Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Webmaster > Internet Life

July 26th, 2010, 08:20 GMT · By

Wikileaks Reveals Over 90,000 Afganistan War Documents

SHARE:

Adjust text size:


Wikileaks has revealed the largest leak of its kind in history
Enlarge picture
With Wikileaks struggling to stay afloat and find funding and with one of its alleged sources up for trial in the US, some had been heralding the demise of the site. But it looks like Julian Assage and company were just getting started, over the weekend the site has disclosed some 92,000 US military documents regarding the war in Afganistan. It’s being labeled as the biggest leak in history and compared to the Pentagon Papers on the Vietnam War revealed in 1971.

Wikileaks has been in possession of the documents for a few months now and made them available about a month ago to the New York Times, The Guardian, and Der Spiegel. The three newspapers have worked together on sifting through the tens of thousands of documents and have now started publishing comprehensive reports based on them.

Some of the info was already known, but the documents paint a much grimmer picture of the war than what has been revealed by the Pentagon or the media so far. They describe civilian killings as well as suspicions of the Pentagon that the Taliban are getting help from Pakistan and possibly Iran.

Predictably, the US military has been highly critical of the leaks calling them irresponsible and saying that the documents put American lives at risk. However, Wikileaks says that it has withheld some 15,000 documents it also has in its possession which are more sensitive in nature than the ones released. The site will reveal those documents as well, but with some of the names or other data censored so as not to jeopardize current operations or put people at risk. Eventually, all of the documents will be released in full.

The source of the leaks is unknown, but one possibility is Army Spc. Bradley Manning who has been accused of leaking confidential documents on the war in Afganistan and other military operations. He is believed to be the source of a video showing an US military helicopter killing several civilians including two Reuters employees and is currently facing trial in the US.
FILED UNDER:
Wikileaks
Afganistan
wiki

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

1,876 hits · 1 comment · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


US Intelligence Analyst Arrested over Wikileaks Video

Alleged Wikileaks Source Formally Charged

Iceland Moves Forward with Plans to Create Journalism Haven

GoogleCL, Command-Line Tools for Google Services

Add-ons Don’t Require a Restart with Jetpack SDK 0.4 for Firefox

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: Eric on 26 Jul 2010, 19:38 UTC reply to this comment

The government had better not even try to pull the "national security" card!

When we send people to war, guess who pays the price? The sons and daughters of the electorate, young people that signed up to serve the country in the armed forces. We pay the ultimate price for war; sending people to die, and sending people to kill.

Sometimes, this is unavoidable and war is the only way to protect the country. However, when the government lies about the war or hides the truth, we *should* be outraged as a nation. We commit trillions of tax dollars to the war (which are sorely needed at home right now), and even more important we send our nation's youth to fight, kill, and die, and the government doesn't even paint an accurate picture of the war?!

Call me crazy, but that doesn't sound very much like a free society to me. War is the ultimate sacrifice a nation can make, we have every right to know when civilians are accidentally killed or when the war isn't going as well as we'd like.

They say these leaks put American lives at risk. You know what really puts American lives at risk? Lying about circumstances of the war so the American public will be ignorant and won't be able to make informed decisions as voters. War itself puts American lives at risk, and if the facts of the war are not being reported, then the military and government itself are not acting in the interest of their democracy, they are doing their own thing with no accountability. We simply cannot claim to be a shining beacon of democracy on one hand and on the other hide important information from voters just because "it isn't good" or "people would overreact".

When information is withheld from the public, the public is not equipped to make decisions on how the nation should be run. How can I vote on a candidate to lead this nation when I do not even know that truth about something so important as a war?

I'm not saying this entire war is being lied about, but with something so important as people's lives, I'm glad these documents got leaked.

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM