NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home / News / Science / Behavior/Humans

Behavior/Humans


The Media Influences Popular Perception on Diseases

Frequent reports could make an outbreak seem more serious than it is

By Tudor Vieru, Science Editor

30th of October 2008, 15:56 GMT

Adjust text size:


Media coverage might give ample proportions to harmless outbreaks
Enlarge picture
A recent study proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that people truly follow whatever the media tells them to the last word. To show that this is especially true in the case of disease outbreaks, a team of scientists from the McMaster University conducted a survey on the reactions the name of ten diseases triggered in test subjects.
 

Their results showed that the diseases that get most media coverage, such as the avian flu, anthrax or SARS, were rated by participants in the study as being more dangerous than other, less-broadcast but potentially deadlier conditions, such as Lassa fever and yellow fever. The test subjects were first only given the names of the pathogens and asked to order them according to the threat they posed.
 

As expected, anthrax, SARS and the avian flu were noted as the most dangerous, because they were the most widely covered in the media over the years. Participants changed their minds however, when they were only given the description of the diseases, without their names. The pathogen agents were arranged mostly in their natural order, which makes a certain amount of sense.
 

When presented with both the name and the description of the symptoms each disease caused, test subjects showed that media influence only counts when people don't know what the story is all about. "Another interesting aspect of the study is when we presented factual information about the diseases along with the names of them, the media effect wasn't nearly as strong. This suggests that people can overcome the influence of the media when you give them the facts, and so objective reporting is really critical," explained study author Karin Humphreys, an assistant professor in the Department of Psychology, Neuroscience and Behavior.
 

As for the influence of the media on the masses in general, the authors said that "We see that a single incident reported in the media, can cause great public concern if it is interpreted to mean that the potential risk is difficult to control, as with the possibility of a pandemic like in the case of Avian flu, and bioterrorism, as in the case of anthrax infection." The research was published on-line in the Public Library of Science: ONE journal.

TAGS:

mass media | anthrax | SARS | scientific study
Read by 870 user(s) | Add comment | Link to this article TWEET THIS


Article rating:
NOT RATED 0 vote(s)    

Subscribe to news | Print article | Send to friend

© Copyright 2001-2009 Softpedia
Contact:

 

 

SEARCH THE NEWS ARCHIVE :




Today's News
| Yesterday's News | News Archive


MORE RELATED ARTICLES:


The Curse of Evolution

Dark Energy for Dummies

Mice Carry African Hemorrhagic Virus

HIV Is a Century Old

Understanding Immunosuppressive Viruses

Malaria Drugs Will Become More Effective

2008 Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine Linked to Viruses

User opinions:

No user comments yet.
Be the first to express your opinion using the form below!

Share your opinion:

Your Name:
Your Email Address:
(will not be used for commercial purposes)
Solve this to prove you're not a bot: =
Your review/opinion:

 




Windows tabGames tabDrivers tabMac tabLinux tabScripts tabMobile tabHandheld tabGadgets tabNews tab

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   ENTER NEWS SITE   |   ENGLISH BOARD   |   ROMANIAN FORUM