Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
TRENDING TODAY
Home > News > Science > Space

June 28th, 2011, 13:55 GMT · By

Seeing an Universe Before our Own

SHARE:

Adjust text size:

This map shows CMB readings produced by the NASA WMAP satellite
Enlarge picture
University of Oxford theoretical physicist Roger Penrose is convinced that our Universe is not the first of its kind. His newest theory argues that a number of eons occurred before this one, and that the Big Band that spawned our Cosmos is just the latest in a string of many. But how can we test this?

What the expert is proposing is that the Universe continually cycles through these eons. When a new one begins – with a Big Bang – it develops and expands like we notice our Cosmos doing right now.

When it reaches the end of its cycle, the entire Universe collapses to produce another Big Bang, starting the cycle anew. Penrose does not believe that the time and the dimensions of space were produced only 13.75 billion years ago.

His theory is based on data collected by the NASA Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) satellite, a spacecraft that uncovered unexpected phenomena taking place in the cosmic microwave background (CMB).

According to Penrose, these data support the theory of conformal cyclic cosmology that he created. The issue with it is that the data runs directly opposite to the inflationary model of the Big Bang, to universal expansion, to dark matter and dark energy, and so on.

Under the inflationary model, the end result of dark energy-driven expansion will be a cold, uniform, featureless Universe. But the Oxford physicist does not believe that this model can account for they way everything was produced, and developed afterwards.

As per Physics World, Penrose believes that the inflationary model “cannot account for the very low entropy state in which the universe was believed to have been born – an extremely high degree of order that made complex matter possible.”

The model the scientist proposes an elegant explanation for the low entropy. As the Universe expands to become infinitely large, black holes accumulate more and more matter and information, until finally they evaporate, trillions of years into the future.

At that point, the Universe will be ready for another Big Bang, but will have very low entropy, since most of it would have already been eliminated by the black holes. Penrose claims to have proof of the existence of other Big Bangs.

He says that CMB data reveal concentric circles, where temperatures are lower than in their surroundings. Under the inflationary model, such features should not exist, as the CMB should be smooth, Daily Galaxy reports.



1,410 hits · 2 comments
Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


Black Holes May Form the Gravitational Equivalent of Atoms

Humankind Could Migrate in a Parallel Universe

Oldest Galaxy Ever Possibly Seen

Physicists Potentially Confirm CP Violation

LHC Sets New Collisions Record

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: Muslim Man on 27 Aug 2011, 20:25 UTC reply to this comment

We should have strong faith and belief in the existence of Almighty Allah (God) the only who is supreme and the greatest forever and is the creator of the universe, because nothing is made without creator. The purpose of humanity is to obey His laws as we are prominent amongest all His creation. He has only given us limited way of thinking. The prime purpose of universe is to recognise and accept him. He only was there in before universe, we are here in this universe alongwith His presence and the day of judgement will be the post universe scienario when we will all be accountable in front of Him. His great message is totally cleared in Al-Quran by His Messanger and Supreme amongest all the humanity, MUHAMMAD (Peace Be Upon Him). May Allah Azzawjal bless upon us all. Kind regards & Allah Hafiz.


Comment #2 by: Cyclops on 20 Nov 2012, 12:12 UTC reply to this comment

I completely disagree with Penrose's theories,the arrow of time points in one direction only.
I also do not understand the difficulty that scientist face,in understanding the acceleration of the universe.
It's clear that expansion or inflation,is a natural consequence of the genesis of the universe,from Lamda-Infinity.
That there is only one force that is pushing that expansion(nuclear),with NOT another force pulling,either back(gravity),must seem to me,to be the most elemental thing.

To enforce that logic to it's utmost,in the most simple terms,that even Penrose can understand, there is no 'force' stopping that expansion\acceleration,that is why it is doing just that.

If,on earth,I create a small air burst explosion,I can see all manner of reasons(forces)that have effects upon that event,that control it's course from beginning to end.
That is clearly not the case with the Big Bang ,where there were no pre-existing physics that determined the outcome of that event.
The notion,that a pre-existing 'universe' existed before our current one,is just pure speculative nonsense.
To suggest that the concentric rings evident in the CMB is prooof of his theory,is equally stupid,it's merely a 'phase' that occurred in the time following that event.
That 'phase' ot temperature drop,could be when massive amounts of gas were added to the mix,which could account for such change,or,it could simply be an 'anomoly'?

In truth,no one knows more than another,what counts,is scientific evidence,we should leave the 'mystery' part, to those well versed in the art of concealment of truth-religion.

Copyright © 2001-2013 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM