Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Science > Sci Pry

September 12th, 2008, 09:09 GMT · By

Top Physicists Ponder on the Idea of Universe in an Atom

SHARE:

Adjust text size:


Dr. Jonathan Friedrich from Cal Tech postulating oddities
Enlarge picture
Theoretical thinking certainly received a forward push in Monday's historic conference at Stanford University. World's brightest physicists gathered there to expose and discuss their revolutionary theories. Among the weirdest ideas stated was the one that suggests our universe is just a tiny atom in something way vaster. 

MIT's Dr. Jacob Bozeman admitted that "The implications of this deceptively simple hypothesis are completely blowing my mind. Like, we could all be nothing more than this little dot in the fingernail of some giant dude. Or maybe a seed in the mustard of some really big sandwich, or even a germ on the back of a flea that's sitting on a hair on some giant dog."

Although certainly not new, the idea was brought to this particular conference by some particle physicists at Cal Tech. They came to think of this as they were sitting on a couch by the cyclotron of their Physics Department, comparing ceiling tile patterns while waiting for the pizza guy to come. This is just one of the ideas that scared the scientists, and there are many more, such as the concept of parallel (or "alternate") Earths or the multi-dimensional "superstrings" theory, which claims that superstrings fold forward and backward throughout the fabric of the universe.

Besides "forward and backward," the highest-level guest Stephen Hawkings advanced the possibility of "lateral" or "sideways" referring to time. In his own words, "If time goes sideways as well as forward, there might be other versions of this reality where, say, the Roman Empire is still in charge and stuff. By the way, ever think about what'd happen if you, say, went back in time and accidentally killed your own younger self?"

As a reaction to that, Dr. Wei Lo-Huang from Princeton exclaims: "I remember I was pretty wigged out when Feynman came up with that [theory] about antiparticles just being normal particles traveling backwards in time. [...] But now Hawking comes up with this? What is with that?" The physics specialist worries about the validity of his calculations and equations: "If this turns out to be true, it will require a total recalibration of all our methods for measuring space-time flux." Experts prefer to avoid thinking too much on the implications of such theories for now and just take them one at a time.

Some even believe these ideas went too far, like Dr. Sanjay Gupta, famous for his studies related to the theory of advanced quantum hydroponics. "It's like, one big atom? Forget about it, man. Even weirder is, like, if we're just one big atom in a larger universe, how do we know all the little atoms don't have, you know, little universes in them, with little people living on them, with little cars and little houses, and maybe even itsy-bitsy tiny[...] international symposiums on cutting-edge theoretical physics, even."

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

4,547 hits · 14 comments · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


Faster than Light?

How Does Quantum Suicide Work?

How Would Antimatter Interact with Gravity?

10 Strangest Things in Space

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: darwyn4 on 12 Sep 2008, 12:12 UTC reply to this comment

i thought about this way before i read it here.. it's an idea that's been haunting me :D

Comment #1.1 by: dubp on 23 May 2011, 13:58 GMT

oh yeah yoy tought of it WAY befor u heard it here....i bet u like bands way befor they become mainstream..n all that jazz ye....i know ur game


Comment #2 by: Eric on 12 Sep 2008, 20:07 UTC reply to this comment

This just proves that the top scientists in the world actually do sometimes smoke weed :D


Comment #3 by: DS on 06 Feb 2009, 08:42 UTC reply to this comment

I thought up the idea that the universe is an atom about 30 years ago when I was ten :D


Comment #4 by: Mike on 04 Jun 2009, 09:12 UTC reply to this comment

I think the problem with the theory is people are comparing what we know of atoms to the universe. I truly believe in fact our universe is an atom for the like of a better word. However, looking from our point of view out we are not likely to recognize anything close to what we see when we peer into the atom. I just believe its similar maybe not exactly like an atom. I think we are very very small in reality; there is no other way to explain the vastness of the universe. My thing is this though; we are very special and extremely lucky to have developed into such inquisitive beings. When you think about it, we are miracles of science/physics!!!!

Comment #4.1 by: Ron freeman on 29 Nov 2009, 05:43 GMT

Miracles of science? Sorry but the last time I checked Science dose not recognize miracles.
The definition for miracle- An event that appears inexplicable by the laws of nature and so is held to be supernatural in origin or an act of God


Comment #5 by: JYH on 15 Jul 2009, 08:23 UTC reply to this comment

this has been going around a long time, even children brought this theory up before, no need for physicists to think of this instinctive question.


Comment #6 by: tomtopo on 22 Aug 2010, 20:47 UTC reply to this comment

T’s- Theory

The energy expelled from a black hole creates a shell of energy that is supported by black energy (the opposite of gravity). Each black hole establishes their own shell and black energy supports the shell from closing back onto itself. Larger black holes will swallow smaller ones until there is only one gigantic black hole. When the universe cools to a critical temperature and dark matter can no longer support the largest shell of expelled energy it will break and fall back onto itself. When this largest shell breaks it will represent the point of sigularity as the velocity of implosion will warp time and all matter. The reconstitution of all energy and matter by this gigantic collapse. The meeting of gravity and anit-gravity will create the spark for another big bang and we start all over again.

Comment #6.1 by: rogermunns on 27 Sep 2010, 20:34 GMT

Just a thought that we could imagine the very largest universe in an infinite number of universe shells is in fact the very smallest.


Comment #7 by: Marco Jones on 17 May 2011, 02:46 UTC reply to this comment

I believe that our entire universe is simply the genetic make up of something else.


Comment #8 by: Tuddles on 04 Aug 2011, 01:03 UTC reply to this comment

I couldn't sleep, cause my mind wondered back to this idea as it has so many times before.
And i have a gut feeling that we will find some kind of truth to that tall tale.
All we need to find is a universe in an atom, who knows maybe we will find that electrons are build up of something which resembles the universe.
But I do not know, since im no great juggler of the maths or have any deeper understanding of the universe and the physics which makes it happen.

But if anyone ever finds the theory to be true, I'll say it in advance:
"Darn it, I told you so. You can keep going smaller and smaller, and time moves slower and slower, while bigger and bigger makes the * never hit the fan!"

Comment #8.1 by: fats on 23 Aug 2011, 23:02 GMT

as you go bigger and bigger would'nt time seem slower to us? so i wonder what we would see if we took and history of the univers and looked at it in fast ford. maybe it would look more like the atomic level.


Comment #9 by: fats on 23 Aug 2011, 22:52 UTC reply to this comment

as you go bigger and bigger time would go slower to us would'nt it? so what would happen if we looked at the univers in fast ford? maybe it would look like what we see happening at the atomic level.


Comment #10 by: emmylou on 17 Apr 2012, 04:18 UTC reply to this comment

i had this same realization about a week ago when painting a picture of the universe. its is just a tiny atoms with a nuclei and too much energy to hide from us.

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM