Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
TRENDING TODAY
Home > News > Microsoft > Windows

September 18th, 2009, 15:21 GMT · By

The Windows 7 11-Second Boot and the Computer That Made It Possible

SHARE:

Adjust text size:

Windows 7 RTM
Enlarge picture
Windows 7’s evolution compared to Windows Vista is undeniable, and the lucky few that so far have had access to the RTM bits of the latest Windows client can confirm this. But fact of the matter is that even in Beta Build 7000 development stage, Windows 7 bested Vista, and the boot time performance drag race is an illustrative example in this regard. However, Windows 7 startup speeds manage to leave its precursor in the dust. Some of you might remember reading about the 11-second boot Windows 7 delivered in a demonstration courtesy of Ruston Panabaker, Microsoft's principal program manager of strategic silicon partnering. (via PCMag and Beyond Binary)

Yes, Windows 7 booting in just 11 seconds. My first question was, what kind of computer was Panabaker running, for obvious, and geeky, reasons. So I went ahead, and shot an email to Microsoft asking for details about the hardware configuration of the 11-second Windows 7 boot machine. Here is the answer a company spokesperson provided me: “This was ran on a Quad-core 1.7 GHz Nehalem [Core i7] processor on a Calpella chipset, 2GB of memory, 80 GB Intel X25-M SSD (1st gen). In the set up, the log-in screen was turned off in the user control panel.

However, the Microsoft representative noted that the 11-second boot represented just the startup time for Windows 7. “Note: BIOS post is in addition to this,” the company spokesperson added. My second question was what kind of optimizations went into making this kind of performance possible. The way I figured it, if I have the hardware configuration, and know about the tweaks, maybe I can do it myself. But guess what?

Yes, it’s all Windows 7, and nothing but Windows 7. “Nothing else special was done to create the 11 second boot time for Windows to the desktop,” the Microsoft spokesperson shared with me. As some of you might recall, Microsoft revealed early on in the development process of its latest Windows client the fact that it had revamped the way that the platform dealt with services. In Vista and previous releases of Windows, every service that is scheduled to start during operating system startup adds precious time to the overall experience.

In Windows 7 this is no longer the case. Vista’s successor features a mechanism that only starts services on demand. Essentially, Windows 7 contains the Trigger Start Services feature and delivers the evolution of the service control manager (SCM), reducing the number of services using Automatic Start, and taking a load off RAM and I/O.

My next question was related to the work end users need to do to achieve similar, and I stress similar, performance with their own computers. “Users should train Windows on what to pre-fetch during boot. This can be done by rebooting their PC several times,” the Microsoft spokesperson said.

Windows 7 RTM Enterprise 90-Day Evaluation is available for download here.


20,211 hits · 4 comments
Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


Office 2010 Office Web Apps Technical Preview Is Live

Windows 7, Just $29.99 – Buy and Download - Students Only

Buy Windows 7 RTM for Just £30 Come October 1, 2009

Microsoft: Windows Live Hotmail Wave 4 Rolling Out

Windows 7 Bests Snow Leopard Says Mac Hacker

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: Michael Palmer on 18 Sep 2009, 16:46 UTC reply to this comment

Without out a doubt it is faster
My Brother goes to a tech school so I have access to all of the windows editions for free.
I had Vista and my computer would take anywhere from 1-2.5 minutes to turn on.
I have a Inspiron 1501 with a AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-58 with 2.5 Gigs of Ram and a 80GB hard drive.
Then I acquired Windows 7 RTM Build 7100.
Turning on took around 30 seconds to turn on or resume from hibernating.
I also could run a bunch of 20 year old games that wouldn't run with Vista.
All in all everthing seems to run 10 times faster with W-7.
As long as the official release runs just as fast as the pre-release does I'm happy.


Comment #2 by: The Mokoda on 18 Sep 2009, 23:48 UTC reply to this comment

Sorry, but that has not been my experience. I have a lot, and I mean LOT (as in over 100) programs installed under Win7, just as I did with XP. No, they aren't all starting up automatically when Windows starts, but they are there. I have found that as I install more and more programs, Win7 startup times get longer, to the point at which it may boot maybe 20-30 seconds faster than XP. And I'm starting timing at the point at which "Starting Windows' appears on screen.
Now, once loaded, Win7 does pretty much run circles around XP, but I have found no dramatic improvement in boot times, and this by the way, is on the same hardware (dual booting XP and Win7).
What I will do is take a look at services and see what's happening there; maybe I'll get better results with a little tuning. But having been using Win7 since January, I can say from my experience (which may or may not be typical) that Windows boot time hasn't really been improved all that much.


Comment #3 by: nloewen on 19 Sep 2009, 15:11 UTC reply to this comment

so? Ubuntu 9.04 boots in 7.83 seconds on hardware that is guaranteed slower than that. And in a year the goal is to boot in 10 seconds ON A NETBOOK.


Comment #4 by: Tonester on 20 Sep 2009, 21:11 UTC reply to this comment

I can confirm a similar boot time on my recently upgraded PC:
About 15 seconds for the BIOS to finish (the DMI update stage), then a further 11 seconds for Windows 7 to load (desktop showing and usable).

The key thing is using an SSD for the O/S drive. My rig is cheaper than the one mentioned in the article, but just as effective: Phenom II X2 processor, 4GB of DDR3 and an OCX Vertex 60GB SSD for the O/S - Windows 7 Ultimate RTM. (All user Documents and most Program Files are installed on other drives)

Who knows, it might be even quicker with "No GUI Boot" and turning off the Windows "start-up" sound...

Copyright © 2001-2013 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM