Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Security > Digital Rights/Piracy

November 27th, 2010, 10:42 GMT · By

Seizure of Torrent Search Site's Domain Name Sets Dangerous Precedent

SHARE:

Adjust text size:


Feds seize Torrent Finder's domain
Enlarge picture
The Department of Homeland Security, allegedly with help from ICANN, has seized the domain name of Torrent Finder, a torrent search engine returning results also available on Google.

Since yesterday, users trying to access torrent-finder.com are greeted with a notice that reads: "This domain name has been seized by ICE – Homeland Security Investigations, pursuant to a seizure warrant issued by a United States District Court under the authority of 18 U.S.C. §§ 981 and 2323."

The message goes on to suggest that copyright infringement and trafficking in counterfeit goods are the reasons why this domain was forcefully taken from its owner.

The incident raises serious concerns for several reasons. First, there's the nature of the site itself, a search engine that links back to other websites.

Screenshot of Torrent Finder after seizure
Enlarge picture
In other words, what the government want to say is that Torrent Finder facilitated copyright infringement by returning results for non-copyrighted .torrent files, hosted on other sites, that could enable sharing of copyrighted works.

Since locating such files is also possible through Google, why isn't Google's domain also seized? Could it be because they are the largest Internet services company in the world? If that's the case then this is a really unbalanced and unfair distribution of justice.

In addition, the Torrent Finder admin told TorrentFreak that his registrar, Go Daddy, had no part in the domain seizure and that it was done directly by ICANN, the US-based organization managing the DNS root zone.

In May 2009, the European Commissioner for Information Society and Media, Viviane Reding, who now serves as European Commissioner for Justice, raised the issue of ICANN's accountability to a single government, the United States.

"ICANN decisions affect millions of citizens and companies in the world. The courts of California alone are certainly not best placed to handle legal challenges originating in all continents of the world," Mrs. Reding said [pdf] at the time.

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

2,163 hits · 1 comment · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


RIAA Believes Current or Former Lime Wire Employee Launched Pirate Edition

Court Shuts Down LimeWire over Copyright Infringement

Irish Judge Rules that ISP Can't Be Forced Into Three Strikes System

BT Resists Handing Over Customer Data to Law Firms

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: Ster on 17 Mar 2011, 11:22 UTC reply to this comment

LOL, this is funny, They are so worried about torrents, yet just about 80% of the people carrying a cell phone, iPod or other MP3 player are guilty by the letter of copyright infringement. "any duplication without written authorization" "with or without monetary gain".... Heck even Microsoft windows will rip your MP3's for you, whether you bought the CD or not. This isn't about copyrighting, this is about keeping the money where its wanted. Not about whats right or wrong.
Here's a novel idea,....
How about every new DVD and CD I or anyone buys can be registered online that I have bought it and own the "rights" to that CD. Should it become damaged it will be replaced for free minus shipping and handling.
Or be able to via my "registered data" be able to download it at will to be used by me, via the Right I earned by paying anywhere from 5 to 50 dollars for a piece of highly fragile plastic.

Just a thought

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM