Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Microsoft > Windows

May 13th, 2011, 14:13 GMT · By

Users Who Think XP Is Good Enough Need to See Infection Rates Compared to Windows 7

SHARE:

Adjust text size:


Windows 7
Enlarge picture
In excess of 350 million licenses of Windows 7 were sold in the 18 months passed since the platform hit GA, the first 300 million of which by the end of January 2011, but despite being the second most used OS on the market, Windows Vista’s successor is doing a far superior job at protecting users compared to Windows XP.

According to operating system usage statistics from Net Applications there are largely two XP users for each customer running Windows 7.

Yet, according to the recently launched Security Intelligence Report volume 10 from Microsoft, the infection rates for Windows 7 are dwarfed by those of the decade old operating system launched in 2001.

“Infection rates for more recently released operating systems and service packs are consistently lower than earlier ones, for both client and server platforms. Windows 7 and Windows Server 2008 R2, the most recently released Windows client and server versions, respectively, have the lowest infection rates,” the software giant stated.

Previous releases of SIR provided the same conclusions, but smaller market share could have been seen as contributing to lower Windows 7 infection rates.

But fact is that the uptake explosion for Windows 7 was not correlated with a similar increase in the volume of compromised computers.

The infection rate that Microsoft associates to Windows 7 in SIRv10 has been somewhat constant and remained under 4.0 since the end of 2009.

Infection rates
Enlarge picture
According to SIRv10, Windows 7 has an average quarterly infection rate of 2.5 for the 64-bit version and 3.8 for the 32-bit flavor, Vista SP2 is at 5.3 for x64 and 7.5 for x86 while XP is at 15.9 for x64 and 19.3 for x86.

“Infection rates for the 64-bit versions of Windows Vista and Windows 7 are lower than for the corresponding 32-bit versions of those operating systems. One reason may be that 64-bit versions of Windows still appeal to a more technically savvy audience than their 32-bit counterparts, despite increasing sales of 64-bit Windows versions among the general computing population,” the Redmond company said.

“Kernel Patch Protection (KPP), a feature of 64-bit versions of Windows that protects the kernel from unauthorized modification, may also contribute to the discrepancy by preventing certain types of malware from operating.”

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

2,728 hits · 7 comments · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


IE9 Removes Flash 10.3 Cookies via Delete Browsing History

Download Updated Windows PowerShell 2.0 Core Help

Get Windows 7 SP1 RTM Free from Microsoft

New Microsoft Security Essentials Antimalware Engine Release Planned for Next Week

Free Windows Azure Marketplace DataMarket Add-in for Excel CTP2 Released

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: Peter on 13 May 2011, 15:20 UTC reply to this comment

Where is Linux and Apple OX on this scale. Oh sorry, marginal infection numbers not numerically significant. Enjoy Windows. Some of us have work to do. Peter


Comment #2 by: SJ on 13 May 2011, 17:56 UTC reply to this comment

@Peter:
Who want to attack OS with such small market share? Oh BTW, Mac was hacked in seconds during PWN 2 OWN contest in last few years. Enjoy your hard work to secure your crappy OS while trolling on the net.

Comment #2.1 by: Windows20 on 14 May 2011, 07:32 GMT

@SJ, However, what you said it would be a think in the past. Macs would eventually get those attacks. For those nice pretty computers would get attacked. Windows will eventually will have lower infection rates. However, what happened to Windows 7 also happened to all versions of Windows. While Windows XP was released, there were lower infection rates in Windows 98 and Windows 2000. However, Windows 7 64-bit editions are much more secure than Windows 7 32-bit editions. Most PC sold in the market have 64-bit editions. However, I would like Windows 8 to have heavy security and incompatible with all kinds of viruses along with though protection. I would like to see more attacks on Linux since Linux people and their creators said that they are 100% immune. Google Chrome OS is half Linux so maybe the virus in Chrome OS could spread to other Linux OS and will cause a problem. So, maybe that the Chrome OS would be the starting point for viruses and hackers. haha! btw, phishing attacks can happen on any operating system. So, phishing is dangerous.

Comment #2.2 by: Goody on 14 May 2011, 10:49 GMT

So, many big and famous corporations use linux servers rather than other, so you can think and say everything, but it is not true.Linux servers are more stable and reliable than any others like MS ... So, it means, that the linux desktops are too.


Comment #3 by: Wolfram on 14 May 2011, 17:33 UTC reply to this comment

Have someone wondered why NSA is using (and developing) Linux?

http://www.nsa.gov/research/selinux/

Why their IT experts decided not to use Windows? Just because they hate "the life without walls" - provided by Microsoft's Windows 7?

And why IBM Corp. have invested a few billion dollars in Linux?

N.B.: I am not a Linux fan. I prefer AmigaOS.-

Comment #3.1 by: Boozer on 14 May 2011, 18:18 GMT

You need to read your own link

24. Does NSA favor Linux?

"As noted above, NSA does not favor or promote any specific software product or platform; NSA is only promoting enhanced security. The Flask architecture demonstrated in the SELinux reference implementation has been ported to several other operating systems, including Solaris, FreeBSD, and Darwin, has been ported to the Xen™ hypervisor, and has been applied to applications such as the X Window System, GConf, D-BUS and PostgreSQL. The concepts of the Flask architecture are broadly applicable to a wide range of systems and environments. See the Related Work page for links to related efforts."


Comment #4 by: Old Liquid on 14 Jul 2011, 20:17 UTC reply to this comment

32-bit W7 doesn't has KPP, also experienced users prefer XP for usability and performance. Even when I use W7, I seat under SuperAdmin for less pain in * . For security... Using an antivirus and firewall makes you a somewhat secure, don't ya think?

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM