NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home / News / Microsoft / Security

Security


Vista SP1 Infection Rate 60.6% Less than That of XP SP3

Microsoft reveals

By Marius Oiaga, Technology News Editor

8th of April 2009, 16:51 GMT

Adjust text size:


Windows Logos
Enlarge picture
Microsoft has applauded Windows Vista for its superior level of security compared to Windows XP since the operating system hit the shelves back in January 2007. But at the same time, the Redmond company has constantly provided statistics designed to back its claims, the latest of which come from the sixth volume of its Microsoft Security Intelligence Report (SIRv6). Specifically, by analyzing data collected by the Malicious Software Removal Tool, the software giant has concluded that: “The infection rate for Windows Vista is significantly lower than that of its predecessor, Windows XP, in all configurations.”

Yes, it is another way of saying that Windows Vista is more secure than Windows XP. Essentially, Microsoft indicated that MSRT had detected a 60.6% smaller infection rate for Windows Vista with Service Pack 1 compared to Windows XP SP3 in the second half of 2008. You can also have a look at the graphic included with this article, courtesy of the software giant, in order to “get the picture” of just how the volume of Vista infections compares with that of XP's.

“Comparing the n-1 service packs for each version, the infection rate of the release to manufacturing (RTM) version of Windows Vista is 71.5 percent less than that of Windows XP SP2,” Microsoft added in the report. “Comparing the RTM versions of these operating systems, the infection rate of the RTM version of Windows Vista is 89.1 percent less than that of the RTM version of Windows XP. Similarly, the infection rate of Windows Server 2008 RTM is 51.9 percent less than that of its predecessor, Windows Server 2003 SP2.”

Microsoft's findings reveal that, as end users make sure to upgrade to the latest Windows release available and to deploy the most recent service pack, the more secure they are, as the rate of infections is considerably smaller.

Number of computers cleaned for every 1,000 MSRT executions, by operating system, 2H08
Enlarge picture
The Redmond company explained that the situation was catalyzed because “service packs include fixes for all security vulnerabilities fixed in security updates at the time of issue. They can also include additional security features, mitigations, or changes to default settings to protect users. Users who install service packs may generally maintain their computers better than users who do not install service packs and therefore may also be more cautious in the way they browse the Internet, open attachments, and engage in other activities that can open computers to attack.”

Windows Vista Service Pack 1 (SP1) for both 32-bit and 64-bit versions of the operating system is available for download here.

Windows XP Service Pack 3 can be downloaded via this link.

TAGS:

Windows Vista | SP1 | Service Pack 1 | Windows XP | SP3
Read by 2,537 user(s) | Add comment | Link to this article TWEET THIS


Article rating:
Excellent (5.0/5) 4 vote(s)    

Subscribe to news | Print article | Send to friend

© Copyright 2001-2009 Softpedia
Contact:

 

 

SEARCH THE NEWS ARCHIVE :




Today's News
| Yesterday's News | News Archive


MORE RELATED ARTICLES:


Microsoft: Upgrade from Vista to Windows 7 RC

Microsoft Surface Games Pack Available for Download

Windows 7 Beta and pre-RC to Windows 7 RC Upgrades Blocked

Download Application Compatibility Toolkit 5.5 for Windows 7 RC

Forefront Stirling Security Suite Delayed

Old Malware Learning New Tricks from $250,000 Conficker Worm

Windows 7 vs. Vista, a Dell Perspective

User opinions:


Comment #1 by: gimpguy on 08 Apr 2009, 18:35 GMT reply to this comment

I'm sure Vista is more secure but let's look at it this way... IT SHOULD BE. Would they admit it even if it wasn't? A newer OS that is less secure than an older one? Come on! Hey, we pit Mike Tyson against Clint Eastwood and Mike won!! Hey, Mike is stronger, faster than Clint! DUH. "He better be" it's ridiculous to constantly compare against an older OS. XP was a good OS, so they keep beating it down when comparing to Vista?

Hey, let's kick down an older OS to make our newer crappy one look good!

A dog of a system which if not for extreme marketing wouldn't be even close to what XP was? Don't know the figures currently but late 2008, Vista was STILL playing catch up with XP "had a looonngg way to go to" and it's almost at the end of it's software life so to speak. XP blew ME away without the hype. I mean aren't there still like 70% or so of all enterprise PCs running XP? NOT Vista? Kill Vista already and let Win 7 be what Vista SHOULD have been.


Comment #2 by: College student on 10 Apr 2009, 20:16 GMT reply to this comment

Gimpguy says "Vista was STILL playing catch up with XP "had a looonngg way to go to" and it's almost at the end of it's software life so to speak. XP blew ME away without the hype. I mean aren't there still like 70% or so of all enterprise PCs running XP? NOT Vista?"
You know XP has been out for like a decade almost, so its obvious that Most of the world would have XP including the buisness sector. Of course Windows Vista has a long way to go till it captures more of the PC base, but you forget that no matter what OS it is it will always increase every year.
There are more and more Computer users every year so comparing the XP install base with Vista's is useless.
The Topic of this Article was about Vista being more Secure than XP, not about who sold more OS's. Get your stuff straight and stop this Fanboyism. I have both XP and Vista. I like them both. But your going to have to Upgrade sometime in the Future anyways.(lol to those who still have XP in 2020)


Comment #3 by: MG on 16 Apr 2009, 12:57 GMT reply to this comment

The low user adoption rate for vista, and the relative high adoption rate for windows XP ( still there are around 75 to 80% running XP versus Vista) play a big role in making vista more secure :)


Comment #4 by: blackdragonsdg on 17 Apr 2009, 21:52 GMT reply to this comment

Why do people insist on bashing Vista either through stupid XP comparisons or just out right hatred based on what others say. These people must have a very bad memory. I recall XP being the crap on the bottom of everyone's shoe till SP2 was released and from that point till now people seem to think it can do no wrong.
These Vista haters are the same group of people who will swear by Windows 7 but aren't bright enough to realize its the same OS with a different gui. And before anyone tries to rebuff that statement, Windows 7 is windows v6.1 not v7.xx, if you don't believe me then call Microsoft and ask them cause they will tell you the same thing.

Back to the original point of this article, Vista is easily more secure than XP SP200 ever will be. And for those who didn't get the previous statement, enjoy using XP for the next 50 years or until your discs are no longer readable.


Comment #5 by: Kerry on 05 May 2009, 14:54 GMT reply to this comment

I've seen so many older XP computers that are constantly infected; even with strong antivirus, limited accounts and current updates.

When I ran XP, because of all of the anti-Vista hype, I thought why would anyone running XP want to change to Vista. Then I got rootkitted. Now that I run Vista, I can't imagine why anyone would NOT want to upgrade from XP to Vista. Granted, older machines with limited memory and limited hard disk space are kinda stuck with XP.

If you look, however, you can see that Microsoft has been plotting a course. XP was very stable but lacked security. Vista has much better security and is also quite stable. I expect the next version of Windows to be stable, secure, and more lean.

In the mean time, I am very happy with Vista.

Share your opinion:

Your Name:
Your Email Address:
(will not be used for commercial purposes)
Solve this to prove you're not a bot: =
Your review/opinion:

 




Windows tabGames tabDrivers tabMac tabLinux tabScripts tabMobile tabHandheld tabGadgets tabNews tab

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   ENTER NEWS SITE   |   ENGLISH BOARD   |   ROMANIAN FORUM