Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Life and Style > Beauty

December 22nd, 2011, 20:51 GMT · By

Taylor Swift CoverGirl Ad Pulled for Being Too Photoshopped

SHARE:

Adjust text size:


Taylor Swift is the latest celebrity to endorse CoverGirl products
Enlarge picture
Taylor Swift is, as her fans must already know, the latest face of CoverGirl. You might think she's ideal for the job but the people at Procter & Gamble would disagree: one ad for CoverGirl has just been discontinued for being too Photoshopped.

Various media watchdogs in the UK are constantly fighting for more honesty in beauty ads and magazines, and the latest hoopla around the Taylor Swift and CoverGirl is to be explained by this initiative.

Billboard reports that one in particular draw the eye of the National Advertising Division (NAD), for the NatureLuxe Mousse Mascara.

It shows Taylor striking a very seductive pose: she has perfect skin and, as expected, she has very long and thick eyelashes.

The print on the ad boasts that the CoverGirl mascara can guarantee “2X more volume,” but a small print at the bottom of it says that, “Lashes enhanced in post production.”

The NAD asked Procter & Gamble, CoverGirl's parent company, to provide irrefutable proof that their mascara could, indeed, boost the volume of eyelashes to the extent they claimed it would.

Instead of doing just that, the company pulled the ad altogether, issuing a statement to say that they may have been wrong when putting out the misleading Taylor Swift picture.

“Upon receiving the inquiry from the NAD, P&G discontinued the advertisement in question. The NAD has deemed our intervention as accurate and proper. We have always been committed, and we continue to be committed, to featuring visuals and claims that accurately represent our products' benefits,” the company says, as per Billboard.

The NAD sees the move as a cowardly one on part of Procter & Gamble: they should have just apologized.

“You can't use a photograph to demonstrate how a cosmetic will look after it is applied to a woman's face and then – in the mice type – have a disclosure that says 'okay, not really',” NAD director Andrea Levine says in a separate statement.

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

8,464 hits · 8 comments · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


How Acne-Scarred Girl Is a Gorgeous Model – Video

Khloe Kardashian Steps Out Without Makeup

Kate Winslet Does Her Own Makeup, Shares Beauty Tips

Boys Called Me Hairy Monster in School, Says Madonna

Courtney Stodden Steps Out Without Makeup

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: Refriedbean on 24 Dec 2011, 16:56 UTC reply to this comment

Why would you photo-shop a perfect face?

Comment #1.1 by: Kiki on 26 Dec 2011, 22:01 GMT

...because she has little tiny angel-baby blond eyelashes. ;)

Comment #1.2 by: KC on 28 Dec 2011, 07:22 GMT

She looks all squinty eyed and has bad hair. A bit on the skinny side. Also, can they please Photo Shop her voice? She sounds like a cat being strangled when she sings live.
She truly is the Brittany Spears of country music. All hype, no substance....


Comment #2 by: Rae on 24 Dec 2011, 19:09 UTC reply to this comment

Advertising is always false. Does Ellen look like her ads? No. Does Drew Barrymore? No.


Comment #3 by: oldlady99 on 24 Dec 2011, 19:54 UTC reply to this comment

I think they owe Taylor Swift an apology.. I agree she is already beautiful


Comment #4 by: David G on 24 Dec 2011, 20:26 UTC reply to this comment

Why can't they be misleading? Aren't pharmaceutical companies constantly misleading in their ads?


Comment #5 by: duhhgirl on 25 Dec 2011, 05:18 UTC reply to this comment

They always say that in every cosmetic ad "may been enhanced" why are they talking about it now?


Comment #6 by: Ricki on 27 Dec 2011, 07:10 UTC reply to this comment

Misleading? We all know that truth in advertising is simply not a common occurence anymore. What is next? If you use the lipstick and don't end up with Angelina Jolie lips you keep her from promoting a product? Get real. Miss Swift is a beautiful young lady, and one that they should be proud to have promote their cosmetics.

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM