Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Science > Nature

May 5th, 2010, 08:50 GMT · By

Vegetation Found to Be Contributing to Global Warming

SHARE:

Adjust text size:


Plants may actually be contributing to global warming, a new study finds
Enlarge picture
As common knowledge has it, plants and oceans are the main engines that absorb the dangerous greenhouse gas carbon dioxide (CO2) from our planet's atmosphere. Increased concentrations of the gas have been linked to the global warming effect that causes climate change, and so caring for Earth's natural carbon sinks should be very high on our priority list. But a new groundbreaking study throws serious doubts on this idea. The research would seem to suggest that plants actually contribute to global warming.

Researchers at the Carnegie Institution for Science (CIS) were behind the new investigation, which, if proven true beyond a reasonable doubt, could change the way we look at plants. Biologists say that vegetation is the only life form that can make photosynthesis, a process through which carbon dioxide and sunlight are converted into oxygen and energy. But the CIS study shows that existing CO2 levels actually make the plants work for global warming, and not against it, LiveScience reports.

“There is no longer any doubt that carbon dioxide decreases evaporative cooling by plants and that this decreased cooling adds to global warming. This effect would cause significant warming even if carbon dioxide were not a greenhouse gas,” explains CIS team member and scientist Long Cao. He is also a coauthor of the new investigation, details of which were published in the latest issue of the esteemed journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS). The group explains that the mechanisms through which plants contribute to the disastrous global phenomenon is not direct.

They say that increased temperatures and carbon dioxide levels force the plants to retain more water within their leaves. These amounts of water would have otherwise evaporated in the atmosphere, helping to cool it, and therefore reduce the intensity of global warming. The difference is apparently considerable, the team says. It has been estimated that water retention can increase local temperatures at certain locations by up to 25 percent above the levels caused by the greenhouse effect on its own. Statistics show that 16 percent of the temperature increase on land masses is attributable to water retention from plants, with the remaining 84 percent attributable to global warming.

“We need to take great care in considering what kind of changes we make to forests and other ecosystems, because they are likely to have important climate consequences,” explains Ken Caldeira, who is a coauthor of the PNAS paper, and also a scientist at CIS.

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

1,811 hits · 2 comments · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


Experts Formulate Strategy Against Global Warming

New Stations to Monitor Avalanches and Landslides

Microbes Have Little Influence on Global Warming

Source for Past Global Warming Event Found

Humans May Be Ushering in a New Geological Time

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: Orkneygal on 05 May 2010, 09:58 UTC reply to this comment

Fraudulent claims, using faked "Hockey Sticks", openly and aggressively violating Freedom of Information requests and conspiring to squash dissenting views by corrupting the peer review process, that's the type of work that some climate scientists have done to mislead the public about the causes and affects of our ever changing climate. On top of all that comes the admission by Dr. Jones that his tricked up temperature databases can’t be reproduced because he didn’t keep the notes of how he did the manipulations.

And the warmists call this irrefutable science.

Well, here is some real irrefutable science.

The overwhelming paleoclimate evidence from around the globe is that the Medieval Warm Period (MWP) was synchronous, world wide and much warmer than today.

However, the MWP deniers will never admit the existence of the MWP because it means that their religious-like belief in AGW is exposed for the steaming pile of junk science that it truly is.

In total, climate change is complex and not well understood.

But this part is simple.

Since the world was warmer when CO2 levels were lower, CO2 cannot be the earth's temperature regulator.

A thousand years ago, the Earth was warmer than it is today; before the social and industrial advances that have made modern people the healthiest and most prosperous in history. MWP deniers want us to believe that plant friendly and life giving CO2 is a bad thing to better advance their meglomanical desire to both boss around the developed world and further impoverish the poor while pocketing a lot of taxpayer money along the way.

Futile attempts at controlling carbon is not the answer to the ever changing climate.There is only one answer to changes in climate that has ever worked for humanity.

That is adaptation.

One of the many links to the overwhelming Paleoclimate evidence of the global nature of the MWP is below.

http://www.co2science.org/data/mwp/mwpp.php


Comment #2 by: jonny on 06 May 2010, 15:51 UTC reply to this comment

what a load of tosh! onoly the other day the AGW camp were claiming that increased water vapour leads to increased temperatures and now this report is claiming the opposite. I dont believe, no one i know believes it or will ever believe it! Get a life and stop wasting my time and money!

idiots

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM