We all know PETA loves undressing women - the more famous, the better - and along the years, we've had to thank them for bringing quite a lot of smokin' hot semi-naked celebrities on their anti-fur poster ads. Pammy Anderson, Alicia Silverstone, Ditta von Teese, Holly Madison, Sadie Frost - there are just a few of the ladies who had no trouble at all flashing their most prized assents in order to convince us all to stop wearing fur. And while I personally have some doubts about PETA as an organization, I won't be getting into the "serious" part of the matter for now, simply because this is an entertainment section and you all come here to relax... and feast your eyes on a few well-chosen ladies who take off their clothes on principle. Kidding.

Well, half-kidding anyway. The trouble is, this time around, PETA has either screwed up and made a very bad decision, or simply got its priorities wrong and made a terrible confusion. Otherwise I can't explain why anyone in their right minds would use former porn queen and one of the world's classiest ladies of all times, Jenna Jameson, to dissuade people from buying or using leather. I may be getting things mixed up here a bit - but what kind of humanitarian message could someone like Jenna send? Not that any of us could possibly forget that, but Jenna was a porn actress - which means she used to have sex on camera, you know, for money - and her movies featured plenty of fur rugs, fur-lined underwear, leather belts, strap-ons and other leather-made devices that would probably put even a respectable fashion designer to shame. Or at least that's what I heard, never having seen any of her movies myself, you know. Except maybe once for purely research purposes. Yeah...

In any case, Jenna Jameson stripped to her underwear for this ad, and I admit I'm not particularly impressed with it. Thanks to good lighting, photoshop and more photoshop, we can't actually see her scarred boobs and she almost looks like a human being and not like the skeleton / duck mutant hybrid we all know she is. But still, why use a porn actress to dissuade people from using leather? If anything, they may become intrigued with her ad and decide they need a quick reminder of Jenna's... ahem, past exploits. And we all know where that will land us all. So, what do you think about Jenna's ad? Is the Betty Page pose convincing or just plain annoying?