Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
TRENDING TODAY
Home > News > Webmaster > Internet Life

January 17th, 2012, 11:04 GMT · By

Wikipedia's Misguided Blackout in Protest of SOPA Approved

SHARE:

Adjust text size:

Wikipedia will be taken down for an entire day in protest to SOPA
Enlarge picture
Wikipedia is going ahead with plans to take down the entire English site in protest to the SOPA and PIPA anti-piracy bills. The English Wikipedia will be inaccessible for a full day on January 18th, not just for those in the US, but globally.

Wikipedia argues that this is needed to raise awareness of the issues and the bills which threaten the very existence of the web as we know it. It believes that the drastic move is necessary for the biggest effect.

"In an unprecedented decision, the Wikipedia community has chosen to blackout the English version of Wikipedia for 24 hours, in protest against proposed legislation in the United States," Wikipedia announced.

The interesting part is that Wikipedia argues that it was the decision of the community since many got involved in the discussion.

"Over the course of the past 72 hours, over 1800 Wikipedians have joined together to discuss proposed actions that the community might wish to take against SOPA and PIPA. This is by far the largest level of participation in a community discussion ever seen on Wikipedia," Wikipedia wrote.

"The overwhelming majority of participants support community action to encourage greater public action in response to these two bills," it said.

While the issue may have indeed been one of the most discussed at Wikipedia, 1,800 people is by no means representative of the Wikipedia community which is made up by hundreds of millions of people, the readers.

The vast majority of those do not engage in internal Wikipedia discussions, they are not even aware they exist. What's more, it makes perfect sense for the people that are concerned about SOPA the most to be the ones joining the Wikipedia discussion. The decision then was hardly representative of those that would be affected by it.

Still, Wikipedia did recognize the issues surrounding the decision, one being that this is a matter that affects the US alone or primarily and the second being that Wikipedia should not get engaged in political debate.

Simply put, Wikipedia does not have the right to deprive millions of people of the information they themselves put there or for which they have paid, through donations. The millions of people that contribute money to the site each year to ensure that it can continue to serve as a neutral party have the right to access the information which they've come to expect from the site.

Wikipedia is now setting a precedent and it's setting itself up for further criticism down the road. Any issue that people feel strongly about but for which Wikipedia doesn't take down the site will be deemed less important than SOPA, as Paul Carr eloquently writes.

SOPA and PIPA are certainly dangerous. And some form of protest should be OK even for Wikipedia. But taking down the entire site is not the option. A simple banner, like the one Wikipedia is running right now to announce the blackout would have sufficed.


2,674 hits · 8 comments
Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


Google, Bing Celebrate Romanian National Day

Google Will (Probably) Continue to Fund Firefox, Regardless of Doomsday Scenarios

Google's Wikipedia Killer Knol Is Dead, but WordPress.com Would Love to Have You

Jimmy Wales Is Creeping People Out on Wikipedia Again, Pay Up for Him to Go Away

Wikipedia Receives $500,000, €370,000 from Google's Sergey Brin and His Wife

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: Me on 17 Jan 2012, 15:31 UTC reply to this comment

i disagree, i think they are doing an excellent job. if you'd have read both press statements from the Foundation, you'd have seen the argument about the legal framework needed to operate the site. in my opinion, that argument surpasses everything you've written here.


Comment #2 by: Sid_7 on 17 Jan 2012, 16:26 UTC reply to this comment

I thoroughly disagree with Mr. Lucian Parfani. It will serve to give the strongest message possible. Infact, we'll also get a taste of things to come if such draconian laws get enacted - not just affecting the US, but the whole world.
For those missing out on the website's services, it gives us an opportunity to understand the significance of Wikipedia. Otherwise, too often, people start taking things for granted & do not appreciate or cherish what they have.


Comment #3 by: Baldi on 18 Jan 2012, 02:56 UTC reply to this comment

Mr Parfeni, why is your opinion on this more important than the opinion of the people who decided to take it down for a day?


Comment #4 by: Boethius on 18 Jan 2012, 05:22 UTC reply to this comment

I agree. All this blackout has done has irritated me. I'm not spending time looking up SOAP or whatever the stupid bill is called, I'm looking for alternative sites to answer some otherwise simple questions I had.

Comment #4.1 by: TRUTH on 19 Jan 2012, 16:07 GMT

Typical sheep. Happy to sit back and ignore the real world happenings as long as they are unnafected.


Comment #5 by: up yours commie on 18 Jan 2012, 05:52 UTC reply to this comment

No, it is a warning showing that this is what the Internet will turn into. If you are not aware, the US seems to believe that it owns the Internet. This does not just affect the Internet in the US it affects THE INTERNET INTERNATIONALLY! If the issue is not about taking down the Internet IT IS LESS IMPORTANT! Wikipedia's home is the Internet, it does not exist on paper therefore it's first duty should be to helping itself survive. Simpleton!

Comment #5.1 by: Andree on 19 Jan 2012, 17:20 GMT

I agree with most of the comments as this measure was taken to show that settling in conformism with these mediocre laws will cause the fall of most open content websites like wikipedia. I'm not from the U.S. and it appears that I'm as concerned as you in the matter because I know that the consecuences will be nationless and even more the economical consecuences will be a total chaos.


Comment #6 by: Zecrag on 19 Jan 2012, 22:39 UTC reply to this comment

I have to disagree with Lucian Parfeni and Paul Carr. Although I understand the problem with wikipedia taking a stance (when, by their own rules, they should be neutral in every matter) this case must be regarded as an exception for one simple fact: SOPA would possibly make able for some of the information on Wikipedia to be censored, so the website was obliged to take a stance to protect itself. Furthermore, if one would be attentive enough to read the complete message showed by Wikipedia on the 18th, he would find instructions on how to bypass the blockage and use the Wiki normally. They didn't take the Wiki offline, they were merely forcing the user to read they appeal.

Copyright © 2001-2013 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM