NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home / News / Microsoft

Microsoft


Symantec: Windows Vista's Security Strategy Is Wrong

Attackers have adapted and moved on

By Marius Oiaga, Technology News Editor

28th of February 2007, 15:19 GMT

Adjust text size:


Symantec gave Microsoft a finger and then took back both hands and a foot. Let me explain. Symantec has once again attacked Microsoft's security strategy with Windows Vista, downplaying the
role that the Redmond Company will play in protecting Windows users. Symantec has acknowledged the fact that Vista is the most secure Windows operating system available on the market. However "while Microsoft has invested heavily in protecting the core operating system, attackers have already moved on," Symantec said.

The aggressive position adopted by the Cupertino-based security company is understandable as it has to fight off customer perception that Windows Vista is equivalent to a security solution and also the killer prices of Windows Live OneCare in comparison with its Norton 360.

"Symantec predicts that the new security features in Windows Vista will result in fewer instances of widespread worms that target core Windows operating system vulnerabilities. This class of worm was largely responsible for the majority of high-profile outbreaks in the early part of this century. We expect that worms will continue to thrive; however, their method of propagation will change. This trend has already been observed since the release of Windows XP SP2 and is expected to continue. Symantec does not believe that Windows Vista security improvements will stifle other classes of malicious code that have historically targeted the Windows operating system," the Cupertino-based security company forecasted.

Symantec continues to regard the end user as the weakest link in the security chain and the main vector of attacks for increasingly elaborated social engineering exploits.
Read by 1,447 user(s) | Add comment | Link to this article TWEET THIS


Article rating:
Fair (2.8/5) 6 vote(s)    

Subscribe to news | Print article | Send to friend

© Copyright 2001-2009 Softpedia
Contact:

 

 

SEARCH THE NEWS ARCHIVE :




Today's News
| Yesterday's News | News Archive


MORE RELATED ARTICLES:


Windows Vista Causes Confusion Between "Secure" and "Security"

Windows Vista Security - a Journey Not a Destination

Why Won't Microsoft Declare Windows XP Expired?

Microsoft Patches Critical Vulnerability In Windows Vista

Symantec Security for the Impenetrable Vista

Windows Vista Secure Development Lifecycle

Windows Vista Support Lifecycle

The Windows Vista MessageBox Vulnerability Goes Unpatched

The True Limitations of Windows Vista Virtualization

Windows Vista Antivirus You Would Do Better to Avoid

Microsoft Will Evolve Virtualization Licensing for Windows Vista

Windows Vista Security Model - A Big Joke

Microsoft Can't Protect Customers Alone

Windows Vista Express Upgrades Live Next Week

Microsoft Leaps from the Most Secure Windows to the Most Secure Windows

Vista Security Gets Slaughtered

Windows Vista Defense-In-Depth

Vista Windows.old

Microsoft Is Excluding Users from Vista Security Features

Windows Vista Compatibility List Available

Insight into Windows Vista User Account Control

Vista Opened to Local Privilege Escalation

IE7 Security Features Should, In Theory, Protect the Computer?

Microsoft Will Kill Window Vista Ultimate Early

Vista's UAC Issues Extend to Security Policies

Windows Vista's Target: Half of the Windows XP's Bugs

Windows Vista Lives in Full Only with 4 GB RAM

User opinions:

No user comments yet.
Be the first to express your opinion using the form below!

Share your opinion:

Your Name:
Your Email Address:
(will not be used for commercial purposes)
Solve this to prove you're not a bot: =
Your review/opinion:

 




Windows tabGames tabDrivers tabMac tabLinux tabScripts tabMobile tabHandheld tabGadgets tabNews tab

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   ENTER NEWS SITE   |   ENGLISH BOARD   |   ROMANIAN FORUM