|
|
|
|
September 20th, 2011, 11:33 GMT · By Elena Gorgan
‘Two and a Half Men’ Season Premiere: Goodbye Charlie, Hello Ashton |
|
|
|
|
SHARE:
Adjust text size: 
|
|
|
The much-expected season premiere of “Two and a Half Men” finally aired. After months of speculation on how writers will explain Charlie Sheen’s departure from the show – and Ashton Kutcher’s arrival – fans finally have an answer to that.To very little surprise, the events in the season premiere took place just as reported in the media some time ago.
*Fans who have not seen the season premiere yet are encouraged not to read any further than this – plenty of major spoilers ahead.*
As we also informed you a while back, producers and showrunner Chuck Lorre came up with the perfect solution for the Charlie Sheen situation: they killed off Charlie Harper, the character he played for 8 whole seasons before the scandal of earlier this year. The first episode from the new season begins with Jon Cryer’s Alan Harper talking about his brother at his funeral. Obviously, he has nothing but nice things to say. However, the juiciest part comes when stalker turned wife Rose explains to the congregation just what happened when Charlie died, the very next day after he confessed to her he’d been unfaithful. “I forgave him because I loved him unconditionally, so you can imagine my horror when the very next day he slipped on the metro platform and fell in front of an oncoming train,” she said. “I just want you to know that Charlie didn’t suffer. His body just exploded like a balloon full of meat,” Rose explained. The obvious indication is that Charlie’s death wasn’t as accidental as Rose makes it seem and that she pushed him, thus punishing him for his transgressions. Later on, after the funeral, Ashton’s character in introduced. He is Walden Schmidt, a heartbroken Internet millionaire and he spends most of the premiere episode sans clothes because he’s removed them after a failed suicide attempt in the ocean. He and Alan bond and, after spending a night with two ladies in Charlie’s bedroom, Walden decides he wants to buy the house. And, with that, Charlie Harper is history. While most reviewers online say the premiere certainly had its strong moments and was promising enough, many fans are not happy with the direction the show has taken since Sheen’s departure. If you too happen to be one of them, make yourself heard in the comments section below.
|
|
|
|
TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:
|
5,682 hits
· 33 comments
· Link to this article
· Print article
· Send to friend
· Subscribe to news
|
MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:
READER COMMENTS: |
| Comment #1 by: Bob on 20 Sep 2011, 11:51 UTC | reply to this comment | they should have killed the show when they killed Charley. Hey Ashton, it's not 1968, lose the long greasy hair and the scroungy, scraggly beard. |
| Comment #2 by: DP on 20 Sep 2011, 12:02 UTC | reply to this comment | I wish it well, but don't think it is going to make it. Charlie made the show. |
| Comment #3 by: Jacksavs on 20 Sep 2011, 13:09 UTC | reply to this comment | Saw it last night ....it was boring. Sheen so much smoother on his delivery.
Won't waste my time watching. |
| Comment #4 by: ima mess on 20 Sep 2011, 13:13 UTC | reply to this comment | All the originals actors were great, Ashton not so much!!! Needs hair cut and was not a good fit!! Disappointed in Ashton not in the show, it is pretty hard to replace Charlies character |
| Comment #5 by: Hope on 20 Sep 2011, 13:20 UTC | reply to this comment | I am a fan of Charlie's and I continue to pray for his sustained recovery and success. I like Ashton but he didn't seem to have the timing or chemistry with "Allen" that Charlie had. Don't know where they can go from here since most of the laughs in the premier were directed or based on Charlie's character. The "fart" scene with the son was wasted. I say bring him back! |
| Comment #6.1 by: Ashton who!!! on 23 Sep 2011, 02:52 GMT | Where you watching the same show I was????? Obivously not |
| Comment #6.2 by: Are you Serious on 23 Sep 2011, 03:12 GMT | Are you really serious???? |
| Comment #6.3 by: A.K.S. on 24 Sep 2011, 04:58 GMT | So, you like bad acting and enjoy watching actors in obvious desperation to make it work. |
| Comment #7 by: Epursi204 on 20 Sep 2011, 13:39 UTC | reply to this comment | The season premier of 'Two and a Half Men' had some mildly amusing moments, with enough hooks to make me consider tuning in next week. Without Charlie Sheen to play himself at the end, we are only able to imagine the darkly hilarious "Rose ex machina" that caused his demise. The introduction of Ashton Kutcher's character, Walden, was not as hilarious as it might have been, but the image of Walden/Ashton suddenly standing at the glass door, seen through the fog of Charlie's airborne ashes, was indeed ironic. The premise of Walden's character is that he is the polar opposite of Charlie. He is a 'Tabula Rasa,' inexperienced and uncorrupted, a tee-totalling innocent. He has loved only his high school sweetheart, and he seems numbly unaware of and surprised by his own good fortune. When Alan, true to his own character, tries to use Walden's charismatic naivete to his own advantage, it backfires. Both of the beautiful women they bring home sleep with Walden--a la Charlie. So Walden is buying Charlie's house, and it will be interesting to see how Alan and Jake will be allowed to stay there. Although Charlie Sheen's bitingly sharp wit and breath-catching comedic timing will be missed, it is a relief not having to watch his--and his character's--inevitable disintegration in weekly primetime installments. |
| Comment #8 by: spike on 20 Sep 2011, 14:00 UTC | reply to this comment | Kutcher was fine, but the show was mean spirited and in poor taste. Penis jokes get old. Who is the target audience, 15 year old boys? |
| Comment #9 by: KaCee on 20 Sep 2011, 14:04 UTC | reply to this comment | Why didn't Chuck have a stand in of the back side of Charlie in the shower and Rose enter the room and then a woman appear behind Charlie and ask "is that your wife?" And then introduce the whole train thing. And bringing in Ashton should have been the ashes dumped over the side of the railing by Alan and "Walden? (really?)" come up from the beach covered in "Charlie's ashes. |
| Comment #10 by: justmyopinion on 20 Sep 2011, 14:10 UTC | reply to this comment | I think it is going to take some time for the transition to really catch. Charlie WAS Two and a Half Men, not saying Kusher can't pull it off, but I think it will take some time. Wasn't thrilled with the premier, but enjoyed it. Good Luck to all! |
| Comment #11 by: deadend on 20 Sep 2011, 14:17 UTC | reply to this comment | I don't think the show will last. I, for one, have minimal interest after seeing the first episode. It is just not the same with the absence of Charlie. Ashton's acting is very similar to his role in That 70's show and although he is easy on the eyes, eye candy can only take you so far. |
| Comment #12 by: kr on 20 Sep 2011, 14:19 UTC | reply to this comment | Bet Chuck is sorry he fired Charly. Sucked! |
| Comment #13 by: Cat on 20 Sep 2011, 14:26 UTC | reply to this comment | No way. Ridiculous. To have him killed. Maybe remove him but have him for future appearances - he did make the show what it is . And love Ashton kutcher but could of been better storyline to introduce him. |
| Comment #14 by: unhappy on 20 Sep 2011, 15:45 UTC | reply to this comment | VERY disappointed... The show lacked intelligence. No humor in stupid. A weak crying nudist is not funny, it's not something I'd enjoy watching. Not a fan of last nights episode. There should be more of Berta and less of Charlie's replacement if this is going to be the story line. I fear you will be loosing your adult audience |
| Comment #14.1 by: pucky5 on 24 Sep 2011, 02:49 GMT | I agree. I did not think Ashton Kutchner was funny at all. He is goofy like in the 70'S show. Why did the writer pick him. I think Stamos would have been a better choice. I agree there is no chemistry in the delivering of the lines. I like the rest of the cast but Ashton does not seem to fit in. |
| Comment #15 by: LulzLizard on 20 Sep 2011, 19:31 UTC | reply to this comment | We got articles about science, medicine, technology, world news... yet a Charlie Sheen article is the one I have seen the most comments ever on Softpedia...
#AntiSec must live on |
| Comment #16 by: CHARLIE FAN on 21 Sep 2011, 00:02 UTC | reply to this comment | WE! WANT! CHARLIE! WE! WANT! CHARLIE!
..THE RE-RUNS ARE BETTER. I'D RATHER WATCH THEM. HEY ASHTON KEEP YOUR CLOTHES ON.. NOT FUNNY |
| Comment #17 by: txgirl on 21 Sep 2011, 18:23 UTC | reply to this comment | I liked it....the nudity jokes are not funny to me....however, I have loved the show and I wish it well...I will continue to watch it...but I MISS CHARLIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
| Comment #18 by: Ashton who!!! on 23 Sep 2011, 02:51 UTC | reply to this comment | I can say as a Two and a Half Men enthusiast, that I am disappointed in the direction the show is headed. I will say that Charlie Sheen really made the show. I was happy to see Jon Cryer (Alan Harper) start off the show and pose the question whether he could carry the show on his own? I think the writers would run out of material for Alan and he is really not that strong to do so. Now the question about Ashton Kutcher replacing Charlie Sheen and will the show be a success? As much as I wanted to continue loving the show and enjoy watching it, I don’t think the show measured up to my expectations. Yes, the show had its moments, but they were really contributed by Alan Harper and not so much from Ashton. I like Ashton and he did a great job in “70 Shows” but to see him in this role, he really does not stand out and this type of humor or the humor that I enjoyed in the original show is lacking. I will give the show a chance and watch next week, but if it continues to lack, I am sorry to say that I may have to give up on Two and a Half Men. It will be a sad day for me. |
| Comment #19 by: A.K.S. on 24 Sep 2011, 04:53 UTC | reply to this comment | WERE ALL THE WRITERS FIRED ALONG WITH SHEEN? Chuck Lorre proved Charlie Sheen right. This first episode was distasteful, mean spirited, immature and full of cheap tricks. Who is the target audience? certainly not Charlie's 2 1/2 men fan base. Lorre should not have insulted Sheen fans and should make a public apology.
Hey Ashton! grow up already, you're stuck in a time warp. How does it make you feel to have to resort to a referenced well hung penis to get a laugh? A big deflated flop. |
| Comment #20 by: garysund on 25 Sep 2011, 12:59 UTC | reply to this comment | The original fans may not be happy campers, but the show still has the original strong supporting cast and if some of the Sheen fans quite watching that won't be a problem because Ashton has his own fan base to replace them. I think long term fans need to give the show a few more episodes before they make their judgement. |
| Comment #21 by: CarolAnn on 27 Sep 2011, 00:59 UTC | reply to this comment | I missed when Charlie Sheen died,and are they going to show that episode again,loved the show with Charlie Sheen ,I know he kind of went crazy for awhile,but to me ,the show will never be same without Charlie Sheen,very sad he had left,Ashton,is ok but nothing compared to Charlie,I think of Ashton,as still young guy from 70's show? Still love you Charlie |
| Comment #22 by: g man on 28 Sep 2011, 02:36 UTC | reply to this comment | It sucked. Not sure I will continue to watch it, but will continue to watch the old episodes. So sad.... |
| Comment #23 by: 'ol Ky. granny on 28 Sep 2011, 15:01 UTC | reply to this comment | Said it before,and I'll say it again,Two Men and a Halfwit.Jake had one or two line's,farted, and for that he's paid fourty or fifty 'g's'? * if he said more than ten word's it would bankrupt the show...nope,just not funny, oh and Berta get over banging Ashton,you got 'bout as much chance as I do,living here in Kentucky..by ya'll..Please pray for our troop's, and God Bless the USA...'ol Kentucky Granny |
| Comment #24 by: ROSIE on 28 Sep 2011, 17:24 UTC | reply to this comment | I HATE THE NEW SHOW I WATCH ALL THE OLD RERUNS. NOBODY COULD REPLACE CHARLIE |
| Comment #25 by: Cat on 02 Oct 2011, 20:53 UTC | reply to this comment | I really liked this show (Charlie Sheen, Jon Cryer and cast) and thought they (writer/cast) could really pull it off with Ashton Kutcher being added. But sadly, was disappointed. I really like all of the actors and writers of the show, but the writing/chemistry of the show is off. |
| Comment #26 by: sandra on 06 Oct 2011, 15:42 UTC | reply to this comment | I did not like the way it ended and it is not the same anymore without Charlie Sheen I don't watch any more. |
| Comment #27 by: Belen on 09 Nov 2011, 22:01 UTC | reply to this comment | :'( charlie harper I love youuuuu
no te vayas sin ti no sera lo mismo |
| Comment #28 by: Belen on 09 Nov 2011, 22:04 UTC | reply to this comment | CHARLIE NO TENIA QUE MORIR DONDE ESTA LA ALEGRIA DE ESTE PROGRAMA SIN CHARLIE NO SERA IGUAL
:( EXTRAÑARE AL VERDADERO CHARLE HARPER |
| Comment #29 by: Kate on 15 Nov 2011, 16:02 UTC | reply to this comment | I would have liked to see them simply re-cast Charlie Harper, rather than killing him off. But the show is still good. I will keep watching simply because I don't want Charlie Sheen's predictions that the show couldn't make it without him to be true. I hope he gets the help he needs for his problem. | |
Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at 
|
|