Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Apple > Mac

December 16th, 2009, 09:20 GMT · By

Psystar Defeated

SHARE:

Adjust text size:


Psystar VS Apple logo
Enlarge picture
Psystar was brought to its knees by Judge Alsup on December 15, 2009 when he granted Apple a permanent injunction against the Mac cloner. As for the Rebel EFI (still selling on Psystar’s website at the time of this writing), the judge refused to exclude it from the injunction.

Outlining that Psystar was not very clear about what Rebel EFI did (although it is clear the tool is made to circumvent Apple security measures), the judge reportedly said that, “Psystar continues to sell it ‘at its peril’ at the risk of ‘finding itself in contempt if its new venture falls within the scope of the injunction,’” according to the Groklaw legal blog.

The blog serves those interested in the litigation well, court documents being said to stipulate that, “Only a clear explanation of the product, and discovery about it, can determine the matter, and Psystar is free to bring a motion and submit to discovery about Rebel EFI, if it wishes to reopen the question.” The injunction includes forbidding Psystar from “intentionally inducing, aiding, assisting, abetting, or encouraging any other person or entity to infringe plaintiff's copyrighted Mac OS X software,” determining Groklaw to resonate with judge Alsup’s thinking.

Court filings also say that Psystar can't “manufacture, import, offer to the public, provide or otherwise traffic in any technology, product, service, device, component, or part thereof that is primarily designed or produced for the purpose of circumventing a technological measure,” which pretty much spells death for Psystar’s business, the Groklaw legal blog points out.

The Florida-based would-be Mac cloner has until December 31st to comply, although the judge suggested it did so in one hour (or so Groklaw implies). Psystar is also faced with having to destroy everything tied to circumventing Apple's products, as well as report to Cupertino when it has finished doing so, with detailed information on the process.

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

2,125 hits · 1 comment · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


How to Update, Back Up and Restore Your iPhone/iPod touch

How to Rename Your Wireless Apple Mouse, Magic Mouse

Apple's 'Get a Mac' Ads Grab 'Campaign of the Decade' Title

Apple Posts New Lexmark, Epson Printer Drivers for Mac OS X 10.6

Steve Jobs Running for Time’s 'Person of the Year 2009'

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: EB on 17 Dec 2009, 11:31 UTC reply to this comment

Well, the best lawyer wins again. :)

But seriously, as a desktop Linux user for 5+ years, switching to OSX was the coolest thing I ever did. OSX is the best of both worlds for geeks that do some productivity-suite stuff occasionally.

Having said that, once Apple decided that OSX should only run on their hardware, I could have no qualms with that. It's business. Whether to sell their hardware, or OSX, I couldnt care less. What I know is that their hardware is cool, sturdy and long-lasting than most 'competitors'.

Hey, perhaps Pystar can emulate that. No need to re-invent the wheel (again). Fork a super-cool OS from, say, Debian or FreeBSD, talk with chaps like Adobe & Microsoft to port their suites onto there, offer it on strictly Pystar made hardware, and start competing with Steve Jobs!

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM