NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home / News / Microsoft / Windows

Windows


Windows 7 Build 7048 Labeled Release Candidate 1 (RC1)

It is all speculation at this point in time

By Marius Oiaga, Technology News Editor

18th of February 2009, 08:38 GMT

Adjust text size:


Windows
Enlarge picture
The first Release Candidate of Windows 7 is beginning to take contour. Following the availability of Windows 7 Beta Build 7000 for the general public on January 10, 2009, and the discontinuation of all downloads on February 12, there has been nothing but complete radio silence from Microsoft on the development of the next iteration of Windows. Still, it is undeniable that the Redmond company is making consistent headway building Windows 7, and that the development process has already moved past the Beta stage to the Release Candidate branch. Leaked information from testers now reveals that Windows 7 Build 7048 carries the Release Candidate 1 (RC1) label.

Various sources, especially enthusiasts on Windows-centric forums, indicate that a select pool of Microsoft testers have received Windows 7 Build 6.1.7048.winmain_win7rc1.090211-1625. Microsoft has yet to confirm or deny that, as at just a little over one month since the public launch of Windows 7 Beta it has started compiling builds of the operating system belonging to the RC branch.

However, the version label associated with Windows 7 Build 7048 indeed suggests that the Redmond company has branched off winmain. At the same time, “090211-1625” indicates that Windows 7 Build 7048 was compiled on February 11, 2009, at 4:25 PM.

Nevertheless, the leaked details on Windows 7 Build 7048 RC have to be taken with a grain of salt, as Microsoft has yet to unveil the actual naming scheme that will be associated with RC branch builds. Before Windows 7 Build 7048, testers leaked information and screenshots on Windows 7 Build 7032 (6.1.7032.0.winmain.090129-1812).

But, for the time being, only the bits for Windows 7 Build 7022 are available for download in the wild, with the 32-bit flavor having been leaked to BitTorrent trackers. As far as Microsoft is concerned, mum's the word for the Windows 7 Release Candidate, which is reportedly planned for an April 2009 launch.


Update:  Softpedia has been receiving feedback pointing out that Windows 7 Build 7048 is actually a fake and that Microsoft has yet to start compiling RC Builds of Windows 7. We will keep you updated as more information becomes available.

TAGS:

Windows 7 | Build 7048 | RC | Release Candidate
Read by 33,067 user(s) | Add comment | Link to this article TWEET THIS


Article rating:
Very Good (4.4/5) 24 vote(s)    

Subscribe to news | Print article | Send to friend

© Copyright 2001-2009 Softpedia
Contact:

 

 

SEARCH THE NEWS ARCHIVE :




Today's News
| Yesterday's News | News Archive


MORE RELATED ARTICLES:


Windows Sysinternals for Windows 7 Beta and RC Branch Builds

Download Windows 7 Themes and Wallpapers Straight from Microsoft

Windows 7 Beta - Feeding the Multi-Touch Hunger

Download Microsoft Application Request Routing 1.0

New Windows and Linux Marriage via Microsoft and Red Hat

IE8 RC Protect Mode Disabled by Default

Build a Monster Windows 7 Start Menu to Dwarf Vista's

Microsoft Pushes Mobile Phones in the Cloud

User opinions:


Comment #1 by: A little birdie on 18 Feb 2009, 20:23 GMT reply to this comment

Sorry to say, but this is not a real build. You've been duped.


Comment #2 by: Steve on 18 Feb 2009, 21:08 GMT reply to this comment

What are the "Various sources, especially enthusiasts on Windows-centric forums"?


Comment #3 by: boe on 18 Feb 2009, 22:49 GMT reply to this comment

While I really really want something better than Vista or at least as good as XP - this is bad news in my opinion. There is no way MS fixed all the issues with Windows 7 beta.


Although I think it is a clear step above Vista, I've got a list of issues with Windows 7 after serious testing.

I like Windows 7 but I have some concerns that I'd like addressed before final release

First thing - EVERYONE I spoke to even at the MS booth at CES said they want the UP FOLDER back in explorer - yes there are other ways to go back one folder but the up folder was convenient.

Classic start menu - not an option - classic start menu makes it easier to support clients if they have key components such as network properties and my computer on the desktop. I'm not saying it should be the default but why not make it an option as it was in Windows XP and Vista? I realize you can put some icons on the desktop (not IE) using personalize.

Media Center won't let you click on album art cover once a song is already playing to play the new song from the album art cover. Seems only logical.

Media Center - often has static in playback - using Audigy 2z sound card.

Search works well but it would be great if the search in the start menu had a drop down just like run has in the start menu so you can repeat a search from your search history.

Aero interface stops working without message so flip 3d stops with alt-tab - using the troubleshooting fix sometimes solves it by enabling desktop manager - sometimes it can't - how do you manually enable Windows desktop manager - personalize desktop works but nothing to control the aero interface

Since most current receivers and other media streaming capable devices will support .flac file playback, it seems a shame not to use the native media player in windows as a media streaming server - instead because windows does not natively support flac playback, we have to look at alternative hardware streaming solutions or mediaplayers similar to windows media player but with flac support such as tversity or Twonky or Nero

Winver does not tell you if you are running 64 or 32 bit - computer properties would be improved if 64 or 32 bit was listed in the top section. It never states if you are installing the 32 or 64 bit version during installation.

It would be nice if it was easy to see what version and build of windows you were running by going to computer properties or by running winver - currently it tells you Windows Version 6.1 - Build 70000 - it doesn't say 7000 x64 081212-1400

During Install if you attempt to install with a brand new drive it won't install until you format the drive and reboot.

There is no desktop icon for IE - this was very handy for clear items and change settings etc before going into IE.

Do something with the 200 MB partion in disk manager so it is clear that it is a restore point or whatever - change the color of it, just make it more clearly defined.


Comment #4 by: wguimb on 20 Feb 2009, 05:45 GMT reply to this comment

Build 7048 was a rumor that turned out to be false. This has been confirmed by a source at Microsoft. The latest build is 7046 being tested by internal staff, the Windows Team, vendors, and private beta testers. Only build 7000 has been officially released to the public.


Comment #5 by: Geir Ove on 27 Feb 2009, 17:52 GMT reply to this comment

Build 7048 exist. Ive seen it on a microsoft employees computer.


Comment #6 by: Derek on 05 Mar 2009, 11:35 GMT reply to this comment

I dont know if any one has bothered to recheck but 7048 is as reas as 7022...all the big windows guys got that build. Ever heard of paul thurrott?


Comment #7 by: Charles Etheridge on 11 Mar 2009, 15:30 GMT reply to this comment

I got Windows 7 on the day that the servers came back up, 1/10/2009. Will I be able to access build 7048 as an update? If so, from which site? Thanks.


Comment #8 by: Lucas on 11 Mar 2009, 21:03 GMT reply to this comment

today i installed a leaked 7048.winmain.090219-1845 (x64). it has all the changed i've seen mentioned elsewhere for 7048, although not all the changed that will be in RC


Comment #9 by: wguimb on 15 Apr 2009, 06:38 GMT reply to this comment

6.1.7048.0.x86fre.winmain.090219-1845 eventually leaked and I also installed it. It is a build on the road to RC, but not the RC build itself.

The next build to leak was as follows and I installed and tested it.
6.1.7057.0.090305-2000_x86fre_client_en-us_Retail_Ultimate-GB1CULFRER_EN_DVD
6.1.7057.0.090305-2000_x64fre_client_en-us_Retail_Ultimate-GB1CULXFRER_EN_DVD

The next build to leak was as follows and I installed and tested it.
6.1.7068.0.090321-1322_x86fre_client_en-us_Retail_Ultimate-GRC1CULFRE_EN_DVD

The next build to leak was as follows and I installed and tested it.
6.1.7077.0.090404-1255_x86fre_client_en-us_Retail_Ultimate-GRC1CULFRER_EN_DVD

Build 7077 both x86 and x64 are the best performing and the most stable I have tested. I started testing with build 6801 (I think that was it). I have tested every build released or leaked since.

7077 is the build designated the first escrow build for release candidate compiled on 4-4-2009, with six followup builds in escrow since, which brings it to yesterdays' build 7083. No additional code changes are expected for this winmain_win7rc branch (unless a glaring bug is found) as they work toward an expected RC build 7100 in May.

7105 was created about the same time from winmain to form the release to manufacturing (RTM) branch and allow additional development in parallel to RC. The final RTM will be announced somewhere between July and September and I speculate it will be build 7700.


Comment #10 by: Grant Burtt on 21 Apr 2009, 15:53 GMT reply to this comment

I have been using Windows 7 x64 Build 6.1 7077 Rc Escrow since it was
posted and have had no problems with incompatabilities except for Nvidia Graphics card driversBUT the drivers suplied with the OS are completely stable and i have been able to run a Futuremark 3D mark on the system wich means that microsoft have added most of the driver support for this. It great. at the moment i WAS using a Mac that i only got 2 months ago and was running vista and windows XP in Bootcamp but i am going to migrate back to all OPC power as these syetems i have found to run much faster and smoother than a clunky old mac technology. Mac No upgradeability. back to the build I have downloaded 7110 x86 but really want to wait for the x64 vewrsion i see no point in going backwards as all the PCs i do have are X64. the system i have is ASUS Striker Formula 8GB 1066DDR2 Intel Qx9850 Crucial PI 2X EVGA Nvidia 295 In sli 4 X 1.5 TB Seagate 7200 12, Sound ASUS Supreme HD FX Logitech DiNovo Edge Logitech Revolition MX. Logitech QC Pro 9000. all drivers and software I have installed NERO 8 Works Fine.
MS Office Pro 2007.
Miro Itunes
netmeter
Avast Antivirus
Adobe Acrobat readetr 9
Adobe Acrobat 9
Adobe acrobat Pro 9
DiVx
Winfast PVR2
Wionzip 11.1
logitech Setpont Soft
ASUS PC Probe
ASUS AI Booster
DVD Shrink 32
Windows Live Essentials
Adobe Photoshop 9
Windows Moviemaker

Share your opinion:

Your Name:
Your Email Address:
(will not be used for commercial purposes)
Solve this to prove you're not a bot: =
Your review/opinion:

 




Windows tabGames tabDrivers tabMac tabLinux tabScripts tabMobile tabHandheld tabGadgets tabNews tab

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   ENTER NEWS SITE   |   ENGLISH BOARD   |   ROMANIAN FORUM