Scandal as Cheryl Cole Refuses to Vote, Katie Waissel Is Through Again
SHARE:
Adjust text size:
Fans of X Factor are again up in arms after last night’s show: by refusing to vote and pick a singer to save, Cheryl Cole has literally made it possible for Katie Waissel to go through to the next show.
Since Katie actually forgot the words to her “survival” song and she sat down on the stage saying “Oh, sod it!,” singing the same line over and over again, it’s no wonder voices online are now calling the show a fix.
As the Daily Mail points out, if anyone should have been sent home between Katie and Treyc Cohen, it’s probably Katie: not because she has a weaker voice or is a worse performer, but because she proved she couldn't do well under pressure, by forgetting the words.
However, members of the audience probably didn’t notice all that much that Katie was at a loss for words – literally – since they continued to cheer her on even after she was done singing.
So the latest controversy has nothing to do with that but rather with the fact that Cheryl Cole refused to vote: since both girls were from her camp, she declined to pick one to send home.
This way, she had the other judges make the choice for her and Treyc was sent home with two votes against her (Simon and Louis).
This is officially the first time in the history of the show that a judge refuses to choose a candidate to save / send home, which has sparked talk about how Cheryl gets to make her own rules.
“You are both talented women. I am refusing to send anyone home,” Cheryl said when the time came for her to cast her vote.
“The 27-year-old added she was prepared to take the vote to deadlock by making a choice once the other judges had voted, but Mr. O’Leary said it was against the rules of the show,” the Mail writes.
“Dannii Minogue then opted to save Treyc, while Louis Walsh selected Kaite. If Miss Cole had chosen Treyc, the girls’ fate would have been decided by the number of telephone votes each had received,” the publication further notes.
As viewers at home interpreted Cheryl’s gesture, she was simply doing what producers told her to do: namely, keep Katie on because, as Simon also noted, she’s more interesting to watch.
From this to conclude that the show is a fix since it’s not a real singing competition but a constant race for ratings was but a step: and many a viewer took it.
“Dermot was very clear. He asked Cheryl if she was refusing to vote. He told her if she refused it would simply be based on the majority. Those are the rules,” a spokesperson for X factor said shortly after the show, defending Cheryl’s right to abstain from voting.
Viewers are not that easily convinced, though: on Twitter, hundreds of voices are calling for watchdog Ofcom to investigate the show because it claims to be a competition when it’s not.
Below is Katie and Treyc in last show’s sing-off. Watch and judge for yourself whether critics are right in saying Cheryl should have voted.
its an absolute travesty that katie got through. even simon said that treyc was the better singer. this is a singing competition after all so why did he vote for here??? being more interesting doesnt make you a better singer.
an absolute disgrace and cheryl should be ashamed of herself by allowing this to happen again. katie should be out next week. i hope she ends up in the bottom two again. the public dont vote for her for a reason. she is annoying and turning on the tears and sinking to her knees is a drama queens way of making people feel sorry for her
cheryl did not refuse to vote! she wanted to let dannii and louis vote first (so she could hopefully take it to deadlock) how is that against the rules??? When two of simon's acts (diva fever and belle amie) were against eachother in the sing-off, they asked simon for his vote last which wasnt neccassary as louis, dannii and cheryl already voted to send diva fever home, so i personally think that its dermot's fault that katie is through because he didnt let cheryl vote.
Comment #4 by: Thomas Squid on 20 Apr 2012, 05:40 UTC
Who wrote this article? Surely it wasn't anyone who has studied English at a tertiary level. Whoever you are, you need to--rather desperately, in my opinion--work on getting your tenses sorted. This is very important in writing, which is--as I'm sure you're aware--an intrinsic function of communication. Understanding how a paragraph should be formed would also improve things. I don't aim to cripple your self esteem by presenting you with these comments--some of which I understand you will take as offence. But rather, I have assumed that you enjoy writing, or at least take it seriously, and I wish to point out that, if you do indeed take writing seriously, please address these problems as soon as possible.
Comment #4.1 by: Elena Gorgan on 25 Apr 2012, 14:53 GMT
Thomas, your concern is duly appreciated, albeit a bit misguided and/or exaggerated. No offense taken, because you failed to offer any arguments to back up what you assumed I might perceive as an insult. If you're still there, we'll talk – in perfect English, to your liking.