Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
TRENDING TODAY
Home > News > Science > History

August 19th, 2009, 10:46 GMT · By

Pterosaurs Preferred Landing on Prehistoric 'Runways'

SHARE:

Adjust text size:

Pterosaurs walking on all fours, eating lizards off the ground. They only flew when they had to
Enlarge picture
Paleontologists have recently managed to uncover a first-of-its-kind prehistoric "runway" for pterosaurs, the ancient, bird-like animals. The tracks, found at a location dubbed Pterosaur Beach, in southwestern France, are the first evidence to show how these animals landed, which is something that is apparently very rare to come by. The main reason for this is the fact that the animal were very light, and did not leave a massive imprint on the ground, such as the largest dinosaurs that ever roamed the Earth, the 50-tonne sauropods, did, LiveScience reports.

The French location proves, however, to have been a very suitable place for recording the landings of the light pterosaurs. Made entirely out of fine-grained limestone deposits, the structure provided the perfect scaffolding on which the feet of the creatures got molded and stored over millions of years. The tracks have been determined to date back to some 140 million years ago, to the Late Jurassic period.

The pterosaur was a pterodactyloid-class beast, with a wingspan no larger than two feet (roughly 60 centimeters). The pristinely preserved tracks managed to provide paleontologists with a remarkable site to study the landing behavior of these creatures, of which similarly well-preserved tracks can be found on only a handful of other locations in the world. The researchers determined that they came in for landing while flapping their wings to slow their descent, and then pushed both of their feet into the sand, at a very high angle.

Next, they took a short “stutter step” while dragging their toes briefly, most likely a hop with both of their feet, and then set their arms down, in the classical, four-legged posture that ancient flying creatures were recently proved to sport while on the ground. “No other trackways ascribed to pterosaurs in the world have shown either landings or takeoffs,” University of California in Berkeley (UCB) paleontologist and researcher Kevin Padian says.

“If tracks from pterosaurs are going to get preserved, it's likely to be in the softest muds or finest sands, and it's unlikely even then, so to get traces of a pterosaur landing like this is very exciting,” David Hone, who is a paleontologist at the Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology of China, in Beijing, adds. He has not been part of the new study.

The most amazing find that the deposit brought forth was the fact that the pterosaurs apparently had a more advanced wing and flapping control than first believed. Pulling a stall in mid-flight would have not been possible with only rudimentary wing control. Continuous research will most likely yield even more interesting conclusions, and the experts have plenty of tracks to analyze. “There are hundreds of trackways in this big quarry,” Padian concludes.


2,642 hits · 2 comments
Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


Explaining the Size of Dinosaurs

Dinosaurs Were Actually Smaller than First Believed

The First Tree-Climbers Positively Identified

T. Rex Proteins Survive for 68 Million Years

A View of the First Creatures to Walk on Land

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: Dave Hone on 20 Aug 2009, 05:44 UTC reply to this comment

There are some very serious and basic errors in this report:

1. The work was done by palaeontologists, not archaeologists or anthropologists. The former work on extinct organisms, the middle on human artefacts (like buildings and art) and the latter on human evolution.

2. Pterosaurs are NOT the ancestors of birds. Birds descended from dinosaurs (and no, pterosaurs are not dinosaurs either not lizards as you also claim, but a separate lineage).

3. pterosaurs did not *prefer* landing on soft mud, it is merely that this has the best change of preserving a landing trace - it would not and indeed could not preserve if they landed on rock for example.

4. The trace only shows them landing and not taking off as well as claimed.

5. the feet of the animals are not two feet in length, the wingspan of the animal that left this trace was about two feet across.

This catalogue of errors is frankly disturbing and serious with even the most basic facts confounded and turned around. This was written by the Science editor of this site and I can only wonder what is made of complex science stories.

Finally, if anyone is wondering, yes I am that 'Dr David Hone' quoted above.


Comment #2 by: b.b. on 08 Sep 2009, 18:19 UTC reply to this comment

Ah, would the Softpedia and the Science Editor care to address the errors in the article or print a correction...? Hello?

Copyright © 2001-2013 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM