Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Microsoft > Windows

April 4th, 2008, 10:16 GMT · By

Screenshots Fiesta: Windows 7 Ultimate Build 6519

SHARE:

Adjust text size:


Windows 7 Ultimate Build 6519
Enlarge picture
In Redmond Utero, Microsoft is making headway with the development of Windows 7. But aside from small leaked bits and pieces of information about the next version of Windows, there are almost no official comments on Windows vNext. Designed as the successor of Windows Vista, the Redmond company revealed that Windows 7 had been in development since 2007, and in planning even before Vista had hit the shelves, as early as 2006. Additionally, Microsoft also pointed out that the development
process of Windows 7 is scooped three years after the consumer general availability of Windows Vista. This means that the next iteration of the Windows operating system is planned for 2010, after January 30.

At the end of December 2007, Microsoft made available Milestone 1 of Windows 7 to close partners and then went on to put the operating system in its early development stage at the disposal of antitrust regulators for review alongside Windows XP SP3 and Windows Vista SP1. But while the next version of Windows is in play, only a selected few managed to get their hands on the actual bits, leaving end users with nothing but crumbs from the Windows 7 feast. And speaking of crumbs, Paul Thurrott, via SuperSite for Windows, has a new screenshot gallery of Windows 7.

What you will be able to see is Windows 7 Milestone 1 Version 6.1 (Build 6519.1.x86fre.winmain.071220-1525) Ultimate. At this point in time, Windows 7 M 1 is not a standalone package. It is in fact designed to be installed on top of Windows Vista SP1 RTM, and this is the explication for the Ultimate edition label. And yes, little to nothing has changed compared to Vista, but this is an inherent scenario as Windows 7 is in the early stages of development. It is in fact tradition over at Microsoft to build the next version of a Windows operating system on top of the old one.

It happened with Windows XP and Longhorn and you can now experience it with Windows Vista and Windows 7. The differences are subtle and provide nuances rather than anything else. Microsoft has not even got to introducing the MinWin, stripped down core of the Windows platform into Windows 7 M1. At the same time, Windows 7 Milestone 2 is getting closer and closer, as it is planned for the April/May 2008 timeframe.

Windows 7 Ultimate Build 6519
Enlarge picture
Windows 7 Ultimate Build 6519
Enlarge picture
Windows 7 Ultimate Build 6519
Enlarge picture
Windows 7 Ultimate Build 6519
Enlarge picture

Windows 7 Ultimate Build 6519
Enlarge picture
Windows 7 Ultimate Build 6519
Enlarge picture
Windows 7 Ultimate Build 6519
Enlarge picture
Windows 7 Ultimate Build 6519
Enlarge picture
Windows 7 Ultimate Build 6519
Enlarge picture

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

17,895 hits · 6 comments · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


Deep Inside the Core of Windows 7

Microsoft Confirms Windows 7 for 2010 - No Word on Windows 7 M2

Free Windows for Supercomputers from Microsoft

Microsoft's Windows Server 2008 Looks to the Sun

Watch Steve Ballmer Mock Apple's MacBook Air

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: ghhh on 04 Apr 2008, 16:24 UTC reply to this comment

looks as rubbish as vista probably will take alot of resources and ram i still say xp is the best


Comment #2 by: Calcatian on 06 Apr 2008, 10:19 UTC reply to this comment

From the looks of it - it's very similar to Vista. But it will be even more resource hungry, more unstable and more pricey ;)
Wallpaper selection screen looks like a rip off of a famous desktop grade linux. So Win 7 will suck more - as expected!


Comment #3 by: Kennboy1 on 09 Apr 2008, 21:05 UTC reply to this comment

Lmfao, these screenshots are probably fake, so how would you know?


Comment #4 by: chibicitiberiu on 12 May 2008, 13:18 UTC reply to this comment

I don't see any difference between this and vista.


Comment #5 by: nav on 19 Jun 2008, 12:50 UTC reply to this comment

i think , you are an expert in using Adobe Photoshop. but you for got to change the version number bellow


Comment #6 by: Justme on 29 Aug 2008, 09:31 UTC reply to this comment

I have Vista Ultimate, and I like it. I *could* still run XP, but I won't. I like Vista to much now.

Still, I'm not sure what the point of the screenshots are. It's Vista with a couple of minor modifications. So what?

I won't upgrade to Windows 7 unless I get it for free, as I did Vista Ultimate. That's barring something fantastic being revealed about W7. I'm not seeing anything right now.

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM