Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Science > Nano-Biotechnology

March 27th, 2008, 11:30 GMT · By Gabriel Gache

Studying the Properties of Antimatter

SHARE:

Adjust text size:



Enlarge picture
Most contemporary scientists would argue that matter and antimatter behave roughly in the same ways, however proving it is some kind of a challenge. Why? Well, mostly because there is hardly any antimatter in the universe today. Creating antimatter particles is relatively easy in our particle accelerators, capturing and studying them, on the other hand, is extremely difficult, as matter annihilates antimatter, leaving only energy behind.

The ATRAP Collaboration, consisting of several international institutions, among which Harvard University, Forschungszentrum Julich, Johannes Gutenberg-Universitat and York University, proposes to begin the work into studying the properties of antimatter with the help of very cold atoms.
By doing so ATRAP succeeded lately to create hydrogen's antimatter equivalent, antihydrogen, and captured it into a magnetic field for study.

"Our most basic theories predict that antimatter should behave like matter," says Gerald Gabrielse from Harvad University. "This is exciting, because many said that it wasn't possible to produce antimatter in the environment that we did." Gabrielse's team proved that antihydrogen can be created into a region of space where the magnetic fields experience a minimum.

Creating antihydrogen

According to ATRAP scientists, the creation of antihydrogen begins with the creation of an antiproton particle, which is then slowed by bringing it to a temperature close to four degrees above absolute zero. Then positron particles are created and also slowed down. The two antimatter particles are then forced into a collision, to create an antihydrogen atom. "If we do it at a low enough energy, there is a probability that they will get attached and form an antihydrogen atom," said Gabrielse.

There is a small problem though. Although it is antimatter and is believed that it should behave slightly differently than matter, antihydrogen, similarly to hydrogen, does not experience electrical charge, meaning it cannot be captured in an electrical field. However, by using a Penning ion trap inside a Ioffe ion trap the ATRAP team succeeded to capture the antimatter particle in a minimum magnetic field. Because antihydrogen atoms are cooled at extremely low temperatures, they have just the right quantum state which will keep them in place while inside a low magnetic field.

Although the method is ackonwledged to work, Gabrielse recognizes that it is unknown whether any antihydrogen atom has been captured yet. Their main goal was to demonstrate that the method is viable and the ANTRAP team is now working towards creating even cooler antiprotons and positrons so that the antihydrogen creation process achieves higher efficiency.

Higher antihydrogen creation efficiency immediately translates into greater quantities of produced antimatter, thus once this is done, the researching team could immediately start studying the differences between hydrogen and antihydrogen. "If we discover they have different properties, it will have huge implications at a fundamental level. If we find that they are the same, that reality does conform to theory, it's still a winning situation," adds Gabrielse.

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

2,577 hits · 3 comments · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


Bs Mesons, the Key to Antimatter Mystery

Weird Pulsar Becomes Even Stranger

CMS Is Finally Completed

Just Add Primordial Black Holes, Antimatter Will Soon Follow...

Large Antimatter Cloud Discovered in Galactic Core

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: Frank Clark on 11 Sep 2009, 15:11 UTC reply to this comment

Dear Mr. Gache,

I saw your piece on the Internet "Studying the properties of antimatter" and I
have a few questions that have puzzled me for some time. Perhaps you
could help.

Neglecting technical difficulties in doing the following thought
experiment, suppose we had masses of 1 kilogram of matter and 1 kilogram
of antimatter (same substance if that makes any difference) in a vessel
that kept them apart, and assuming the vessel weighed 0 grams (so we need
concern ourselves only with the vessel's contents):

1. What would the matter/antimatter combination weigh on earth at sea
level.

2. Suppose we are now in space with zero gravity and a continuous force
of 1 Newton is applied to the vessel containing the matter/antimatter.
What would be the acceleration of the vessel with the matter/antimatter?

3. Suppose the vessel (with 0 grams rest mass) were travelling at a
velocity close to light speed such that the relativistic mass of ordinary
matter would be twice its rest mass, what would be the combined
relativistic mass of the matter/antimatter?

4. Suppose we could actually weight the relativistic mass in #3 on a
scale on earth. What would it weigh?

5. Regarding relativistic mass, would there be any difference between the
relativistic masses of two particles, one travelling in a straight line
and the other rotating in a circular orbit with a tangential velocity the
same as the linear velocity? Would it make a difference if the particles
were charged vs uncharged? Matter vs antimatter?

If I have left out anything else of interest or importance, I would be
most appreciative if you added it.

Thanks,

Frank Clark

Comment #1.1 by: RMR on 13 Apr 2011, 20:22 GMT

1 kilogram of antimatter and 1 kilogram of normal matter would weigh 2 kilograms. As we believe now antimatter has mass and gravity as just as normal matter. However there is a new theory that anti matter has reverse gravity. It is an exact opposite CPT charge is backwards, Parity is backwards and Time is backwards. The mathematical models of this has been made and does not conflict with any of our current models only problem is why is there no antimatter planets, solar systems, galaxy's ect... and if there is why cant we see them? Wouldn't there be the opposite of the gravitational lensing evident in the voids between galaxy clusters?


Comment #2 by: not_a_scientist1 on 30 Sep 2011, 18:41 UTC reply to this comment

I just want to know what the chemical and the physical properties of antimatter are and how they are proved

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM