Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Security

November 25th, 2010, 12:44 GMT · By

Teen Pleads Guilty over Anonymous DDoS Attacks in Australia

SHARE:

Adjust text size:


Aussie teen pleads guilty for Operation Titstorm attacks
Enlarge picture
A 19-year-old teenager admitted to organizing distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks against Australian government websites as part of a larger Anonymous campaign.

Steve Slayo, from Roxburgh Park, appeared before a judge in Melbourne Magistrates' Court yesterday and pleaded guilty to four charges, including unauthorised access to restricted data and inciting others to impair electronic communications.

According to the prosecution, on February 10, acting under the online pseudonym of "Rand," Slayo instructed others to attack the wbesites of communications minister Stephen Conroy and then prime minister Kevin Rudd.

He was also an operator (high privileges) on an IRC channel used to organize the DDoS attacks against various federal websites.

The purpose of these attacks was to attract media attention and "embarrass the government over its stated policy of imposing internet filters."

The teenager's actions resulted in disruptions on several websites, including Mr. Conroy's and the Parliament's, which suffered a downtime of over five hours.

According to the Sydney Morning Herald, Slayo's defense lawyer, Melainie Vinton argued that the teenager only forwarded directives from the American co-ordinators of the attacks, including an individual known as "Pulsar."

She also told the magistrate that the teenager had legitimate concerns regarding Internet censorship and that he even wrote a letter to Mr. Conroy protesting to the government's Internet filtering plan, but never sent it.

The attacks Slayo helped instrument were part of an campaign called Operation Titstorm launched by Anonymous, a group of hacktivists claiming to fight for freedom of information and other digital rights.

Slayo is scheduled to be sentenced next month, but he won't be the first to be punished for participating in Anonymous-orchestrated attacks.

Dmitriy Guzner, 19, from Verona, New Jersey, and Brian Thomas Mettenbrink, 20, of Grand Island, Nebraska, previously received one-year prison sentences for taking part in Anonymous DDoS attacks against the Chruch of Scientology websites.

For the past two months, the notorious group has been involved in a new campaign targeting the entertainment industry and anti-piracy groups, which is dubbed Operation Payback.

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

1,049 hits · 3 comments · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


Second Scientology DDoSer Jailed

Second Scientology DDoSer to Plead Guilty

Scientology Attacker Gets Prison Time

Church of Scientology DDoSer Pleads Guilty

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: X-X on 27 Nov 2010, 07:52 UTC reply to this comment

What is interesting is the fact that these guys can be found and prosecuted when the Government is motivated to do it. Their idea that they are "anonymous" is false. Also they were motivated to attack the government with the denial of service to defend child pornography? We are a bit tired of fascist style attacks from these low life, good to see them bite the dust.

Comment #1.1 by: cheesus on 13 Dec 2010, 04:21 GMT

@x-x How sad and confused you are. It might help taking the time to be informed before commenting. Australia's proposed net filter doesn't alter peoples access to child-porn. It is just there to block access to regular internet pages that host content the government doesn't approve of. Ie, abortion, euthanasia, independent journalism etc.

Also, Anonymous are not using the term anonymous in it's traditionally defined sense.

Comment #1.2 by: Joel on 23 Dec 2010, 01:51 GMT

So people not wanting the government to have secret lists blocking sites like wikileaks or ones discussion abortion or euthenasia are the fascists according to you???

Interesting definition of fascism you have there?

Yes books videos etc are sometimes censored but they tell us what is being censored and why and we can discuss it, under the blacklist we are not even allowed to discuss what is on the list?!?! thats fascist....

Child pornography is wrong, but the blacklist won't have any effect on that and is not what the black list is about. Suggesting it will is just the governments way of getting support from the ignorant masses...

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM