Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Microsoft > Internet Explorer

January 27th, 2009, 16:00 GMT · By

Why EU Won't Force Microsoft to Bundle Firefox with Windows

SHARE:

Adjust text size:


Firefox
Enlarge picture
On January 15, 2009, the European Antitrust Commission sent a Statement of Objections to Microsoft, informing the company of its preliminary view generated by a 2008 complaint from browser maker Opera that the bundling of Internet Explorer into Windows violated EU anti-monopoly law. The Redmond company confirmed the Statement of Objections and the Commission's perspective that the inclusion of IE into Windows since 1996 had violated European competition law. Additionally, the software giant presented some possible outcomes to going head-to-head against the EU antitrust regulators in its quarterly filing with the Security and Exchange Commission. These outcomes have led some to erroneously believe that the EU would somehow end up forcing Microsoft to bundle Firefox alongside Internet Explorer into Windows.

Can you say pipe dream? First off let's see what the EU Commission stated. “If the preliminary views expressed in the SO are confirmed, the Commission may impose a fine on Microsoft, require Microsoft to cease the abuse and impose a remedy that would restore genuine consumer choice and enable competition on the merits.”

There's no mention of Firefox whatsoever. Or any browser, for that matter. There is, however, the specification of a remedy. This is where Microsoft comes in with additional details. “The statement of objections seeks to impose a remedy that is different than the remedy imposed in the earlier proceeding concerning Windows Media Player,” the company said.

The EU did state that coupling IE with Windows infringed the EC Treaty rules on abuse of a dominant position (Article 82), by taking advantage of the operating system's market share.

However, according to the software giant, the Commission is not looking to remove Internet Explorer from Windows, as it has done with Windows Media Player from the N editions of the platform, which are only available in the EU, alongside full-featured editions. But from not removing IE to adding Firefox is a long way, by any stretch of the imagination.

“While computer users and OEMs are already free to run any Web browsing software on Windows, the Commission is considering ordering Microsoft and OEMs to obligate users to choose a particular browser when setting up a new PC. Such a remedy might include a requirement that OEMs distribute multiple browsers on new Windows-based PCs. We may also be required to disable certain unspecified Internet Explorer software code if a user chooses a competing browser,” Microsoft continued.

At best, EU will force the Redmond giant to set in place a generic mechanism, which, when the operating system will connect for the first time to the Internet, will permit end-users to choose from an array of available software, including Internet Explorer, Firefox, Opera, Google Chrome, etc., in order to determine which will be the default browser for their copy of Windows. In order for you to get an idea of what might be cooking for future versions of Windows, simply think of the way that Internet Explorer and additional modern browsers permit the users to choose the default search engine.

A similar model can be applied to the next generation Windows operating system, while Microsoft might be indeed forced to uninstall, or disable Internet Explorer. According to the Redmond company, OEMs might also have a role to play in this, by being forced to provide multiple choices for end-users.

However, do not lose sight of what the EU is attempting to do. The Antitrust Commission is simply seeking to provide additional choices to end-users. Firefox on top of IE is by no means an additional choice. It is absurd to think that the EU will decide that Microsoft should install Firefox over Opera, or Google Chrome, or any other browser, thus limiting itself as a choice for consumers. It makes much more sense for the company to offer a solution capable of permitting end-users to connect to the Internet and download and install the browser of their choice.

Opera 10.0 Build 1229 Alpha / 9.63 is available for download here.

Firefox 3.1 Beta 2 / 3.0.5 / 2.0.0.20 is available for download here.

Google Chrome 2.0 is available for download here.

Internet Explorer 8 (IE8) Release Candidate 1 (RC1) is available for download here.

Internet Explorer 7 is available for download here.

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

2,617 hits · 2 comments · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


Windows Live Messenger Library 2.5 to Rule Them All

Windows Live Messenger IM Control New Features Coming Soon

Google Drives Extra Nail in the Coffin of Firefox 2.0

Intelligent Application Gateway 2007 Free Download

Firefox 3.1 Beta 3 Says Niet to Google in Russia

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: Nikolai on 20 Feb 2009, 07:01 UTC reply to this comment

Why exactly are FF, Chrome, Safari, or the host of other free and easy to install browsers not a choice? And don't give some arcane jibber about operating system integration. Say something my mother-in-law will understand and care about. She doesn't know or care if this or that system component uses IE to render html or if this or that dll is lurking somewhere in her system32 directory. For her, other browsers are absolutely a choice, and available for free in a dozen clicks. It's harder for her to switch contact lens brands than it is browsers. Seriously, guys, how low does the bar have to be here?

And how does making her jump through another hoop when buying or installing the computer, during which she will just choose the default anyway, increase her choices? She'll end up with IE anyway, at the cost of an extra click. Or shall the EU decree that someone else gets to be the default choice? Who gets that honor, and why?

And even if they did, and FireFox goes to 80% market share overnight, how has that really helped anyone? Please try to cast aside your prejudices here and answer honestly. We're talking about competition in a market that offers its product for free and where, quite evidently, almost no one cares about the winner. Otherwise simple inertia couldn't be enough to keep users on IE.

But that's not what this is about. Mozilla and Opera have had years to build a better mousetrap, but it seems that nothing they've done is worth a dozen clicks to most people. So they need to snivel and whine and run to the only court in the world that they know is silly enough to entertain this nonsense.

If you can't beat 'em, sue 'em. That's what this is about.

Comment #1.1 by: rautamiekka on 25 Apr 2011, 14:34 GMT

People will start caring when IE kills their life in addition to the computer.

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM