NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home / News / Science / Sci Pry

Sci Pry


Russian Weapons Against American Ones

The Russian missiles get anti-American upgrades

By Dan Talpalariu, Science Editor

5th of December 2008, 22:31 GMT

Adjust text size:


Russia upgrades its missiles to counter American war efforts
Enlarge picture
Instead of relaxing, under the common threat of the global financial crisis and in the light of new treaties against arms proliferation, the centuries-old tensions between the US and Russia have become even higher. As a result, or perhaps as a cause – who knows anymore? – the Russian military officials have announced they will equip their missiles with a series of upgrades that will enable them to avoid US weaponry and breach missile shields.

More specifically, the Interfax news agency cites the chief of the Russian Strategic Missile Forces, Colonel-General Nikolai Solovtsov, as stating that their intercontinental ballistic missiles will become more modern, so that they will be protected from US' missile defense system. The warheads will be enhanced so as to be able to fly "outside the range" of the space-based system, and to perform sharp dodging maneuvers, while the novel RS-24 missiles will be provided top-notch equipment that will allow to penetrate a missile shield.

The source of these measures proved to be the Washington's refusal to negotiate a worldwide ban of space weapons with China and Russia. Solovtsov thinks the US officials are considering a scenario where their first nuclear strike destroys the majority of Russian missiles and the little number of Russian weapons remaining quickly obliterated by the US missile defense system. "The Americans will never be able to implement this scenario, because Russian strategic nuclear forces, including the Strategic Missile Forces, will be capable of delivering a strike of retribution under any course of developments," he states, quotes MSNBC.

Furthermore, the US intends to install a contingent of ten missile interceptors in Poland, as well as a dedicated radar in the Czech Republic (supposedly non-related to Russia, but with Iran), strongly criticized by the Kremlin as potentially triggering a weapon race. Russians have responded by threatening to deploy short-range missiles batteries in Kaliningrad, close to Poland, unless the US drops their plans. With such approaches to global disarmament – a clash of titans offered as an example to the other nations by the two most important countries that should be the first to drop weapons – who can effectively anticipate what the fate of the world will eventually be?

TAGS:

war | missile | shield | weapon | nuclear
Read by 2,476 user(s) | Add comment | Link to this article TWEET THIS


Article rating:
Good (3.5/5) 4 vote(s)    

Subscribe to news | Print article | Send to friend

© Copyright 2001-2009 Softpedia
Contact:

 

 

SEARCH THE NEWS ARCHIVE :




Today's News
| Yesterday's News | News Archive


MORE RELATED ARTICLES:


The Weaponry Fate under Obama

Nuclear Bunker for American Officials Hidden in Plain Sight

Nuclear Plant Buildings Faulty, Warns NRC

Iran Launches Kavosh 2 Rocket

Lurker Missile Waits for Ten Hours Before Striking

Russian Submarine Crew Victims of False Alarm

A Multitasking Fighter Jet

User opinions:


Comment #1 by: Heathen on 06 Dec 2008, 09:47 GMT reply to this comment

Centuries-old tensions??? Come on, Dan Talpariu! United States has been a super-power for 60-70 years or 100 years at most. Russia has been a super-power for more than 300 years. 1990-s have been over already fortunately and US empire is perishing, so lets's not play tricks with words-it is not Russian Weapons Against American Ones, it is about a mere defence of national independence of Russia. Hungry and exhausted of mass obesity (in the direct meaning of the word) US wants more resources-oil, gas, clean water, rich soils.
The only solution and way out of this dreadful situation is to defend themselves. US has proved to be a worthless and good-for-nothing world leader. Russians< at least, with all their shortcomings would build schools, plants, universities and hospitals at their OWN ! expense. Nothing like that can be expected from Americans... Сognition comes through comparison...


Comment #2 by: Dan Talpalariu on 09 Dec 2008, 16:24 GMT reply to this comment

This is obviously an anti-American, pro-Russian point of view that I cannot comment on. But my choice of words is not arbitrary. Nor is the article in favor of any of the sides. Quite the obvious, actually. If you read other articles of this type, you'll read between the lines (or sometimes even straight on) that any money spent on killing people could instead help them tenfold, thus I cannot be supporting any country that chooses to insanely invest in military efforts.
Dan TalpaLAriu (sic!),
Softpedia Science News Editor

Share your opinion:

Your Name:
Your Email Address:
(will not be used for commercial purposes)
Solve this to prove you're not a bot: =
Your review/opinion:

 




Windows tabGames tabDrivers tabMac tabLinux tabScripts tabMobile tabHandheld tabGadgets tabNews tab

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   ENTER NEWS SITE   |   ENGLISH BOARD   |   ROMANIAN FORUM