Softpedia
 

NEWS CATEGORIES:



NEWS ARCHIVE >>
SOFTPEDIA REVIEWS >>
MEET THE EDITORS >>
Home > News > Games

September 30th, 2010, 06:57 GMT · By

PlayStation 4 and Xbox 720 Might Not Succeed Because of OnLive, Pachter Says

SHARE:

Adjust text size:


OnLive might beat next gen consoles, Pachter says
Enlarge picture
The next generation of consoles, with devices like the PlayStation 4 or Xbox 720, might not be successful, if video game download and streaming service OnLive might get off the ground, at least according to famed video game analyst Michael Pachter.

We're already around the middle of the current generation console cycle, and already the PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360 are receiving new technologies to keep them interesting, through PlayStation Move and Kinect, but also redesigns, in the form of the new Slim versions.

But video game download and streaming service might foil Sony's and Microsoft's plans, according to Pachter.

The Wedbush Securities analyst says that if OnLive will adopt the new fads like 3D or motion controls, it might pose a serious threat to the likes of the PlayStation 4, Xbox 720 or Nintendo Wii HD.

When asked if such OnLive can compete with them in four or five years, Pachter replied: “I'm not sure where OnLive will be by then. If they can deliver a similar 3D/virtual reality experience (to Move and Kinect), we may not see new consoles succeed.”

Bear in mind though that this is a big if, and the first impressions of the OnLive beta stage aren't exactly praising the program.

OnLive currently offers members the ability to buy full games like Assassin's Creed 2 for 40 dollars or rent titles like Batman: Arkham Asylum for just 5 dollars.

The games are saved to that account, and can be accessed, with the game being played on OnLive machines and streamed back to the end user's machine.

As you can imagine, the whole experience depends on the user's Internet connection and speed, so it can't be accessed by a lot of people.

Will OnLive eventually pick up and become a threat to the regular game consoles? 

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK:

3,523 hits · 2 comments · Link to this article · Print article · Send to friend · Subscribe to news

MUST-READ RELATED ARTICLES:


OnLive Offers First Year Free to Founding Members

OnLive Will Launch on June 17, Sign Ups Are Live

OnLive Announces Free, Rental and Demo-Powered Game Portal

Shaun White Skateboarding Comes in Full 3D

OnLive Game Pricing Options Listed

READER COMMENTS:


Comment #1 by: OnLive user on 30 Sep 2010, 08:11 UTC reply to this comment

OnLive is not in beta. It has been live since June 2010, and by and large, the first impressions have been very positive (just Google it or check out their press page). Your link to "OnLive beta stage" points to a Sept 2009 (not 2010) article, which is when beta started.

I've been using OnLive since beta and have seen it evolve as they've worked out the kinks, and it works surprisingly well. A couple of weeks ago they got it working on Wi-Fi. Netflix stutters a bit on my Wi-Fi, but OnLive works smoothly. In fact, it's kind of hard to believe it works as well as it does, but if you've watched the steady evolution, you realize they've been slowly chipping away at the challenges to make it better.

Pachter's right. If it keeps improving as it has been and they introduce their TV adapter, there really will be no advantage to using a console over OnLive.

It's free. I suggest you give it a try and see for yourself. That's what I tell my friends when they don't believe me when I say it works. They are blown away.


Comment #2 by: Onlive blows on 27 Nov 2010, 00:11 UTC reply to this comment

The games * , I mean they seriously suck. I have been a founding member since the start. I am impressed with the ability to stream at the graphic quality it streams at. However, the games * . Why the * would I want to use Onlive when the games * . I think they only have like 20 games, maybe only 3-5 are good (assassin's creed 2, for example). The service is awesome the games suck. They have Saw, Alien VS Predator, ECT. Why not Dragon Age, Crysis, or Mass Effect? So you guys decide which is better, and what I mean by that is scraping some money together for a decent comp and tapping that steam service. Honestly, get a * job, buy a decent comp, and tap that Steam. I don't care if Onlive is in it's early phase of it's life span, the games on the service straight up * . I suggest you not give Onlive a try. That's what I tell my friends and they believe me when I say it blows.

Copyright © 2001-2012 Softpedia. Contact/Tip us at

WindowsGamesDriversMacLinuxScriptsMobileHandheldNews

SUBMIT PROGRAM   |   ADVERTISE   |   GET HELP   |   SEND US FEEDBACK   |   RSS FEEDS   |   UPDATE YOUR SOFTWARE   |   ROMANIAN FORUM