NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Security

Security


Scientology Attacker Gets Prison Time

366 days in jail for DDoS

By Lucian Constantin, Web News Editor

23rd of November 2009, 14:59 GMT

Adjust text size:


Former Anonymous member Dmitriy Guzner sentenced to prison for DDoS attacks
Enlarge picture
Dmitriy Guzner, 19, of Verona, New Jersey was sentenced to one year in prison for launching distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks against websites belonging to the Church of Scientology in January 2008. Following his release, the young DDoSer will also spend two years on probation.

According to the prosecutors Guzner's attacks were acts of hacktivism and part of a larger anti-Scientology campaign led by a hacking group called Anonymous. In October 2008, the hacker became the first Anonymous member ever to be charged in connection with the group's actions.

Anonymous is believed to have originated on the notorious /b/ forum board of the 4chan website, the birthplace of many Internet memes, including lolcats. The members of this board are known as Internet trolls with a questionable sense of humor, who sometimes harass celebrities or other groups.

Anonymous members protesting
Enlarge picture
But the attacks against the Church of Scientology were much more than simple Internet pranks and escalated into a full-blown hate campaign. According to the attacked organization, Anonymous' actions consisted of 8,139 threatening phone calls, 3.6 million e-mails, 141 million hits on its website, ten acts of vandalism against its property, 22 bomb threats, and eight death threats against Church leaders.

Dmitriy Guzner pleaded guilty in May 2009 and admitted to intentionally impairing a protected computer belonging to the Church of Scientology. He faced a maximum of ten years in federal prison, but under sentencing guidelines, the final penalty was expected to be between 12 and 18 months.

Last week, the 19-year-old hacker was sentenced to 366 days in prison, followed by two years of probation. He was also ordered to pay $37,500 in reparatory damages, even though the Church of Scientology claimed it cost $119,500 to repair the damages caused by Guzner.

"It's well known that many people are concerned by the Scientology movement [...], but both Scientologists and the Anti-Scientology movement have sometimes done themselves damage by the way they have carried themselves on the internet. As I've said before, though, Even if you feel passionately and earnestly that Scientology is harmful to society, it does not make illegal action (such as an internet attack) against them acceptable," Graham Cluley, commented.

Hacktivism is a common form of protest on the Internet and Denial of Service is one of the preferred weapons in this business. Some of the times things can really get out of control, as it happened in 2007 when a Russian cyber-mob took down the entire Internet infrastructure in Estonia because the country's government decided to relocate a World Word II soviet memorial monument.

The world has not heard the last from Anonymous either. In September, the group declared war on the Australian Federal Government and its Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd for their intention of installing a country-wide Internet filter.

TAGS:

Dmitriy Guzner | prison sentence | distributed denial of service | DDoS attack | Church of Scientology
Read by 8,145 user(s) | Add comment | Link to this article TWEET THIS


Article rating:
Fair (2.5/5) 12 vote(s)    

Subscribe to news | Print article | Send to friend

© Copyright 2001-2010 Softpedia
Contact:

 

 

SEARCH THE NEWS ARCHIVE :




Today's News
| Yesterday's News | News Archive


MORE RELATED ARTICLES:


Attack Hits Swedish Signals Intelligence Agency's Website

Australian Atheists Under Attack

Iranian DDoS Mob Exposed to Drive-By Attacks

Melbourne International Film Festival Website Defaced

Church of Scientology DDoSer Pleads Guilty

Hacker Charged for Cyber Attacks Against the Church of Scientology

How Sarah Palin's E-Mail Account Got Hacked

User opinions:


Comment #1 by: Hartley Patterson on 24 Nov 2009, 13:48 GMT reply to this comment

The DDoS attacks in January 2008 quickly stopped after they were condemned by existing critics of the Church of Scientology. No hacking was involved - hacking is gaining unauthorised access to a computer, DDoSing is flooding servers with requests so that they overload.

The Church of Scientology has a proven record of manufacturing attacks on itself to gain sympathy. In 1977 for example the FBI discovered that it had attempted to frame journalist Paulette Cooper for making bomb threats. She narrowly avoided a long prison term.

The original Anonymous who still post on 4chan and anti-Scientology Anonymous have diverged over the past two years as the latter grew and are presently separate groups with little overlap. Comments on Anonymous forums indicate that the latter have no sympathy for illegal attacks and wish to oppose Scientology by legal means only.

Comment #1.1 by: OhOhOh on 25 Nov 2009, 10:21 GMT

As Hartley Patterson said. Those (still) involved in project Chanology practise only the so called "Ghandi tech". Way more fun, when dancing/ cheering in the streets.

See for yourselfs, and don't fall for the lies Scientology is spreading. As per their "Tech"
v
http://whyweprotest.net
^


Comment #2 by: ANON on 24 Nov 2009, 16:28 GMT reply to this comment

"consisted of 8,139 threatening phone calls, 3.6 million e-mails, 141 million hits on its website, ten acts of vandalism against its property, 22 bomb threats, and eight death threats against Church leaders."

this is propaganda that has never been proved. there are court cases surrounding scientology creating bomb threats themselves to discredit critics. so in essense nothing they say can be taken seriously. the acts of vandalism are complete BS as well.


SP Order. Fair game. May be deprived of property or injured by
any means by any Scientologist without any discipline of the
Scientologist. May be tricked, sued or lied to or destroyed. -L. Ron Hubbard.


Comment #3 by: correction on 24 Nov 2009, 17:14 GMT reply to this comment

I'd like to point out that the "Russian mob" had absolutely nothing to do with the cyber attacks on Estonia. News sites are still misreporting this long after the story broke that it was a 15 year old Estonian boy who perpetuated the attacks on his own country because he was angry they moved one of the old USSR soldier statues from the center of the square to a grave site.


Comment #4 by: Anulai on 24 Nov 2009, 19:26 GMT reply to this comment

Dmitriy Guzner

Doesn't seem so anonymous to me.


Comment #5 by: Anonymous on 24 Nov 2009, 19:58 GMT reply to this comment

His name was Dmitriy Guzner


Comment #6 by: aNONYmous on 24 Nov 2009, 20:40 GMT reply to this comment

His name was Dmitriy Guzner.


Comment #7 by: Balz on 24 Nov 2009, 21:07 GMT reply to this comment

Judean People's Front...


Comment #8 by: DMITRIY GUZNER on 24 Nov 2009, 21:08 GMT reply to this comment

His name is Dmitry Guzner.
We will never forgive.
We will never Forget.


Comment #9 by: Anonymous on 24 Nov 2009, 21:28 GMT reply to this comment

You broke rules 1 and 2.. FUUUUU


Comment #10 by: Horatio Caine on 24 Nov 2009, 21:45 GMT reply to this comment

All the information about the hate campaign came from a Scientology dvd. The FBI looked into Anonymous and they find nothing that connected the protest group Anonymous and the hate crimes that were reported by the church. Anonymous has done nothing but peaceful protests in the past two years.

Also Ddos is not hacking, it's fairly simple. All it entails is sending large amounts of data to a website. It takes several people doing this at once to take down a website, not one guy. This guy is just being used a sacrificial lamb.


Comment #11 by: A Nonny Moose on 24 Nov 2009, 21:46 GMT reply to this comment

"But the attacks against the Church of Scientology were much more than simple Internet pranks and escalated into a full-blown hate campaign."

Depriving a cult of its funds is not a hate campaign. Spreading the truth about a group of individuals with a proven track record of falsifying information, misleading authorities, in some cases lying to them outright, is not a hate campaign. Removing their ability to spread their lies and continue to take money from people that genuinely need an answer to life is not a hate campaign.

That being said, Anonymous does not sink itself to Co$'s level. We spread our information legally, we conform to all local ordnances and bylaws in addition to state and federal laws. The actions committed by the few does not justify retaliation against the many.

Mr. Guzner violated the code of Anonymous. It is for this that Anonymous does not grieve the loss of one of its minds. We are stronger because of this. This man is not representative of all of us. This is an aberration that has been cast from the collective. Do not judge us by this man. Judge us by the fact that Co$ has sought to eliminate us. Judge our danger from the hatred of a dangerous cult.

Anonymous does not forgive transgressions against the people. Anonymous does not forgive transgressions against Anonymous. We do not forgive. We do not forget.

Expect us.


Comment #12 by: Anon on 24 Nov 2009, 22:28 GMT reply to this comment

Hang in there brother. We'll getcha out.


Comment #13 by: Anonymous on 24 Nov 2009, 22:43 GMT reply to this comment

Scientology gets the last laugh here. Tens, if not hundreds of thousands of dollars were spent prosecuting Mr. Guzner -- of which scientology, being a tax exemption umbrella for the rich and famous -- contributed exactly zero.


Comment #14 by: anon on 24 Nov 2009, 22:45 GMT reply to this comment

http://i48.tinypic.com/ngrllu.jpg
Remember that...


Comment #15 by: David R. Davidson on 24 Nov 2009, 23:16 GMT reply to this comment

The author of this article needs to observe Rules 1 and 2.


Comment #16 by: Robert Cox on 25 Nov 2009, 00:02 GMT reply to this comment

What I find amusing about all these articles about "anonymous" is that journalists seem to think it's some kind of cult. In reality it's pretty much a bunch of social outcasts who stay up at all hours of night swapping porn, life stories and funny pictures.

There is no leaders, no hierarchy, no plan. Quit making 4chan out to be some sinister organization bent on world domination. If you're going to invent news, at least do something original. This isn't the first article I've read that assumed 4chan was a secret cult. I haven't read anything this stupid since they were saying Pokemon is a satanic brainwashing device. At least take a look at the site before you write about it. Needless to say you'll be underwhelmed.


Comment #17 by: Anonymous on 25 Nov 2009, 00:06 GMT reply to this comment

Anonymous never forgives and never forgets. He should have used more proxies, but still, he is a /b/rother out to do his duty to the Internet. His getting caught is his own fault, I admit, but he is still one of us.

One day $cientology will be crawling on its hands and knees as We, the free-thinking minority look over them, raising the axe for that final killing blow, and we will remind them of all their injustices, all the times they attempted to stop us, attempted to slight us.

We are unforgiving, we are venomous and spiteful. We may be social outcasts with nothing but misanthropic hatred inside of us, but we will wield that hatred like a burning sword to strike dead those who made us the way we are, and stand in our path.

Long live the Anonymous movement. Long live free-thinkers.

-Anonymous

Comment #17.1 by: Anon on 25 Nov 2009, 18:32 GMT

ddos through proxies? really? sodd maybe but im not even sure of that


Comment #18 by: Kevin Evans on 25 Nov 2009, 00:18 GMT reply to this comment

It's the Church of Scientology's fault for allowing DDoSing to happen. It's pretty easy to combat DDoS's with simple scripts. I don't understand why he has to spend 1 year in jail. Way over the top, in my opinion.


Comment #19 by: Anon on 25 Nov 2009, 00:42 GMT reply to this comment

Ok

this is not right, this one person could not have been resposible for an entire DDoS because it takes a few hundred computers working in unison to complete a DDoS succesfully.

Also where is the law suit against the person who on a regular basis decides to crash our forum with trojan attacks, instigating the same form of DDoS attack except by using vulnerable computers.

And the bots who on a regular basis fill our pages with stupid posts and have been known to cause the forum to shut down.

Thats just my 2 cents


Comment #20 by: FP on 06 Dec 2009, 13:45 GMT reply to this comment

Even if the dumbass got caught he's still a fellow /b/rother.

Remember this, we do not forgive, we do not forget, expect us.


Comment #21 by: Anon on 06 Dec 2009, 17:16 GMT reply to this comment

comment #19

he used a botnet most likely, several hundred machines infected with malware all controlled from a single point (modified IRC server probably)

Share your opinion:

Your Name:
Your Email Address:
(will not be used for commercial purposes)
Solve this to prove you're not a bot: =
Your review/opinion:

 




Windows tabGames tabDrivers tabMac tabLinux tabScripts tabMobile tabHandheld tabGadgets tabNews tab

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   ENTER NEWS SITE   |   ENGLISH BOARD   |   ROMANIAN FORUM