14 DAY TRIAL // A recent study conducted by Scottish scientists at the University of Glasgow found that organic milk should be more widely consumed than standard milk, as it is 68% richer in omega-3 fatty acids than conventional milk. Another study carried out independently by a team of experts from the University of Liverpool confirmed the findings.
The three-year-studies which highlighted the benefits deriving from drinking organic milk were conducted during the 2002-2005 period. Their findings are published in the Journal of Daily Science.
As a result of their study, researchers at the University of Glasgow addressed the Food Standards Agency a letter in which they claimed organic milk has considerably higher levels of omega-3s than standard milk and this fact should be known by consumers. Scottish scientists stated they wanted the FSA to "recognize that there are differences that exist between organic and non-organic milk".
Also, Nicholas Saphir from the Organic Milk Suppliers' Co-operative (OMSCo) stated: "Over the last few years there has been mounting research confirming the higher levels of omega-3 fatty acids in organic milk. This latest study clearly shows that the higher levels of these essential fatty acids are a result of the whole organic farming system. We believe that the consumer should have access to this information through the FSA." The Glasgow study was sponsored by the OMSCo.
Omega fatty acids intake provides our organism with a wide range of benefits, starting with the reducing of cholesterol levels in our blood. Omega 3 acids act also as anti-inflammatory acids that prevent or treat inflammatory disorders such as psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis, ulcer colitis and vessel walls inflammations that further lead to the tightening of the arteries. Omega 3 fatty acids are also very efficient for mental and cognitive performances, enhancing memory and concentration both in individuals and in fetus (when used by pregnant women in their alimentation.)
However, the FSA said that they think there are no such big differences between organic and non-organic food. "On the basis of current evidence, the agency's assessment is that organic food is not significantly different in terms of food safety and nutrition from food produced conventionally," a spokesman for the governmental watchdog stated. However, the spokesman added that the FSA must thoroughly investigate the study before taking any decision on the matter: "The agency has not yet seen the detail of this research, but we will certainly study it carefully in the usual way, seeking independent expert advice as necessary."