted that “Windows 7 will not need SP1” in a research authored by Gartner analyst, Michael A. Silver. Still, Silver emphasized that business customers would only start deploying Windows 7 at scale anywhere from 12 to 18 months after the operating system was released.

“The first Service Pack for Windows 7 is not necessary for the operating system's stability and security readiness. However, organizations likely won't be ready to deploy Windows 7 before SP1 ships, so they will include it in their initial deployments,” Silver said. “Windows 7 is basically an incremental release of Windows Vista. This has many organizations wondering whether they will be able to begin their Windows 7 deployments within a few months after it ships and without waiting for SP1. Lack of official ISV support likely will delay deployments until after SP1 arrives. That being the case, organizations should plan to integrate SP1 into their initial deployments to reduce the number of major changes that will need to be distributed to production systems.”

While for end users upgrading to Windows 7 is as simple as getting a new machine, or just an upgrade license, and preparing for a smooth experience if their current machines are running Vista, less smooth if the upgrade is done from Windows XP, the same is not the case for business users. Corporations often synchronize software and hardware upgrades throughout their IT infrastructure, and even so, there is complex application-compatibility and hardware-compatibility testing involved.

Microsoft has indicated that moving from Vista to Windows 7 is the best strategy compared to skipping Vista and migrating directly from XP to Windows 7. Businesses that will replace XP with Windows 7 will also need to take into consideration training for their employees. The graphical user interface has been overhauled consistently enough from XP to Win 7, and some workers will find it difficult, albeit only at first, to perform at normal parameters with the new OS.

Gartner is advising that business users should allow at least a period of half a year after all independent software vendors introduce support for Windows 7 to test products. Piloting Windows 7 is an integral part of every corporate mainstream deployment, but it is also a process that will push migration back 12 to 18 months since the introduction of the operating system. At this point in time, Service Pack 1 for Windows 7 would already have been available.

“Conventional wisdom has been that organizations need to wait for the first Service Pack to ship before they deploy a new client OS. This used to be a necessity. The availability of beta software to test the new product was not as broad as it is today, and people expected the initial release to be buggy and unstable. The first Service Pack usually would ship approximately nine to 12 months after the initial OS shipment, and would usually represent a marked improvement in stability. Today, SP1 does not represent the milestone it used to,” Silver stated.

Service Pack 1 for Windows has long been regarded as a landmark of maturity, and a signal that adoption could start without the vast majority of issues affecting the RTM release. Nowhere was this more true than with Windows Vista, although Microsoft did its best to convince customers of the contrary. However, Windows 7 is Windows 6.1 to Vista (Windows 6.0), or a Vista Release 2 (R2) if you will. Even in Beta, Windows 7 does not deal, by any measure, with the same hardware and software incompatibility issues, stability hiccups and performance problems. Service Pack 1 is expected to drop anywhere from nine to 12 months after Windows 7 RTM. This puts the potential deadline of Windows 7 SP1 sometime by the end of 2010, early 2011.

TAGS:

Windows 7 | RTM | SP1 | Service Pack 1 | Windows Vista
Read by 82,793 user(s) | Add comment | Link to this article TWEET THIS


Article rating:
Good (3.8/5) 25 vote(s)    

Subscribe to news | Print article | Send to friend

© Copyright 2001-2010 Softpedia
Contact:

 

 

SEARCH THE NEWS ARCHIVE :




Today's News
| Yesterday's News | News Archive


MORE RELATED ARTICLES:


IE8 Bests Firefox 3.07, Safari 3, Chrome 1.0.154, Opera 9.64 and IE7

Download Firefox 3.1 Cognitive Shield, New Tab Page

Download Windows Home Server via MSDN

Post-RTW IE8 Bugs Will Be Fixed in the Next Version of Internet Explorer

Windows Home Server Power Pack 2 (PP2) Available

Download New Windows 7 Direct3D 11 (DirectX 11) Release

Download Free Windows Vista Enterprise (VHD)

Download .NET RIA Services for Windows 7, Vista SP1 and XP SP3

User opinions:


Comment #1 by: Mike on 25 Mar 2009, 15:33 GMT reply to this comment

As a longtime fan of Microsoft Vista has been a big disapointment for me even today. Fat, buggie no stability. With the install of Windows 7Microsoft has re-entered the realm of a supplier of a viable operating system. Windows 7 install went smooth. The print drivers were a little hard to come by and compatable virus protection has slim pickings. But all this is expected for a non- released operating system. Windows 7 just has a lighter feel with the smoothness it displays. It is very stable and every bit as good as OS X. While it is not quite as fast as OS X it is heads and shoulders above Vista in all ways. If it were me I would pass on Vista and wait for Windows 7. You will have less problems moving to Windows 7 than moving to Vista. Just my thoughts from useing them all XP-Vista-Win 7- OS X - Linux. I would rate Win 7 & OS X even - Linux next - with XP then Vista rounding out the list.

Comment #1.1 by: @Mike on 28 Mar 2009, 14:18 GMT

For me Windows Vista is the BEST OS.I didn't have any problems..VISTA RULZ


Comment #2 by: tomashcu on 22 Sep 2009, 08:22 GMT reply to this comment

hello, i believe that windows 7 IS one of the best windows operating systems around, it is so much quicker than vista and it can run smoothly on machines with onhly 512 megs of ram! its great, i currently have windows 7 RTM ver. 7600


Comment #3 by: Tyrone Kennedy on 23 Nov 2009, 13:01 GMT reply to this comment

Market analysis firm Gartner predicted that “Windows 7 will not need SP1” in a research authored by Gartner analyst, Michael A. Silver

Ok so after the problems with printers both xerox, and Hp and all the other problems around windows 7 Would Michael like to eat his hat?

Windows 7 will not be adopted until service pack 1 at best and more than likely will not be stable till service pack 2.


Comment #4 by: Bob on 02 Jan 2010, 21:17 GMT reply to this comment

Wrong, Windows 7 is SP1 of VISTA. Get a clue.


Comment #5 by: XaBER on 10 Jan 2010, 06:22 GMT reply to this comment

So where can we download this Service Pack to Windows 7, from Vista BOB ?....You are so wrong !


Comment #6 by: Poumtatalia on 12 Jan 2010, 13:39 GMT reply to this comment

Windows 7 is a bad version of apple like OS. It works fine... as long as you don't actually use it! As soon as you do some normal maintenance (change user rights on a HD, resize partitions, ...) it starts bugging.
I'm not at all impressed.


Comment #7 by: kjack on 17 Jan 2010, 23:53 GMT reply to this comment

i personally think that this is the most stable and easy to use os microsoft has ever produced


Comment #8 by: Torstar on 21 Jan 2010, 17:44 GMT reply to this comment

Bob said :"Wrong, Windows 7 is SP1 of VISTA. Get a clue. "

Uhh speaking of clues.. get one.

Vista has had SP1 Released already. Win7 may look like vista, but brother it does NOT work like vista. Vista is crap. always was always will be. It was rushed ( for whatever reason) to get it to market. MS did the best thing any company could do, they let THE USERS actually participate in the beta, so MS got OUR opinions/comments/suggestions for the OS and didn't just rely on thier own internal beta testers. I seriously hope MS learned a lesson from that and will continue to let THE USERS test the beta out.

And they have. Right now you can Download the Beta for MS office 2010.
http://www.microsoft.com/office/2010/en/download-office-professional-plus/default.aspx

BUT you HAVE to be an IT person otherwise you can'tl download it.

but poor ol' bob will likely think that the 2010 office is just an office sp , so he won't dl it : P


Comment #9 by: Shawn on 01 Feb 2010, 18:37 GMT reply to this comment

Windows 7 doesnt have a sp1, As this sucks Right know my programs looking for these..Service packs, microsoft however says they will not be reliesed before 2011. WTH.. This meens i have to manually update my Anti virus till then??. thats BS..


Comment #10 by: Jack on 02 Feb 2010, 11:17 GMT reply to this comment

Windows 7 RC was buggy but ok, Windows 7 RTM was still buggy but far more stable than any other release of OS from Microsoft alone that ive seen.

as far as client reviews well it was easier than vista really they didnt have to go to vista but the training required was next to nothing because everything was already well laid out and fairly obvious

Share your opinion:

Your Name:
Your Email Address:
(will not be used for commercial purposes)
Solve this to prove you're not a bot: =
Your review/opinion:

 




Windows tabGames tabDrivers tabMac tabLinux tabScripts tabMobile tabHandheld tabGadgets tabNews tab

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   ENTER NEWS SITE   |   ENGLISH BOARD   |   ROMANIAN FORUM