Search Perform an advanced search query SOFTPEDIA
 
SOFTPEDIA
Updated one minute ago
HomeSubmit a program for being reviewedAdvertise on our websiteGet help on surfing our websitesSend us your feedbackGet information about our XML/RSS backend and how to use itBrowse the news archiveVisit our discussion forumVizitati forumul in limba romana



KLIP
  1. HOME
  2. SCIENCE
  3. TECHNOLOGY
  4. WEBMASTER
  5. SECURITY
  6. MICROSOFT
  7. LINUX
  8. APPLE
  9. GAMES
  10. TELECOMS
  11. REVIEWS
  12. LIFE & STYLE
  13. EDITORIALS
  14. INTERVIEWS
  15. RSS
Welcome!
Hello, Guest

Login if you have a Softpedia.com account.

Otherwise, register for one.

HEALTH

Radiation and the Best Way to Save Boobs

- Standard radiation therapy in case of breast cancer may be too strong

By: Stefan Anitei, Science Editor

It's a fatality stalking women. Breast cancer is the cruelest killer cancer in women and radiation therapy is one of the main weapons used against it. It is a delicate procedure: radiation must be strong enough to kill the cancer, but in the right small doses so that normal healthy tissue will not be harmed. Two new researches signaled by New Scientist show that the current medical practice uses
too much radiation against breast cancer.

The current standard in the treatment of early breast cancer employs 50 Grays of radiation in 25 separate "fractions" of 2 Gray doses, over five weeks.

The first research, led by John Yarnold at the Institute of Cancer Research in Sutton was made on a poll of 2236 British women with early breast cancer.

After the tumors were removed, the women were randomly divided in 3 categories: the first group received 39 Gray in 13 fractions; the second,41.6 Gray in 13 fractions; the last category followed the standard procedure. Treatment was 5 weeks long in all cases.

5 years later, tumor relapse was similar in the 41.6 Gray group (with doses of 3.2 Gray), as in the group following standard treatment.

In the other approach, the same team assigned 2215 women into two groups: one following the standard treatment and the other going through a 3 weeks treatment of 40 Gray in 15 fractions.

6 years later, the second group had manifested less adverse secondary effects and a decreased rate of tumor relapse (2.2% versus 3.3%).

Some are cautious about these results.

"The study needs a much longer follow up. Similar studies of head and neck tumors have found the opposite. Keeping doses low and increasing the number of fractions minimizes normal tissue damage," said Harry Bartelink, at the Netherlands Cancer Institute in Amsterdam.

But the authors have found some explanations for these results.

"Adenocarcinomas, such as breast and prostate cancers, may simply respond differently to radiation than squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck," said Yarnold.



MORE RELATED ARTICLES: Crocs Manipulate their Lungs When Diving or Attacking Inflammation and Healthy Breasts This Is the Time to Become a Male: 8-14 Weeks of Pregnancy Yak Cheese Is a Miracle Soybean, Male Sex and Cancer Kalash: The People of the Nine Skies Garos Sexual Behavior Inventory: Your Sex Issues Black Humor Is Learnt, Positive Humor Is Innate Namib Desert: The Tallest Dunes DNA Tracks Down Bursts of HIV Infection
 
Comments | Link here | Subscribe
Print | Send to friend
Today's News | Yesterday's News

Search:


19th March 2008, 18:06 GMT | Copyright (c) 2008 Softpedia | Contact:
Read by 766 user(s) | Rating: | 8 vote(s) so far | Cast your vote:
Radiation and the Best Way to Save Boobs - USER OPINIONS




We are sorry, there are no opinions available for this article.






SHARE YOUR OPINION ABOUT Radiation and the Best Way to Save Boobs

Since you are not logged on, your comments will have to be approved before being displayed.
Click here to login, or register.
Your Name:
Your Email:
Type in the result:
Your Opinion:
 


DO YOU WANT TO CONTACT US?  

If you have some comments or you want to send us some information you can send us an email directly to .
You can use the form below for the same purpose.
Your full name: (at least 3 characters)
Your email address: (at least 5 characters)
Message subject: (at least 5 characters)
Message text:
(at least 10 characters)
Type in the result:
 
 



© 2001 - 2008 Softpedia. All rights reserved.
Softpedia™ and Softpedia™ logo are registered trademarks of SoftNews NET SRL.
Copyright Information | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Contact Softpedia | Update your software | Archive