NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
Home / News / Science / Behavior/Humans

Behavior/Humans


Polygraphs Are Not Reliable in Detecting Lies

There are many flaws

By Stefan Anitei, Science Editor

24th of May 2007, 11:41 GMT

Adjust text size:



Enlarge picture
People are always searching for the supreme truth.

But are the polygraphs a reliable tool in detecting lies?

It seems that those who know how to lie have little to fear, as they can control their emotions. Instead, the victims could be the truthful people.

Polygraphs were not developed as lie detectors; they just track down physiological expressions linked to lying in some people, like racing heart and sweaty fingers and everything's in the hand of the subjective interpretation of an examiner, fact that may lead to errors.

It's impossible to make the difference between the anxiety of "I'm going to be caught" and "they're going to believe that I'm lying when I'm not."

The polygraph is just a medical device that registers respiratory rate, heart rate, blood pressure and electrodermal response, and minute changes in perspiration,
normally from the fingertips.

The problem stands by no means in the accuracy of the apparatus. A 2002 research made by National Academy of Sciences 2002 reached the conclusion that "polygraph tests can discriminate lying from truth telling at rates well above chance, though well below perfection. The polygraph rests on weak scientific underpinnings despite nearly a century of study." "The high incidence of false positives-a truthful response determined erroneously to be a lie-makes the polygraph useless," the Academy said.

The modern polygraphs could detect 8 out of 10 spies employed at a national atomic laboratory with 10,000 hypothetical workers. In this case, the polygraph would detect 1,600 innocent guilty employees, translated to 1,600 ruined careers. But the government officials disliked the results, as they still employ the polygraph in the war on terrorism.

About 8,000 employees at the Los Alamos National Laboratory have been announced they will be checked randomly with the polygraph.

Scientists warn that the polygraphs of the future should involve brain scanning.

A study at Temple University in Philadelphia discovered brain areas involved in lying and which can be monitored with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scans.

But if for some people lies are "their truths", even this method could be flawed.

TAGS:

lie | polygraph | heart


Rating:
Fair (2.4/5) 5 vote(s) so far    

Read by 729 user(s) | Add comment | Link to this article
Subscribe to news | Print article | Send to friend

© Copyright 2001-2008 Softpedia
Contact:

 

 

SEARCH THE NEWS ARCHIVE :




Today's News
| Yesterday's News | News Archive


MORE RELATED ARTICLES:


$25,000 Reward for Tracking Down the Japanese Whaling Fleet in the Antarctic Waters

Why Do We Like to Eat What We Eat?

Why Can Dating Online Be Deceptive?

Hunting Fossils on Mars

Razing a Myth: Genetics, Not Stress, Behind the Gray Hair

Do Monkeys Talk?

Alimentation to the Extremes: Which Are the Effects?

248-Dimension Number Ready for String Theory

Want Sex? Then Lie and Cheat...

Where Does the Violence Lie?

User opinions:

No user comments yet.
Be the first to express your opinion using the form below!

Share your opinion:

Your Name:
Your Email Address:
(will not be used for commercial purposes)
Solve this to prove you're not a bot: =
Your review/opinion:

 






SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   ENTER NEWS SITE   |   ENGLISH BOARD   |   ROMANIAN FORUM