Search Perform an advanced search query SOFTPEDIA
 
SOFTPEDIA
Updated one minute ago
HomeSubmit a program for being reviewedAdvertise on our websiteGet help on surfing our websitesSend us your feedbackGet information about our XML/RSS backend and how to use itBrowse the news archiveVisit our discussion forumVizitati forumul in limba romana



KLIP
  1. HOME
  2. SCIENCE
  3. TECHNOLOGY
  4. WEBMASTER
  5. SECURITY
  6. MICROSOFT
  7. LINUX
  8. APPLE
  9. GAMES
  10. TELECOMS
  11. REVIEWS
  12. LIFE & STYLE
  13. EDITORIALS
  14. INTERVIEWS
  15. RSS
Welcome!
Hello, Guest

Login if you have a Softpedia.com account.

Otherwise, register for one.

MUSIC

Why Would Anyone Allow Sharon and Ozzie to Spoil It?

- Next year's BRIT Awards will probably register the largest amount of live swearing ever...

By: Monica Gaza, Entertainment News Editor

The people behind the BRIT awards (which is largely acknowledged as Britain's most prestigious music awards ceremony) seem to have developed a bit of a death wish, or at least an honest desire to shoot themselves in the foot big time. Otherwise I can't quite understand the reasons (or lack of reason, actually) for which they decided to contract none other than disgruntled rocker Ozzy Osbourne and his tantrum-throwing wife Sharon to host next year's Awards.

I always thought that smart people learn from their
mistakes, and boy, the BRITs sure had their fair share of horrific performances, the worst of which happened in 1989, when Samantha Fox and Mick Fleetwood hosted a terrible show in which just about everything went wrong - lines were fluffed, bands mis-cued, and airtime filled with embarrassing silence. After this the show was recorded, and broadcast the following night – until this year, when comic Russell Brand took over hosting duties. Despite being considered an overall success, Russell still sparked more than 500 complaints when he made risqué references to "intimate parts of the human body", drugs, Iraq and Queen Elizabeth and swore before the high-profile audience.

The ceremony will be broadcast live on ITV, but will have a five second delay to allow producers to bleep out the (inevitably huge, I'd say) amount of swearing that is likely to come from the foul-mouthed couple. After 9pm, the ceremony is set to be screened completely live – and God have mercy on our ears. I must confess, not that I got used to the idea, I'm quite looking forward to the show next February – it's always funny to watch people make deliberate fools of themselves. The reason behind the madness? BRITs bosses hope the 58-year-old rocker and his outspoken wife will bring a touch of "rock'n'roll, glamor, humor and the unexpected" to the ceremony on February 20th 2008, and the couple are "honored" to have been chosen for the role.

"Ozzy and I have been asked to host many awards shows in the past but this is by far the most prestigious and meaningful, especially for Ozzy as it's about the music. Ozzy and I are proud to be Brits and are both incredibly honored to have been asked to help celebrate the best in music". That all sounds all right, until we remember it comes from a woman who stated that her hubby's penis should replace the Duracell bunny, because it won't stop banging. Um, see the connection?


MORE RELATED ARTICLES: The SeX Files Reloaded: Which Rock Star's Penis Could Soon Replace Duracell Batteries? Jack Osbourne Was Intimate with Paris Hilton Sharon Osbourne Doesn't Cry for Her Daughter – Her Dog Is Much More Important Don't Piss Off Sharon Osbourne or She'll Send You Dog Pooh for Christmas Kelly Osbourne Eloped! Sharon Osbourne Is Disgusting Kelly Osbourne Swallows Her Own Vomit Jack and Kelly Osbourne Got the Best Gifts Ever: Strippers Google Delivers Wake-Up Call to the Dormant Microsoft Not Enough Photoshop to Make Kelly Osbourne 'Playboy' Material
 
Comments | Link here | Subscribe
Print | Send to friend
Today's News | Yesterday's News

Search:


3rd December 2007, 10:35 GMT | Copyright (c) 2007 Softpedia | Contact:
Read by 279 user(s) | Rating: | 5 vote(s) so far | Cast your vote:
Why Would Anyone Allow Sharon and Ozzie to Spoil It? - USER OPINIONS




We are sorry, there are no opinions available for this article.






SHARE YOUR OPINION ABOUT Why Would Anyone Allow Sharon and Ozzie to Spoil It?

Since you are not logged on, your comments will have to be approved before being displayed.
Click here to login, or register.
Your Name:
Your Email:
Type in the result:
Your Opinion:
 


DO YOU WANT TO CONTACT US?  

If you have some comments or you want to send us some information you can send us an email directly to .
You can use the form below for the same purpose.
Your full name: (at least 3 characters)
Your email address: (at least 5 characters)
Message subject: (at least 5 characters)
Message text:
(at least 10 characters)
Type in the result:
 
 



© 2001 - 2008 Softpedia. All rights reserved.
Softpedia™ and Softpedia™ logo are registered trademarks of SoftNews NET SRL.
Copyright Information | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Contact Softpedia | Update your software | Archive