Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Games > Columns

August 27th, 2011, 12:21 GMT · By

Weekend Reading: EA's Origin, Valve's Steam and Programs as DRM

SHARE:

Adjust text size:


Origin is fighting against Steam
Enlarge picture
The last week has been dominated by an ongoing debate over an excerpt in the EULA (End User License Agreement) of Electronic Arts' new Origin digital distribution service, which will be mandatory for PC gamers who want to play all the upcoming titles from the company, like Battlefield 3 or Need for Speed: The Run.

The EULA highlighted that Origin may record and transmit data anonymously about the user's computer, programs or preferences to EA.

While I admit that it would've been decent for the program to offer a way of opting out this thing, like Valve is doing with its Steam surveys, the amount of hate, uproar and threats to boycott Origin has become a bit annoying, especially since many of the arguments of anti-EA protesters can easily be applied to Valve and its own Steam.

Many PC gamers are angry at EA because Origin needs to be running while they play any of the upcoming games like Battlefield 3 or Need for Speed: The Run. They seemingly forget that Steam does the exact same thing, because the program is used as a DRM (Digital Rights Management) software by publishers. As such, if you want to play games like Deus Ex: Human Revolution, Steam needs to be running, at least in its offline mode.

Others are angry because EA insists on growing Origin's userbase by forcing it down the throats of the many people who want to play its upcoming titles, including the aforementioned Battlefield 3. They probably forgot that Steam was also mandatory with one of the biggest games of the last decade, Half Life 2, as Valve saw fit to make the players use its own digital platform.

All of them shouldn't forget that Electronic Arts is running a business, so moving away from Valve's monopoly isn't a crazy move. In fact, it's using pretty much the same recipe the Half Life developer had with Steam, only applying it to its own titles.

Some issues, like the data collecting one above, will appear, as with the start of any project of this size, but PC gamers should at least give EA the benefit of the doubt. Who knows, maybe in a few years, Origin will become a natural part of playing games, just like Steam is at the moment.

What do you think? Is EA doing the right thing with Origin or should it abandon the whole project and just be content under Valve's Steam?

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

2,587 hits · 6 comments · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


Electronic Arts Plans Multiple Classic Game Revivals

Electronic Arts Admits Battlefield 3 Might Come Second to Modern Warfare 3

Electronic Arts Explains Why Battlefield 3 Won't Come to Steam

DICE Unveils Battlefield 3 Pre-Order Bonuses for North America

Electronic Arts Hopes for Agreements with Steam over Dragon Age 2 DLC Policy

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: Jhackler on 28 Aug 2011, 02:53 UTC reply to this comment

They should adjust the Eula plus people can always buy the game then get a cracked version if the program uses to much resources or bandwidth they don't want it too. Or for if the company goes under they have a back-up. But honestly, why do they need what programs I am running? allow opting-in for as optional don't require peoples info to play the game unless its free!


Comment #2 by: Eko on 28 Aug 2011, 08:20 UTC reply to this comment

Not buying. EVER. After C&C4 DRM fiasco, the Syndicate shooter revival, they can stuff Origin where it belongs: in their original arses!


Comment #3 by: painkiller1961 on 19 Oct 2011, 03:19 UTC reply to this comment

too bad it will be as hacked as bad as steam in the first month.
PC's love freedom and hate playing with consoles, two major reasons why DRM will never work.


Comment #4 by: noob on 10 Nov 2011, 02:49 UTC reply to this comment

1. Mac Compatibility... EADM was never compatible, origin isn't either.
2. I feel that since EA and Valve are almost partners in this, that they should put aside their differences, and choose one, not to say EA cant continue using Origin, but It would be best for them to just place it on steam so everyone can enjoy.


Comment #5 by: Maxx on 12 Nov 2011, 08:39 UTC reply to this comment

its good Steam is good Origin is also good. would be nice to still buy games on Steam with EA Titles this will support Steam and Help EA Games also and will not have BS DRM like Activation Limits.


Comment #6 by: nil on 14 Nov 2011, 19:27 UTC reply to this comment

Well, that's ridiculous for EA to leave a very big digital distributor (DD) like Steam; Steam is well-known and relatively safe DD; What's the point of creating an Origin for EA? For 10 titles? Oh, pardon 20, eh? ...

A couple days ago I've downloaded that monster Origin client (50Mb installed vs 1.7mb steam); GUI speed is very slow (no wonder, Qt is well known piece of s*it, pardon me); Totally non user-friendly, in my humble opinion;

Honestly, I'd like to play NFS:TR but I don't want to install the crap like Origin. Not because it's very heavy, slow and in very early stage of development ... I just don't want to have 12983741 DD clients running on my PC;

I don't understand why EA put lots of effort into "that";

P.S: Battlefield 3 will not save Origin; There just is nothing to do;

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM