|
|
|
|
February 5th, 2008, 13:46 GMT · By Monica Gaza
Revealed: Michael Jackson's Not the Father of His Kids |
|
|
|
SHARE:
Adjust text size: 
|
|
The story around the elusive former pop superstar Michael Jackson is getting stranger and stranger. Two days ago I was telling you all about how the reclusive singer finally allowed his two older kids to run around the Luxor Hotel Casino in Las Vegas without any masks or veils covering their faces. Well, I hadn't seen photos of Michael's kids in a while - not to mention the "no mask on" part, so it came as a bit of a shock to see that both ten-year-old Prince Michael I and Paris, nine, look cute, healthy and happy. Not that I expected otherwise - or maybe I did, at some level. I'm not exactly sure how best to explain it, but given that their father is one of the most eccentric celebrities out there and has a documented dislike of anything that involves public exposure, I had this (childish, I think) notion that the children might not be quite right, if you know what I mean. As far as looks go, at least, I was wrong. However, if you too were wondering how come both Michael's elder kids have flawlessly white skin, here comes the answer: they were indeed conceived by Michael's second wife, Debbie Rowe, but are
not his biological children. In fact, Rowe herself claims that Paris and Prince were conceived with the help of a sperm donor. "Michael knows the truth. He has to come clean" she is quoted as saying. The fact is, from what Rowe has stated over the years, we can deduce that she and Jackson entered what is called a "surrogacy agreement" in 1996, about nine months before they were officially married. What that means is that she agreed to bear his children - not his biological children, mind you - and got a nice little reward for it. The price tag? A staggering 6million pay-off (about $10 million), a 1.6million Beverly Hills home, a car, clothes, furs and jewels. Apparently, Jacko is still paying Debbie Rowe (whom he divorced a year later) about $50,000 a month. In the surrogacy agreement, Rowe agreed to "knowingly and voluntarily waive my right to contest Michael's paternity of either child" and "consent to Michael being declared the father". The strange part is that Rowe has completely renounced her child custody rights and has granted her former husband full custody of the couple's kids. She calls it a "gift" to Michael. So, let me get this straight - this lady, who married the pop star and then divorced him, is the mother of his children, who are not however his biological children, and also gave up any involvement in her kids' lives - all as a gift to Jacko and in exchange for a hefty paycheck. Is it just me, or this whole story is slightly eerie?
|
|
|
|
 |
107,576 hits
· 78 comments
Link to this article
· Print article
· Send to friend
|
MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:
READER COMMENTS: |
| Comment #1 by: Notafossilyet on 05 Feb 2008, 16:35 UTC | reply to this comment | He did what millions do. I see no problem with him having children the way he did. I do however find it irritating that Ms. Rowe would now be pointing the finger at him trying to make him look bad.
Let's see, she gets paid, and paid well for her part in this, and now she wants to say something about him? HE can't be that bad, she gave up custody to him.
Call Michael Jackson eccentric if you wish, but let's get the descriptions correct here. Debbie Rowe is a money grubbing gold digger, who didn't want those children. Instead of keeping her yap shut and letting these kids be healthy and happy she is the one who keeps coming out with all the details.
They are better off without having to deal with her. |
| Comment #1.1 by: JB on 27 Jun 2009, 18:30 GMT | It really is a shame that she had her hand out when he was alive and she trusted him enough to sell her custodian rights to him. That means those kids were up for sale. Those kids belong together and with people who will love them for who they are not for their money. This will turn into a real zoo. What a tragedy. |
| Comment #1.2 by: smarti on 04 Jul 2010, 13:46 GMT | All 3 children are his. Take a close look. They are growing up. They look like him. Really. Open your mind and don't listen to tabloids. |
| Comment #1.3 by: Christian on 01 Aug 2010, 17:59 GMT | Those kids have no African Amrican features(wide nose, kinky haiy thick lips) they are white blue-eyed and not his. Sure MJ is their daddy, just not their father. |
| Comment #1.4 by: Gg on 11 Oct 2011, 22:56 GMT | Smarti isn't so smart....Smarti should be riding the "short" bus. Moron... |
| Comment #2 by: Notafossilyet on 05 Feb 2008, 16:37 UTC | reply to this comment | Oh, and one more thing. Any man who has sperm can be a father. It takes a different sort of man to be a "Dad". Instead of saying Michael isn't the father, why not say what a great dad he is? Is that so terrible. |
| Comment #2.1 by: PandaTime on 12 Jul 2008, 04:00 GMT | Well, a lot of the stories that say he is a great are just mostly talking about how great his kids are. That doesn't really prove he's a great dad. I mean, the kids were probably around their nanny most of the time. |
| Comment #2.2 by: LightWriter on 06 Sep 2010, 21:10 GMT | And you would know Michael Jackson was a 'great Dad' how? |
| Comment #2.3 by: lisa on 24 Jul 2012, 19:15 GMT | u dont have 2 have a wide nose n kinky hair 2 be black n white i have kids that are black n white mixed n my son is as white as me n my grandson has sky blue yes n my daughter his mother is a dark skin mixed woman so they be micheals kids u never knw?? |
| Comment #3 by: princess on 06 Oct 2008, 10:43 UTC | reply to this comment | I think this article has been made up by someone, even journalists lie to try and make money. Michael Jackson is the biological father of his children. |
| Comment #3.1 by: wibby on 15 Jul 2009, 12:15 GMT | c'mon, Michael Jackson is not the biological father of those children. I think the children deserve the right care and love and most probably that should come from Michael's family, but eh eh, he ain't their biological father.
its no rocket science. genetically, michael jackson is of African origin. those children has no African gene in them at all. |
| Comment #4 by: yousuf on 26 Jun 2009, 11:34 UTC | reply to this comment | im sooo upset his acheivments are amazing shame he dint get to do his toure he nwill NEVER be forgotten... |
| Comment #4.1 by: BEAUTY on 15 Oct 2010, 21:00 GMT | WELL IT IS TRUE IS IS NIT THE BIOLOGICAL FATHER
I MEAN YEA YOU COULD LOOK AT THEM AND TELL THAT HE IS NOT
BUT DONT JUDGE HIM WHOEVER YOU ARE AND STP MAKING A BIG DANG
DEEL OUT OF IT .OK.?OK |
| Comment #5 by: evelyn osemwengie on 26 Jun 2009, 14:04 UTC | reply to this comment | i love legend micheal jackson i miss him so much and he will always be in our memories till we met agan good bye micheal i love you and the whole world will allways remember you....... |
| Comment #6 by: Phyllis on 26 Jun 2009, 17:24 UTC | reply to this comment | Get your glasses on. His children are obviously 100 percent white. There is not an ounce of black blood there. |
| Comment #6.1 by: Todd on 08 Jul 2009, 13:53 GMT | I'm sorry, but take a look again. Especially the boys' eyes and noses. I have many a creole in my family - several of which look less "black" than all three of his children.
And really what does it matter. Children are adopted every day ... that doesn't mean that their parents are NOT their parents. The fact of the matter is that he left behind 3 children that loved him and are missing their daddy. Have a heart people. |
| Comment #7 by: Matt S. on 26 Jun 2009, 19:13 UTC | reply to this comment | Jackson is remebered in all of our hearts, R.I.P Jackson, he is not to blame for this crisis. We love mj, R.I.P |
| Comment #8 by: lez on 29 Jun 2009, 02:31 UTC | reply to this comment | Michael Jackson could not possibly be the father of the two oldest children. They are fully white. Although Michael Jackson had a rare skin disease, it can't change his DNA. |
| Comment #9 by: Ash on 01 Jul 2009, 13:12 UTC | reply to this comment | I dont see anything wrong with what Michael did... u know how many people have kids through sorrugate and sperm donors??? why should HE be judged for it? Besides, who cares if hes not the BIOLOGICAL father. being a father is more than just donating ur sperm!!!! He raised them and loved them and PROTECTED them from the stupid media who he knew would destroy their lives like they are now. if anyone is at fault its their DISGRACEFUL mother!! who put her children up for sale... what kind of mother trades her children for money.... She is just SICK. and now she's trying to make it look bad on michael..... I hope she has NOTHING to do with these kids for the rest of their lives.. |
| Comment #10 by: Sara on 05 Jul 2009, 05:45 UTC | reply to this comment | I think it really doesnt matter if Michael is the biological father or not... I think hes a great father, he luvs these kidds, and treated them the best he could... he gave these kidds a great life, and a been a great father.... when his three kidds grow up, they should be appreciated of what Michael had give them... I LUV U MICHAEL JACKSON UR SUCH A GREAD PERSON MAY GOD BLESS U!!!!!! AS for Debbie, I cant believe she did that.... I cant believe she ruined these kidds life, shes such a bastard... I mean is not like Michael made her to do that, shes actually the one offerin him, and Michael the other hand been nice enough to actually pay her, and take care of her... I think Debbie should have nothin to do with these kidds for the rest of their lives, and she should be the one who gets blamed 4 on everythin... |
| Comment #11 by: KG on 06 Jul 2009, 21:02 UTC | reply to this comment | Hi
You all, I think MJ did a great job...with his kids and with his music and with his money. The legend, never to be forgotten. Who on this earth is 100%??? You all haters suck!!! RIP MJ |
| Comment #12 by: Earth on 08 Jul 2009, 00:54 UTC | reply to this comment | Why can't some people get over this color thing? Looks can be deceiving it has been proven in history time and time again some political figures who were thought to be white weren't. We come in many colors. And as long as the kids get love they are better off. |
| Comment #13 by: :) on 08 Jul 2009, 15:09 UTC | reply to this comment | Michael Jackson really IS the father of all three of his children... |
| Comment #13.1 by: KD on 14 Jul 2009, 21:16 GMT | Michael is the father of his 3 children, he raised them, he loved them. He was a wonderful person and father. Listen to his songs. Listen to the "Earth Song", "We Are The World", "Heal The World", Man In The Mirror", I Will Be There" and so many more. Think about it... crazy, wacko, child molesters don't write anything like that, they wouldn't even think of anything close to those words because those kind of people are narcissist and only think of what they want, not about the world as a whole and what others are suffering from.
Micheal Jackson was (and still is through his songs) a philanthropist... a charitable, caring, loving human being that never felt accepted, except through his music. If anyone made him seem weird it was all the haters and scammers that made him want to escape from the world. We will never know what he endured. I love Michael Jackson and I am heart-broken that I wont get to hear a new song from him ever again. I feel blessed to have lived at the same time he did so that I can say I experienced when all of his songs came out.
Rest Michael... You are loved by so many. |
| Comment #14 by: neshah on 08 Jul 2009, 18:05 UTC | reply to this comment | well,in an interview,michael said clearly that HE IS the biological father of all his 3 children.The woman who gave birth to Prince Michael 11[blanket],was a black woman,and blanket also was his own children but he only used another woman.He does not pay debbie and did not pay her for having the babies.He said that debbie gifted him paris and prince michael 1 because she knew how Michael loved and wanted his own children!!!!!!!!! |
| Comment #15 by: debbie h. on 08 Jul 2009, 18:34 UTC | reply to this comment | I think it does not matter if MIchael is the biological father or not. His daughter Paris said it all he was a great daddy and she loves him. who cares about Michaels past not every one is perfect and he has been forgiven from all his sins. God forgives so every one else needs to let it go. To michaels kids and family you are all in my prayers and thoughts. May you find comfort in jesus. |
| Comment #15.1 by: JDM on 15 Dec 2011, 02:24 GMT | God forgives all who believe Jesus Christ is the son of God, who accept Christ as their personal Lord and Savior, and who confess that they are a sinner and repent asking for Christ to forgive them. God doesn't forgive all of us without us asking or without us accepting Christ. I hope that Michael did this. If so then yes, he is forgiven no matter his former sins and is with God. |
| Comment #16 by: pamela on 09 Jul 2009, 00:41 UTC | reply to this comment | I agree that people do not understand COLOR! What is 100% WHITE? Can someone explain that to me? I don't think it exists any more than 100% BLACK. And the bottom line is that it shouldn't matter at all. Michael is not 100% Black or 100% White and his children are not either, whether they are his biological children or not. |
| Comment #16.1 by: Rick on 10 Feb 2011, 00:20 GMT | Having studied Anthropology for over 30 years I can tell you that "Skin Color" is not the only difference between races..There are three main racial groups , Caucasoid (White), Mongoloid (Asian), and Negroid (Black)...The differences between them are way more than the tone of their skin...Skeletal structure, Brain size, and temperment are just a few of the myriad differences...The sure way to tell what a person is is by DNA testing. A lot of Russian people have some percentage of Asian blood in them, and a certain percentage of Southern Europeans have African blood in small amounts. I can tell you beyond a shadow of doubt that these children cannot be his children...they would have some negroid features and they do not....As for Michaels "Rare Skin Disease" that someone mentioned, It is called Vitiligo, and it does not cover all of your skin...He has claimed in interviews that he wears white makeup to even out his skin tone from the blotches...Well, when Black people get this condition, they have 20 to 60% of white spotches and the rest of thier skin remains the original color, in his case brown...so why would he have chosen to whiten his skin, rather than using brown makeup to cover the white splotches?????It's because he is lying, that's why...He has had a complete bleaching of his skin by a plastic surgeon..That is the truth!!! Did you ever wonder why he sometimes wore white tape on his fingertips??? It's because black peoples fingernails appear dark, and aginast the white skin they looked like ugly frankenstien nails, so he tried to cover them...He was an extremely sick person , who cringed in interviews when sex was mentioned...I wish people would stop repeating the stupid lies that they are told... |
| Comment #17 by: gennifer on 09 Jul 2009, 01:06 UTC | reply to this comment | yes you can you are the "wacko" Jack! they are not completely white and plus my mother is italian and my father is black and I have olive skin. and skin color doesn't have to be the same as either parent. my cousin is way lighter then BOTH her parents so i guess ur saying skin color is everything hmmm? |
| Comment #17.1 by: firstknowbeforyoutalk on 27 Jul 2012, 21:18 GMT | if you study Antropology , better not to speak about the skin diseases, brain size e.t.c. it's way beyond your profession. Vitilgo can make you 80-90% white just take 10 min to search pictures of patients in the internet and doctor's advice. it starts at some spots and progresses every where till most percentage of your skin loses it's pigment. To avoid multiple colour of the skin one of the advice is to bleach the skin, use thick makeup e.t.c. Most patient like michael prefer bleaching the skin(mostly facial skin which can make you judged by the people while the body remains because it's handy you don't have to wear makeup everyday especailly incase of micheal it's hard to cover it with makeup because of his job condtion and most public appearance ) and he did bleach some parts of his skin not all of it If you do listen the interview that his mom gave he still do have remained black skin in his inner body. You know how it is painfull to be judged by something that you can't controll and even more by something that is disease and you don't want that?, being ignorant that wouldn't listen even if he told that he have skin diseases not bleached because he doesn't like the color of his skin but still talk and stand on what they want to belive. Soory you just seem as one of those trying to magnify that he could wear brown makeup instead of bleaching,, but he is not like you that could be able to got to toilet from stage to adjust his makeup.You are not in his shoes really and don't make his condition and sikness to hit up your recial superiority and inferioirity and preference. Don't just try eat while killing the spirit of other people. I personally always felt bad for him even befor his death about how people judged him wrongly, they ruined his life, stell his confidence for appearing in the face public.... Try to understand him at least after his death |
| Comment #18 by: brie edmond on 09 Jul 2009, 09:07 UTC | reply to this comment | I know that the first two are not his biologically because there is jus no way for a black man to produce white children...they don't look a bit bi racial neither do they even look like Michael. Either way it goes those are his children and he loved them...I think the black community gets pissed about it because it has been speculated that Michael Jackson did not like the fact that he was african american and to some people it looks as if that's why he had this lady get the sperm of a white man...it makes it seem like he didn't want his children to be black either. He was an awesome performer, I am a big fan however u have to admit that the man had some issues. |
| Comment #19 by: diddy on 09 Jul 2009, 10:14 UTC | reply to this comment | Whatever the situation, every kid in this world needs caring parents, whether biological or not. Besides there are lots of children raised by guardians and may receive more love and care from them than they would from their own biological parents. Michael gave himself to be father of these kids, he loved and cared for them, and that's what matters. They will never call anyone their father in this world apart from from Michael. |
| Comment #20 by: Aisha on 09 Jul 2009, 10:57 UTC | reply to this comment | Well, Michael has left this earth and will be judged by God for his belief and the good and the bad he did in his earthly life--as will all of us. I pray that his faith was pure and that God has Mercy on his soul and forgive him of anything that was displeasing.
Let's remember that Michael has gone before us all but, it's no doubt, that we will all be following him and taking that unforeseen path and journey that he is now in.
I loved his music, his dancing and I loved him as a humanitarian individual. He had struggles, and ups and downs, trials and tribulations like everyone, but I will always love him no matter what and I am truly sadden that Michael left so abrumptly without knowing how the masses of the majority truly loved him across the globe --from the from the Americas, to Europe, to Africa, the Middle East and Asia.
Yes, he will be missed and and his legendary memories will be chereished more than the few flaws that he had and it's so unfortunate that the human being allows his/her evil desires to take over and ponder and rejoice over the misfortunes of others rather than the uncountable good that an individual, like Michael, contribrutes in his lifetime.
Although Michael was the King of Pop, he was still a sensitive man who loved humanity more than they loved themselves--yet he was criticized and misjudged by the sinistal media and the money mongals. Yes, Michael made millions but it was his money and he also gave millions away to others and for many causes.
Michael, I love you and I know your fate is in the hands of ALLAH and only HE will and can judge you.
To his lovely family - stay strong and best regard and wishes to his Mother, Father, brothers, siters and children. |
| Comment #20.1 by: dodger22 on 11 Oct 2011, 19:36 GMT | Well said! xxx |
| Comment #20.2 by: N.M. on 06 Sep 2012, 15:27 GMT | WELL SAID MJJ WAS THE MOST WONDERFUL HUMANBEING EVER. HE IS MISSED AND WILL FOREVER BE MISSED.R I P NOW MICHAEL YOU GAVE THE WORLD SO MUCH JOY THROUGH YOUR MUSIC. |
| Comment #21 by: Kevin Allen on 09 Jul 2009, 14:36 UTC | reply to this comment | To Say That his kids really arent his kind of make since. If you look at Blanket he looks like the child of a black and white couple. They will sometimes have dirty brown hair and their skins are way darker than a white person and more brighter than a bright black person. Look At Paris and Prince Michael they look fully white. I Know The Skin Dease he had doesnt run in his genes. You Can Just TELL Though That Michael Has Been A Good Father. R.I.P M.J. I HEART MICHAEL JACKSON |
| Comment #22 by: Megan Duffy on 11 Jul 2009, 21:58 UTC | reply to this comment | Well i have to say that i believe Michael Jackson is the father of all three kids cauze Debbie is white ya know nd so is M J . And c,mon the kids are a bit tanned like M J nd as if M J would pay Debbie money just to keep her mouth shut that M J is not the real father now c,mon that would be a stupid thing to do . And i do believe he is the father cauze he loved kids so much nd when Debbie waz married to him she could tell that he wanted kids of his nd she gave him that so don,t believe in the headlines cauze there just rummors . So may God rest your soul R.I.P M J . xxxxx |
| Comment #22.1 by: kevin on 29 Oct 2011, 18:44 GMT | MEAGAN THAS STUPID BECAUSE YOUS SAID MICHAEL JACKSON IS WHITE!!!!! he african american and he as a skin disorder so it wouldnt effect his........ i cant im sorry.. no common sense |
| Comment #23 by: Lori L from Indiana on 15 Jul 2009, 02:51 UTC | reply to this comment | To me, all 3 of the kids look 1/2 black, 1/2 white. Debbie Rowe is really white. With the new pics of seeing the kids without their masks at the funeral, they have much browner skin then their mom and their eyes are shapped as a Black person AND - Paris nose matches the Jacksons. Blanket - LOOKs like Michael and he is apparently shy - Michael was shy. I think they are biologically his. We have seen limited pics over the years, and photography lighting is not always consistent. What we saw from them at the funeral, I thought they looked 1/2 and 1/2. |
| Comment #23.1 by: menchy fl on 25 May 2010, 12:51 GMT | i believe that michael jackson was a great human being and a very gread dad its doesn't matter now if was the biological dad he still love them deerly rip mj |
| Comment #24 by: Cat on 18 Jul 2009, 01:16 UTC | reply to this comment | I think they could have been tanned just a little for the memorial service. |
| Comment #24.1 by: dodger22 on 11 Oct 2011, 19:45 GMT | Is that really what you believe the Jackson family would have considered as being important on the day of their son's memorial service?, I mean seriously? you think it would be perfectly natural for one of them to say...."Oh, lets not forget to get the children a spray tan, I mean we don't want the public to think they are looking on the pale side?, or god forbid, white even!" You are being ridiculous. |
| Comment #25 by: Emily on 20 Jul 2009, 19:45 UTC | reply to this comment | In my eyes, family isn't blood it isn't biological, it's love. It doesn't matter wether this rumour is true or not. Michael love those kids and they loved him, therfore they are family. Debbie Rowe could have easily been paid to say those things, as she was paid to give Michael full custody. Prince, Paris, and Blanket ARE Michael's Children.
On that note, Debbie Rowe is a terrible gold digger! First of all, she sold out her children to Michael, well being paid with money, a house, and other things mentioned in the artical above. Even worse, now that Michael has passed away, she wants the children back! Most likley knowing that they will be reciving most of Michael's fourten. Give Michael his final wish, let the children stay with the nanny, or whomever makes them happ, because that is what Michael would want for his children.
We Love and Respect You Michael Jackson
R.I.P. |
| Comment #26 by: Tamar Belillti on 14 Aug 2009, 06:46 UTC | reply to this comment | I agree it doesn't matter whether those children are identical to Michael Jackson or not! Obviously they aren't bottom line here is, he raised them since they all were born, loved them , continues to love them, so biological really isn't relevant at this point end of story! |
| Comment #27 by: Ariana on 05 Dec 2009, 15:53 UTC | reply to this comment | would you leave those kids alone! All of us fans believe that he is the father of those kids and he did anything to protect them! if yall hated michael jackson then leave him alone! he is gone now and everybody is sad but you! he did his best to try to get all of you to like him but nooo you continue to talk bad about him. Now that he died everybody that was talking about him wants to feel bad and try to fit in with everybody else. That is pathetic! If you dont like him dont. Just quit messing with him, its people like you that made his life hard!!! sooo he got a skin disease and he tried to get his nose right, people understand that! And we didnt care, we liked michael for who he was and just because he changed dosent mean you dont have to like him anymore! Even if he wasnt the father of those kids who cares. He have been there for them their whole life and times they had with him were the best of there lives. And to see him die out of nowhere is really depressing. To see those kids at his funeral was sad, and that heart breaking speech from paris was soo loving i cried! i feel so bad for them, and you should to!! i know prince was all strong and everything but imagine seeing blanket and paris cry! that is really sad and i cry everyday to see how them kids feel. I give my heart to Michael and his kids! |
| Comment #28 by: arona on 10 Dec 2009, 00:00 UTC | reply to this comment | I think that blanket is Michael's true son ,it's something about his eyes .the Jacksons all have beautiful eyes and when i look at picutures of michael when he was little his eyes were so so beautiful and blanket has those same kind of eyes.. |
| Comment #29 by: A friend on 10 Dec 2009, 01:25 UTC | reply to this comment | It's slander
You say it's not a sword
But with your pen you torture men
You'd crucify the Lord
And you don't have to read it (read it)
And you don't have to eat it (eat it)
To buy it is to feed it (feed it)
Then why do we keep foolin' ourselves
Just because you read it in a magazine
Or see it on the TV screen
Don't make it factual
Though everybody wants to read all about it
Just because you read it in a magazine
Or see it on the TV screen
Don't make it factual, actual
They say he's homosexual
--Michael Jackson, Tabloid Junkie |
| Comment #30 by: Kay on 01 Feb 2010, 06:43 UTC | reply to this comment | i was wondering who were these children in the latest pics from the awards! wow just wow |
| Comment #31 by: Charlotte on 24 Feb 2010, 21:26 UTC | reply to this comment | Remember Michael Jackson made this arrangement with Debbie Rowe cuz his former wife refused to have his children, so he kicked her to the curb,and brought in Debbie. I read that some where on the internet. It was a shame that he had to do things that way, with him being so famous. I mean I would have gladly had his children. I fell in love with a ten or twelve year old Michael, when I was just a kid. He was a very cute boy and didn't need any plastic surgery. His sisters are some of the most beautiful black women in the world, who it looks like, have had very little if anything done (plastic surgery) to their faces. God could have made Michael to be a very handsome man if he would have just had a little patience. I think the world just wanted a child from him before he died. After all the world did own him in a way. |
| Comment #32 by: anyc on 02 May 2010, 21:08 UTC | reply to this comment | I don't think 6 million is a hefty paycheck at all; in fact, I think that women, consistently devalued by men on all the things they can do as well as men, are even more so when it comes to childbirth, which men, obviously, can never achieve; they devalue it to make themselves feel better and make the CREATION of life something less than the absolute power that it is. It may be more than difficult for men to empathize, I still ask them: how much would you consider the gestation of another human being inside your own body, and giving the resulting human being to someone else worth? The fact that the author thinks 6 million is a hefty paycheck for this god-like feat, but probably would not think twice about it being the renumeration a pro basketball player gets for 1 or 2 months of GAME-PLAYING is rather disturbing. |
| Comment #33 by: Charles Long on 19 Jun 2010, 18:22 UTC | reply to this comment | this is sooo sick!!! Michael and his family climbed out of poverty with the rarest of talent...only to give it away to children [that belong to a ugly woman] that don't belong to him. What a smack in the face to the Black community that lifted the family to prominence. The most socially-bridging talent hates his own race.... |
| Comment #34 by: kayla on 27 Jun 2010, 03:19 UTC | reply to this comment | i think the real problem is with Debbie cuz i know i wouldn't give my child/children away for ANYTHING, yet she divored michael and gets all this shit from him for the children. its awful, if you ask me. |
| Comment #34.1 by: sarena118 on 20 Sep 2010, 03:40 GMT | Hi, Please do your homework. There is a lot of info on line about MJ. enter what u want 2 know in your search box, choose a safe site |
| Comment #35 by: eshizzle on 28 Jun 2010, 18:06 UTC | reply to this comment | that is not true those r michaels children its all a lie |
| Comment #36 by: phoebekap on 29 Jun 2010, 12:16 UTC | reply to this comment | LIARS! All of you LIARS! Prince Michael I has vitilago just like his dad and that proves it beyond a shadow of a doub that MICHAEL JACKSON IS THE BIOLOGICAL DAD OF HIS CHILDREN! Why would he spend his time and energy on "other people's kids"? He has lots of nieces and nephews to dot on, if all he wanted was ANY child! Those kids are Michael's kids and GOD is proving HIM, MICHAEL JACKSON right in every way - answering from heaven that 1) he was NOT trying to be white, he did have a skin disease called vitilago and 2) That Michael is biological dad to his children cause now Michael Jackson Jnr (also known as Prince Michael I) has vitilago just like his dad! I hope the kids hire a lawyer and sue every cent out of everyone who defames Michael Jackson! |
| Comment #37 by: resarenee on 23 Sep 2010, 03:02 UTC | reply to this comment | Those children are Michael's, they are pretty brown to me... I've seen bi-racial children all my life and they are most definitely bi-racial. Give them a few more years and we'll all see alot clearer... Prince has vitilago something like his dad, and the all have african features, check out their noses and pigmentation in the nukels.knees... They're black, believe that... |
| Comment #38 by: TRUTH on 30 Sep 2010, 02:45 UTC | reply to this comment | This article was from 2008 before MJ died. He is not the biological dad and anyone with a brain in their head can see that. What does it matter anyway? Why does it have to effect the way you feel about MJ? He had a body dysmorphic disorder and changed himself from black to white. Do you really think he wanted children who looked like himself? Remember what QJ said and others who really knew him. He was filled with self loathing. He's not the father and nothing you say will change that. |
| Comment #39 by: tabetha robinson on 24 Oct 2010, 18:34 UTC | reply to this comment | yoy have some nerve to say that singer michael jackson is not there father is he is to all three of them look just like michael * if you put up a picture of michael when he was young and you put up a photo of michael,s kids you,ll see that michael jackson it the biogical father of not 1 not 2 but all three of michael,s kids they are his get that though you head prince looks like michael,s twin they all do you live the man alone and leave his kids alone just liek michael said why don,t you just beat it jack!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
| Comment #40 by: babycat on 09 Dec 2010, 19:11 UTC | reply to this comment | im sorry ya'll but i speak for all the african americans people and we know how black children comes out and they sure don't come out like those three. Prince and paris are white and blanket is hispanic, not mj's children! end of discussion |
| Comment #41 by: babycat on 10 Dec 2010, 19:25 UTC | reply to this comment | im sorry ya'll but i speak for all the african american people and we know how black children comes out and they sure don't come out like those three. Prince and paris are white and blanket is hispanic, not mj's children! end of discussion |
| Comment #42 by: Sally on 17 Mar 2011, 23:55 UTC | reply to this comment | Well will we ever know who his third wife was? |
| Comment #43 by: MEMO on 19 Mar 2011, 06:40 UTC | reply to this comment | MICHAEL I KNOW THAT U R ALIVE OKEY COME OUT NOT BECAUSE UR FATHER AND FAMILY HIRTS U. U HIRTS ALL PEOPLES HEART. I AM REALLY SAD FROM U .I HOPE THAT WHO SEE THIS BELIEVES THIS MASSAGE .SORRY THAT I SAID UR SECRET.I CAN NOT SLEEP .MESSAGE NO.1 FROM MEMO |
| Comment #44 by: Jan Doe on 12 May 2011, 01:39 UTC | reply to this comment | She gave birth to kids for him for the money. They were kids well taken care of. He didn't want her because he was not into women. The kids were to improve his image because they would grow up and tell the world what a great dad he was. Nothing wrong with any of it. The only thing I don't understand is why he did not have his own biological kids. I am guessing Debbie is not the biological mom. I am guessing that if Debbie was the mom he feared he would have problems with her wanting a bunch of money later and custody. It is hard to trust people when your as rich as he is. He wanted Lisas kids because she was rich herself and because she was Elvis's kid. There was a lot of logic in many things he did. The mask was because he had a double to shake hands with the fans while he made a getaway. The kids veils were so the kids could go out without fans bothering him. He was smart. |
| Comment #45 by: kriscee ae on 01 Jul 2011, 19:33 UTC | reply to this comment | i had a feeling when i looked at those children i sad they couldnt of bin his because they have no african american lookz and even through his skin disease his sperm cant make white children |
| Comment #46 by: kts on 07 Jul 2011, 02:26 UTC | reply to this comment | I don't really think that those are really michael jackson kids either. |
| Comment #47 by: nikiie on 13 Jul 2011, 22:40 UTC | reply to this comment | micheal jackson did the right thing to claimed that he wanted custody by other sibling and relative to finish his job.......nice job(mj) |
| Comment #48 by: WhyAreYouArguing on 09 Aug 2011, 22:37 UTC | reply to this comment | Whether they are his biological children or not is irrelevant. He loved them, he parented them, and they bear his name and his legacy. They are his children, and whatever self-righteous thrill you're getting out of arguing the point, what you think does not amount to a hill of beans. |
| Comment #49 by: MJ's forever friend on 09 Sep 2011, 19:50 UTC | reply to this comment | Michael's children look like Debbie and him. You can see it clearly in their eyes. They are beautiful kids..... just like their Dad. He would be so proud of them today as they carry out his mission of "love".
Anonymous:) |
| Comment #50 by: MELA on 10 Sep 2011, 12:54 UTC | reply to this comment | they are all children of MJ especially blanket.he really look like his father. the eyes!! their eyes is MJ eyes.believe me. i saw thier picture,and i believe ALL OF THE CHILDREN ARE HIS BIOLOGICAL CHILDREN. |
| Comment #51 by: BSHA on 10 Sep 2011, 15:28 UTC | reply to this comment | These kids are too white to be his. Black people don't make babies that look like these kids, no matter how white the mama be. |
| Comment #51.1 by: jazzy on 17 Sep 2011, 09:24 GMT | i agree those kids are not his, michael was obsessed with white features just look at what he did to homself. |
| Comment #52 by: tvhost on 11 Jun 2012, 02:47 UTC | reply to this comment | Michael Jackson is not the biological father of the three kids and never legally adopted them, either. Also, he didn't have a skin disease other than bleaching his skin trying to be white. Paris looks a lot like Debbie Rowe (the eyes) but I'm not sure who the biological parents are. The only person who ever legally adopted these kids is Katherine Jackson, known to the Jackson children as Grandma. Oh, well... |
| Comment #53 by: Rea talk on 26 Jun 2012, 23:06 UTC | reply to this comment | the kids are WHITE MIchael was Black his DNA does not Change |
| Comment #54 by: JC on 20 Jul 2012, 03:17 UTC | reply to this comment | For those of you who think a mixed child cannot look white and have blue eyes you are all completely ignorant of the many oddities of biology. My daughter is mixed and could pass for white any day (blue eyes, dark blonde hair) and I have no doubts about who her father is. What does it even matter if they are his biologically? He put the work and effort into raising them, that's what a REAL daddy is! There are far too many biological fathers out there who couldn't care less about their children. |
| Comment #55 by: Rich on 23 Jul 2012, 13:51 UTC | reply to this comment | very interesting Dr., sounds plausible! |
| Comment #56 by: jojo on 30 Aug 2012, 19:01 UTC | reply to this comment | I think that even if the kids are not biologically his, it's okay. He loved them like his own. Also, he had health issues and probably didn't want to pass them off to his kids. If I were Debbie, I would have done the same thing. Maybe I wouldn't have asked for so much, but I would have granted Michael's wish to be a father. | |
Copyright © 2001-2013 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at 
|
|