Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Life and Style > Beauty

April 22nd, 2009, 13:41 GMT · By

Shanna Moakler Says Miss California Did Not Deserve to Be Miss USA

SHARE:

Adjust text size:


While admirable for her boldness, Carrie Prejean did not deserve to be Miss USA, Shanna Moakler says
Enlarge picture
As Carrie Prejean is still doing the media rounds, explaining the answer that cost her the Miss USA crown, another beauty queen, Shanna Moakler, is speaking out on the controversy, saying Prejean did not deserve the title in the first place. In a post on her official MySpace page, Shanna says Prejean’s answer to the question of whether the state should allow same-gender marriages was sanctioned accordingly, because she did not deserve to be Miss USA.

Moakler begins her message by saying that, no matter how strong the media backlash against the reigning Miss California gets, she will not “abandon” her because what makes America so great is the freedom for everyone to speak their own mind. However, as brave as Prejean was for stating her opinion, she did not deserve the Miss USA crown for the simple reason that this is not what the title stands for, Shanna believes.

“But I want to explain to the masses, what the TITLE of Miss USA stands for to me, and being a former Miss USA, I feel I have a pretty good sense of it. Miss USA travels the world and she competes at the Miss UNIVERSE pageant as a representation of her country. She is a [sic] ambassador, a role model and needs to be able to show diplomacy on all issues. Sadly for California THIS is where we lost the crown. Not for her answer or even her beliefs, because again, sadly IN California her beliefs at this point in time are the majority. But she lost the crown because she wasn’t able to convey compassion for ALL the people that as MISS USA she would be representing.” the former beauty queen explains.

Prejean saying that she was raised to believe that marriages should only be between man and woman was taking matters a little too personally, though, Moakler states, just like many celebrity magazines have also pointed out. She could have chosen a more diplomatic approach, that is, a way to state her beliefs without offending anyone, the post further says. Still, the star believes something good can come out of this, because it has drawn attention to a topic that is of vivid interest these days.

“It did cost me my crown. I wouldn’t have had it any other way. I said what I feel. I stated an opinion that was true to myself and that’s all I can do. It is a very touchy subject and I see where [Hilton] was coming from and I see the audience would’ve wanted me to be more politically correct. But I was raised in a way that you can never compromise your beliefs and your opinions for anything.” Carrie Prejean was saying the other day about the comments that have made the tour of the world since last weekend. Still, she insists she was “biblically correct” in making them, and would not change anything about them even if she had the chance to do so. 

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

1,866 hits · 7 comments · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


Miss California Carrie Prejean Was Biblically Correct in Marriage Comments

Marriage Comments Cost Miss California Her Miss USA Crown

Miss England Beauty Queen Targeted for Being Black

Former Miss USA Tara Conner Goes into Country Music

Danielle Lloyd Uses Too Faced Lip Injection Extreme for Her Pout

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: Michael on 22 Apr 2009, 14:22 UTC reply to this comment

I would like to state I am proud of Carrie Prejean for standing up for what is right no matter how immoral and imaginestic (Def: liberal followers of the song Imagine's teaching) California gets. But to make a point even California voted against same sex marriage and it took a liberal court to put a stay on it. Hopefull in the next vote that stand will be affirmed. She also was Biblically correct. Abomination to GOD.

Comment #1.1 by: Heathen on 27 Apr 2009, 13:22 GMT

I have always wondered and been perplexed to see how well you-"biblical Americans" know what God wants and loves. Have you spoken to HIM by yourself and HE told you waht his likes/dislikes are?
One bunch of bigots versus the other one.


Comment #2 by: Ralph on 22 Apr 2009, 15:31 UTC reply to this comment

Moakler makes absolutely NO sense.

"Shanna says Prejean’s answer to the question of whether the state should allow same-gender marriages was sanctioned accordingly, because she did not deserve to be Miss USA. "

"Moakler begins her message by saying that, no matter how strong the media backlash against the reigning Miss California gets, she will not “abandon” her because what makes America so great is the freedom for everyone to speak their own mind."

So, Prejean can speak her mind (as a US citizen) but get deducted points for expressing an opinion Moakler disagrees with because that "is not what the title stands for".

er,, WTF?


Comment #3 by: Thuyen on 23 Apr 2009, 06:18 UTC reply to this comment

Moakler says that Miss Cali's answer did not cost her the title, but that her supposed lack of compassion cost her the title? Moakler is being two-faced about it.


Comment #4 by: Uhuru on 14 May 2009, 13:03 UTC reply to this comment

I guess Miss Prejean was "Biblically correct" when she was prancing around practically naked, had her breasts flapping in the wind, lying on her application, and having enlargements for the greater good of Christ. This gal is nothing but vanity and deceit crying crocodile tears. I don't give a rodent's rump what she believes. If this girl is an example of Christian values then I am John the Baptist. Thank God for Miss North Carolina!


Comment #5 by: Smokies1018 on 03 Sep 2009, 21:44 UTC reply to this comment

Oh get off it.

No one's perfect. Stop confusing imperfection for hypocrisy. That card is so old and overplayed that I want to puke.


Comment #6 by: christian on 20 Oct 2011, 16:54 UTC reply to this comment

I feel that marriage can only be "between a man an a woman" the way GOD intended it to be.

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM