NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home / News / Microsoft

Microsoft


Will Microsoft Permit Symantec to Take Over Vista's UAC?

The Redmond Company is keeping quiet on the issue

By Marius Oiaga, Technology News Editor

11th of January 2007, 15:57 GMT

Adjust text size:


Symantec is currently developing prototypes of a technology that will circumvent the User Account Control feature in Windows Vista. If Symantec gets its way, Vista users will no longer be
prompted by UAC requests, as the Cupertino-based security company aims to take the end user out of the User Account Control equation and automate it.

Following the initial announcement by Symantec, the initiate has received negative feedback. This although Microsoft has failed to make any official comments as yet. Two influential Microsoft bloggers have spoken out against Symantec taking over Vista's UAC.

"Symantec seems to think that UAC prompts are a big enough problem that they are looking into designing software that could answer them for you. Now to me this seem to be really short sighted. Even if they can succeed in inserting into the UAC process, which I doubt they can, this would just serve to perpetuate a problem with security that has plagued Windows. Microsoft has taken a huge step in increasing Windows overall security and this technology can only undermine its effectiveness," commented Josh Phillips over at WindowsConnected.

"Symantec should spend less time circumventing existing Windows security features (through workarounds intentional or otherwise) and start coming up with ways to actually make my computer more secure. What a novel concept," said Robert McLaws over at WindowsNow.

Although Microsoft has kept quiet as far, it will not stand for Symantec's interference into the functionality of Windows Vista, especially into UAC, as this is one of the security aspects of the operating system. Symantec's argument on automated control over the UAC is that it will reduce annoyances and eliminate social engineering schemes. And as software is inherently faulty, Symantec's vision is that of a lesser evil. It would be interesting to see Microsoft's response to this.
Read by 1,667 user(s) | Add comment | Link to this article TWEET THIS


Article rating:
Good (3.1/5) 6 vote(s)    

Subscribe to news | Print article | Send to friend

© Copyright 2001-2009 Softpedia
Contact:

 

 

SEARCH THE NEWS ARCHIVE :




Today's News
| Yesterday's News | News Archive


MORE RELATED ARTICLES:


Vista Will Not Guarantee Protection against Malware

Swap the Behavior of the Windows Vista Power Button

Zip and Unzip in Windows Vista

Microsoft Still Supports Windows Vista Beta

Life After Windows Vista

Take Control of the Vista Explorer

Windows Fiji - The Next Version of Windows

Symantec Explains the Vista CSRSS Vulnerability

User opinions:


Comment #1 by: Paul on 27 Apr 2009, 13:15 GMT reply to this comment

I disagree.

The constant nature of vista constanly asking permission for apps that will in ALLL cases be 'yes' means that there should be some mannner of automating some of the permissions.

As it is I now run enough apps that its becoming a useless feature because I will end up turning uac off or go to a non-microsoft OS.

Fortunately LInux & OSX are good enough to replace Windows with no real problems for me.

If MS refuses to put in some sort of automation on this, then somebody else should.


Comment #2 by: Paul on 27 Apr 2009, 13:17 GMT reply to this comment

Note, that automating uac doesnt reduce security it will in fact increase it.

Too many users are now turning uac off in full instead of using it because it is in fact good security that now gets in the way of actually usage.

Its like having 'safe computing' by keeping the computer turned off.

Share your opinion:

Your Name:
Your Email Address:
(will not be used for commercial purposes)
Solve this to prove you're not a bot: =
Your review/opinion:

 




Windows tabGames tabDrivers tabMac tabLinux tabScripts tabMobile tabHandheld tabGadgets tabNews tab

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   ENTER NEWS SITE   |   ENGLISH BOARD   |   ROMANIAN FORUM