The New Wallpapers of Ubuntu 10.04 LTS

Very pretty!

What's with all the damn flowers in 10.04.

Really......................
Awesome...............

MAC and windows really sucks............

I tried 10.04 beta 2. It definitely shows promise and I'm looking forward to the completed version. However I had problems with Opera crashing and freezing up. Also didn't like the default black menu bar with white lettering or the black menus in Firefox and Chrome. That's why I was using Opera because, for some reason, its drop down menus were white with black lettering. Easier for me to see.

Yes, I know I could have changed the theme but I was just too annoyed to do it. Why would they change the browser menus anyway?

Also really hated having the close and minimise buttons on the left side rather than the right. Why Canonical changed that I'll never understand. Fortunately it's not hard to move the buttons back over to the right side where (IMHO) they should be. It's interesting to note that Chromes buttons were on the right by default. Weird ...

:-) i love that they place flower wallpapers

:-)) they moved buttons on left becouse they will place new buttons on right side... i think that they will place menu (File, Edit, View,...) on right so we will have more space..., and the black menus can't be change becouse every menu use theme... and i like more white menus... but i think that every browser should make a different UI for ubuntu ... they use Windows UI for Ubuntu and Linux...

this looks good. now first we should understand something, Ubuntu is a community driven "FREE" OS. its not like any corporate powered proprietary software. if a "FREE" software can deliver stability than any paid ones, than that is more important. in Ubuntu i got the freedom to change it in a way i want it to look and act. thats the freedom i enjoy and i love ubuntu for that freedom.

Abiance and Radiance are quite professional looking in my book.
Looks far better than anything on Windows.
Still in beta too.

Does this author even read the same things she writes?

Not professional, BUT

..."Ubuntu 10.04 (Lucid Lynx) will be definitely a stable, secure, reliable and good-looking operating system! "...

let's see, what's your measure of professional, then?

Catchy phrasing, but the article does not support the claim made, nor even attempt to make a case for the claim. Please either write about what you are talking about, or use some sort of title that at least addresses your assertions.

@aby: Except it is corporate powered. Canonical is backing it and is handling a good portion of the development themselves. Just because its "free" doesn't mean anything. Canonical is a service-based company. Thus they sell things like tech support to companies using their product.

these are beautiful and i love the default one :-)
thy for releasing ......

I think all of the wallpapers are superb; however, like Clif I have a serious problem with the author's comment, "While Canonical failed once again to deliver that "professional-looking theme".

When are these self proclaimed 'Technology Critics' going to stop thinking their person opinions are facts or even objective descriptive statements. I installed Lucid 10.04 on a laptop earlier this week and its GUI and general appearance looks as "professional" as any of the machines currently sitting on the shelf at Staples or Wal-mart.

If the author can not offer constructive criticism or a simple curosry summary of the OS then kindly be quiet.