NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home / News / Science / Sci Pry

Sci Pry


Top Physicists Ponder on the Idea of Universe in an Atom

The scientists' gathering at Palo Alto spawned strange ideas

By Dan Talpalariu, Science Editor

12th of September 2008, 09:09 GMT

Adjust text size:


Dr. Jonathan Friedrich from Cal Tech postulating oddities
Enlarge picture
Theoretical thinking certainly received a forward push in Monday's historic conference at Stanford University. World's brightest physicists gathered there to expose and discuss their revolutionary theories. Among the weirdest ideas stated was the one that suggests our universe is just a tiny atom in something way vaster. 

MIT's Dr. Jacob Bozeman admitted that "The implications of this deceptively simple hypothesis are completely blowing my mind. Like, we could all be nothing more than this little dot in the fingernail of some giant dude. Or maybe a seed in the mustard of some really big sandwich, or even a germ on the back of a flea that's sitting on a hair on some giant dog."

Although certainly not new, the idea was brought to this particular conference by some particle physicists at Cal Tech. They came to think of this as they were sitting on a couch by the cyclotron of their Physics Department, comparing ceiling tile patterns while waiting for the pizza guy to come. This is just one of the ideas that scared the scientists, and there are many more, such as the concept of parallel (or "alternate") Earths or the multi-dimensional "superstrings" theory, which claims that superstrings fold forward and backward throughout the fabric of the universe.

Besides "forward and backward," the highest-level guest Stephen Hawkings advanced the possibility of "lateral" or "sideways" referring to time. In his own words, "If time goes sideways as well as forward, there might be other versions of this reality where, say, the Roman Empire is still in charge and stuff. By the way, ever think about what'd happen if you, say, went back in time and accidentally killed your own younger self?"

As a reaction to that, Dr. Wei Lo-Huang from Princeton exclaims: "I remember I was pretty wigged out when Feynman came up with that [theory] about antiparticles just being normal particles traveling backwards in time. [...] But now Hawking comes up with this? What is with that?" The physics specialist worries about the validity of his calculations and equations: "If this turns out to be true, it will require a total recalibration of all our methods for measuring space-time flux." Experts prefer to avoid thinking too much on the implications of such theories for now and just take them one at a time.

Some even believe these ideas went too far, like Dr. Sanjay Gupta, famous for his studies related to the theory of advanced quantum hydroponics. "It's like, one big atom? Forget about it, man. Even weirder is, like, if we're just one big atom in a larger universe, how do we know all the little atoms don't have, you know, little universes in them, with little people living on them, with little cars and little houses, and maybe even itsy-bitsy tiny[...] international symposiums on cutting-edge theoretical physics, even."

TAGS:

universe | atom | physics | Stephen Hawkings | superstrings
Read by 1,434 user(s) | Add comment | Link to this article TWEET THIS


Article rating:
Fair (2.7/5) 4 vote(s)    

Subscribe to news | Print article | Send to friend

© Copyright 2001-2009 Softpedia
Contact:

 

 

SEARCH THE NEWS ARCHIVE :




Today's News
| Yesterday's News | News Archive


MORE RELATED ARTICLES:


Faster than Light?

How Does Quantum Suicide Work?

How Would Antimatter Interact with Gravity?

10 Strangest Things in Space

User opinions:


Comment #1 by: darwyn4 on 12 Sep 2008, 12:12 GMT reply to this comment

i thought about this way before i read it here.. it's an idea that's been haunting me :D


Comment #2 by: Eric on 12 Sep 2008, 20:07 GMT reply to this comment

This just proves that the top scientists in the world actually do sometimes smoke weed :D


Comment #3 by: DS on 06 Feb 2009, 08:42 GMT reply to this comment

I thought up the idea that the universe is an atom about 30 years ago when I was ten :D


Comment #4 by: Mike on 04 Jun 2009, 09:12 GMT reply to this comment

I think the problem with the theory is people are comparing what we know of atoms to the universe. I truly believe in fact our universe is an atom for the like of a better word. However, looking from our point of view out we are not likely to recognize anything close to what we see when we peer into the atom. I just believe its similar maybe not exactly like an atom. I think we are very very small in reality; there is no other way to explain the vastness of the universe. My thing is this though; we are very special and extremely lucky to have developed into such inquisitive beings. When you think about it, we are miracles of science/physics!!!!


Comment #5 by: JYH on 15 Jul 2009, 08:23 GMT reply to this comment

this has been going around a long time, even children brought this theory up before, no need for physicists to think of this instinctive question.

Share your opinion:

Your Name:
Your Email Address:
(will not be used for commercial purposes)
Solve this to prove you're not a bot: =
Your review/opinion:

 




Windows tabGames tabDrivers tabMac tabLinux tabScripts tabMobile tabHandheld tabGadgets tabNews tab

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   ENTER NEWS SITE   |   ENGLISH BOARD   |   ROMANIAN FORUM