Search Perform an advanced search query SOFTPEDIA
 
SOFTPEDIA
Updated one minute ago
HomeSubmit a program for being reviewedAdvertise on our websiteGet help on surfing our websitesSend us your feedbackGet information about our XML/RSS backend and how to use itBrowse the news archiveVisit our discussion forumVizitati forumul in limba romana



KLIP
  1. HOME
  2. SCIENCE
  3. TECHNOLOGY
  4. WEBMASTER
  5. SECURITY
  6. MICROSOFT
  7. LINUX
  8. APPLE
  9. GAMES
  10. TELECOMS
  11. REVIEWS
  12. LIFE & STYLE
  13. EDITORIALS
  14. INTERVIEWS
  15. RSS
Welcome!
Hello, Guest

Login if you have a Softpedia.com account.

Otherwise, register for one.

SPACE

Why Didn't The Americans Adopt the Metric System?

- Why haven't they adopted it yet?

By: Lucian Dorneanu, Science Editor

Feet, yards, inches, miles, gallons, ounces, these may mean something to some people around the world, while others struggle with online converters or, worse, software designed to convert these values, that are not reliable most of the times.

How about fathoms, rods, chains, furlongs, leagues?
Did anybody hear about these strange measuring units? The US is a powerful nation, a "model of democracy" and an economic standard that most countries would like to follow.

While English has gradually imposed itself as the most used language in many fields, starting with the IT, there is one thing not many people wanted to adopt: their measuring system.

Of course, they're not the only country to stick to the old system, but while some countries still use feet and miles, although they officially adopted the International System of Units, the US are among the only three countries that never adopted this system, the other two being Liberia and Myanmar.

Since the 1960s, the International System of Units (SI) ("Systéme International d'Unités" in French, hence "SI") has been the internationally recognized standard metric system. Metric units of mass, length, and electricity are widely used around the world for both everyday and scientific purposes.

They have been designed to provide a single unit for any physical quantity, thus eliminating the need for conversion factors when making calculations with physical quantities. Another advantage of the unified metric system is the fact that multiples and submultiples are related to the fundamental unit by factors of powers of ten, so that one can convert by simply moving the decimal place: 1.234 meters is 1234 millimeters, 0.001234 kilometers etc.

I can tell you that in a scientific paper the effort of converting the measuring units from the international system to the one used in the US can give you serious headaches and are sometimes as complicated as the mathematical calculations in the first place.

If you don't believe me, just try these experiments. Transforming the following values from one measuring system to the other can make you scream, and not Eureka!

Just a few examples: what is the mileage of a car that uses 8,7 liters of fuel per one hundred kilometres? What is a pressure value of 174 pounds per square inch transformed to kilograms per square meter? How much is a density of 1,6 grams per cubic centimeter transformed to pounds per cubic foot?

This is one thing I'll never understand. No wait, there's also the thing with the spelling differences and synonyms from British to US English... What should I wear, a pair of green trousers or one of kaki pants?

MORE RELATED ARTICLES: Measuring Oscillations Associated with Photon Entanglement Storing Hydrogen in Carbon Nanohorns Superstrong Computer Chips Made with Carbon Nanotubes Future Metallic Superalloys Made from Nanoparticles First Calculations Carried Out Using Two Qubits Brings the Quantum Computer Closer Robot Will Act as MC at South Korean Wedding Solar Powered Air Conditioning Intel Chips Allow Your Computer to Be Remotely Operated Even When It's Turned Off World's Biggest Holographic Screen Follows Your Eyes The Next Generation of Jet Airplanes Could Travel at Mach 10
 
Comments | Link here | Subscribe
Print | Send to friend
Today's News | Yesterday's News

Search:


19th June 2007, 16:59 GMT | Copyright (c) 2007 Softpedia | Contact:
Read by 60,426 user(s) | Rating: | 24 vote(s) so far | Cast your vote:
Why Didn't The Americans Adopt the Metric System? - USER OPINIONS

Comment #1 by myrcea18 on 2007-06-20, 01:02 GMT reply to this comment 
But fortunately we have google.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&q=8.7+liters%2F100+km+in+mpg&btnG=Search or http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&q=8.7+liters%2F100+km+in+miles+per+uk+gallon&btnG=Search

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&hs=6FZ&q=174+pounds%2Fsquare+inch+in+kilograms%2Fsquare+meter&btnG=Search

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&hs=4aE&q=1%2C6+grams%2Fcubic+centimeter+in+pounds%2Fcubic+foot&btnG=Search

Comment #2 by buggers on 2007-06-20, 16:07 GMT reply to this comment 
You have to realize that all of industrial U. S. uses the English units, and it would be too hard to re-fit and re size all of their existing units. It would even be hard enough to do the same for just new units, because you would still have the problem of conversions when working with the old units. The English system will be used either until it is mandated to use or all industry gets wiped out in the U.S. (and Liberia and Myanmar) and we have to start from scratch.

Comment #3 by jimbobjoe on 2007-06-20, 16:31 GMT reply to this comment 
This is my theory: the right time for adoption passed. A standardized system of measurement was sought, particularly in the European countries, so, for example, everyone was trading in the same quantity of bananas. Inter-Europe trade, as well as engineers rebuilding post-world War 2 Europe made the push for metric. (Which is why England was the last country to make the switch, since they were isolated from the rest of Europe.)

The US was an island all onto itself, so trade wasn't dramatically affected by not using metric. The serious effort to go to metric hit in the late 1960s...but by the early 70's, some of the main proponents of metrification--engineers and other people who use units--became less interested. Why? Calculators. Once every engineer had an HP on their desk, the need for a base 10 universal measurement system became far less and people just didn't have the fire in their belly anymore.

According to my theory, we'll never switch now. It's easier to convert than to standardize.

Comment #4 by ljw2 on 2007-06-20, 16:41 GMT reply to this comment 
Use of miles does have advantages on US highways, in that most every major city west of the Mississippi river has their major streets layed out in a grid that is roughly one mile long by one mile long. Making all east/west and north south/interstate exits almost exactly on a mile apart for signage. Converting interstate exits to meters would introduce very odd fractions or inaccurate distances on signs due to 1 mile equaling 1.609 meters.

Reply #4.1 by Frank2225630 on 2007-06-20, 21:47 GMT
1 mile = 1.609 Kilometres.

Comment #5 by MrCoolio on 2007-06-20, 23:15 GMT reply to this comment 
I really understand what he's saying, i just for fun googled 8.7 liters/100 km to mpg. And it gave me the answer of ~27mpg. And then i actually looked for websites that referenced it. Up pops a site about BMW, which says that 8.7 liters/100km is equal to 22.5mpg. Obviously there are problems with conversion, And it just makes sense to switch.

Reply #5.1 by barsoom on 2007-06-20, 23:58 GMT
The problem here is that the BMW website being a European Company will be referencing Imperial Gallons rather than US Gallons. Not only does the US insist on using the old Imperial System they also arbitarily change the size of the units. The US Gallon is smaller than the actual Imperial Gallon therefore making a gas mileage of 22.5 mpg Imperial equal to ~27 mpg US.

Another sign of the arrogance of the US is that they (and Canada by default) are the only English speaking countries in the world that drive on the right side of the road.

Reply #5.2 by avfguy on 2007-06-21, 23:21 GMT
barsoom - This has nothing to do with the original article, but there are actually far more countries in the world that officially drive on the right than on the left - 74 drive on the left, 165 drive on the right. The only reason England doesn't drive on the right is because Napoleon never conquered it and forced it to change from the left-side driving established during the Roman Empire, to right-side driving which was the standard in France and which he forced all the other European countries he conquered to use.

So much for the American "arrogance" theory - I think the most obvious answer to the question in the article has been posted above. The US is full of manufacturing facilities that all have machines with the old measurements - and when you replace an old very expensive machine with a new very expensive machine, you're unlikely to change the metrics used because that would force a change to all the other very expensive machines used in your manufacturing process.

Comment #6 by o0flip0o on 2007-06-21, 16:26 GMT reply to this comment 
There was a metric board commissioned by Congress that ran through the Carter administration and was killed by Regain.
From the looks of it it was mandated under the Ford Admin without teeth and from the looks of it "made to fail" from before the very start.
Here's a summery:

http://lamar.colostate.edu/~hillger/laws/usmb.html


go to top


SHARE YOUR OPINION ABOUT Why Didn't The Americans Adopt the Metric System?

Since you are not logged on, your comments will have to be approved before being displayed.
Click here to login, or register.
Your Name:
Your Email:
Type in the result:
Your Opinion:
 


DO YOU WANT TO CONTACT US?  

If you have some comments or you want to send us some information you can send us an email directly to .
You can use the form below for the same purpose.
Your full name: (at least 3 characters)
Your email address: (at least 5 characters)
Message subject: (at least 5 characters)
Message text:
(at least 10 characters)
Type in the result:
 
 



© 2001 - 2008 Softpedia. All rights reserved.
Softpedia™ and Softpedia™ logo are registered trademarks of SoftNews NET SRL.
Copyright Information | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Contact Softpedia | Update your software | Archive