Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Science > Health

January 24th, 2011, 13:54 GMT · By

UK's Chief Scientist: GM Crops Needed for Survival

SHARE:

Adjust text size:


Britain's chief scientist says that GM crops could help alleviate the world's food problems
Enlarge picture
The chief scientist of the UK government, Sir John Beddington, said recently that the third world and developing countries cannot afford blocking the cultivation of genetically-modified (GM) crops on ethical and moral grounds, given the state the world is in.

While avoiding to acknowledge the validity of the arguments against GM crops, and the practices of companies that sale them, the high-ranking British official said that the world is getting ready to face a crisis unlike any other it has ever seen.

The announcement was made following the food riots that took place in North Africa. Around the world, food prices are soaring, and the expert seems to think that growing GM crops could solve all this.

“A number of very important factors are about to change our world. Its population is rising by six million every month and will reach a total of around 9,000 million by 2050,” the scientist said.

“At the same time, it is estimated that by 2030 more than 60% of the population will be living in cities and will no longer be involved in growing crops or raising domestic animals,” he added.

“And on top of that the world’s population is getting more prosperous and able to pay for more food,” he went on to say. As such, by 2050, the global population will need 40 percent more food, 30 percent more water, and 50 percent more energy than it does today.

By around the same time, the unwillingness politicians show to get past their own interests, and vote into effect laws to counteract the effects of global warming and climate change, would have began to make its effects felt.

Rising temperatures will warm oceans, cause glaciers to melt, trigger widespread floods and droughts, and bring about many instances of diversification. All of this will be accompanied by shifts in global precipitation patterns, Our World reports.

“We could cut down tropical rain forests and plant crops on the savannas to grow more food, but that would leave us even more vulnerable to the impact of global warming and climate change. We needed these regions to help absorb carbon dioxide emissions, after all,” the UK scientist argued.

A solution to all this would be to allow the widespread use of new biotechnological techniques in farming, granted that no harm is inflicted on humans or the environment.

Beddington made the comments ahead of the release of a new report called “The Future of Food and Farming,” which is a major document that will be considered by the UK Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA), and by the Department for International Development.

“Around 30% of food is lost before it can be harvested because it is eaten by pests that we never learnt how to control. We cannot afford that kind of loss to continue,” the expert said.

“GM should be able to solve that problem by creating pest-resistant strains, for example. Of course, we will have to make sure these crops are properly tested; that they work; that they don’t harm people; and that they don’t harm the environment,” Beddington concluded.

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

662 hits · 3 comments · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


We Could Detect Forests on Exoplanets

Rains Turn Australia Green

Genetic Switch Allows Plants to Grow Very Fast

Plants Have a 'Memory' Molecule

Experts Sequence and Assemble Cocoa Tree Genome

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: john on 24 Jan 2011, 16:52 UTC reply to this comment

Just watch the UK introduce GM on a massive scale without absolutely no safety protocols in place. UK citizens may as well kiss their freedom of food choice goodbye.

Even if the UK develops its own GM crops and has companies to do it, these will be bought out by Monsanto in under two years, it's going to be food tyranny on a global scale, which is what has been happening wherever they've taken over. They're going to hike up the prices for seeds every year, like they've been doing for years.

I'd like to know which biotech company this man Beddington has worked for in the past, that revolving door policy was never any good for the people, just for the elite, who live ahead of the destructive wake their policies leave behind.


Comment #2 by: Eric on 24 Jan 2011, 20:33 UTC reply to this comment

Funny, because GM crops are a reason some people are in starvation today. While it is true that we will obviously need more food as the population grows, governments need to understand the economic impact of GM crops, as well.

For example, the US produces mass amounts of GM corn, which is government subsidized. They are able to produce so much of it at such a small cost (thanks both to government subsidies and the genetic modifications) that the price is rock-bottom, lower than what local farmers in third world nations can compete with. To stay alive, they are forced to grow "cash crops" instead of subsistence farming, resulting in hunger even amongst farmers. Globalization means that even things that look good on face value can hurt others in different parts of the world. A *true* policy on hunger needs to be comprehensive, understanding economic and political impacts in addition to practical ones; otherwise the policy will fail to actually help people.

Of course, gene modified foods are also at risk for disease or environmental issues. Genetic engineering isn't perfect; they have found that by increasing one attribute they sometimes create weaknesses in another. Lack of genetic variety could result in a much bigger food crisis if a virus were to wipe out a large percent of humanity's genetically uniform crops.

Finally, there's the issue of patents and cross-contamination. Currently, companies can own the patent to a genetically modified seed; if it gets cross-contaminated with non-GM farms, farmers can face lawsuits from the patent-holders. Further, the entire industry is a bit shady. Monsanto, who created the GM corn that is roundup-resistant, has long been accused of unethical, aggressive tactics and bullying smaller farmers.

Comment #2.1 by: Tudor Vieru on 25 Jan 2011, 14:17 GMT

I know, you're right, I don't agree with his statements either. And trust me, I know a thing or two about Monsanto, can't say that I'm very fond of this company

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM