Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Science > Behavior/Humans

December 28th, 2008, 10:39 GMT · By

The UK Moves for More Internet Control

SHARE:

Adjust text size:


Most parents have no idea about what their children are doing while on-line
Enlarge picture
The UK Culture Secretary, Andy Burnham, announced recently that the country would move towards a greater degree of control in on-line browsing, especially for children. According to the newly-proposed rules, web pages will have to be rated according to a nationally-devised system that will warn visitors as to the content of the site and the danger it poses to underage children. The Secretary proposed a rating system similar to those employed by various sites in determining the quality of a video or picture.

”The Internet is becoming a more and more pervasive entity in all our lives and yet the content standards on-line are not as clear as we've all been used in traditional media. I think we do need to have a debate now about clearer signposting and labeling on-line because it can be quite a confusing world, particularly for parents who are trying to ensure their children are only accessing appropriate stuff,” the official told the BBC.

“It's not about banning or stopping people having that freedom of expression. It's simply about clearer signposting, more information, so people know where they're working,” he added. At the same time, Burnham said that he was not advocating a curb in Internet freedom, but merely a more careful control of the content that small children can unwillingly come across while surfing the Web. He quoted official statistics, which said that 3 in 4 British children were disturbed by images or videos they found while browsing the Internet.

“It's one thing to have a political commitment, but it's much harder to actually enforce it. We want these ideas to have teeth. And these mechanisms on their own aren't enough. They've got to be combined with greater parental awareness. Most parents have no clue what their children are up to on-line. What I think is missing from these proposals is that it's not just about what sites children might see, it's about who they might meet on-line,” said Diana Sutton, the head of policy and public affairs at the National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (NSPCC).

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

1,060 hits · 1 comment · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


Sweden Cracks Down on Illegal Internet File Sharers

The 'Great Aussie Wall' Spawns Harsh Criticism

Internet Would Have Stopped Hitler, Claims Nobel Winner

China Says It Will Continue Banning Internet Content

Russian Entrepreneur Wants to Trademark the 'Wink'

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: Livelonger87 on 28 Dec 2008, 11:35 UTC reply to this comment

This seems great - something we can all agree on. This applies to both perspectives, eliminating the constraints between; for those who wish for conscious freedom throughout the web and for those who wish for a lack of traumatizing content - or for those wanting for less 'inappropriate' sexually explicit or abusive content, whether it be written or displayed in the form of images. This will bridge a gap between, enabling for curious users - or for those who desire to view such content, and for those who wish to avoid.

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM